One complaint may permanently pants David's privates

It's some shithole in Russia, it's not like the local government of Florence is voting on dressing the real David.

Russia's fight against degeneracy goes too far.

>>63435
Can't the Russians do anything original? As the OP's pic implies, the Simpsons already did this.

This is what happens when you let pseudo religious prudes become the norm.

>>63435
> casual nudity distorts minds
> fearmongering and putting our sacks of meat on some sort of pedestal doesen't
We really should be slaves to whatever reptiles the conspiracy nerds claim to know about. We are clearly not able to think for ourselves as a species. Might as well put our lives to use in service of eomething greater than us.

>>63440
Simpsons did it

>>63436
>St Petersburg, Russia
>Some shithole
Not that this makes a copy statue any more important, but at least acknowledge the historic value of the city that basically formed Russia.

>>63494

this is 4chan where being poorly educated and dismissive all but the simplest common knowledge is frowned upon.

either get dumb or get out.

Barneyfag is really expanding his business.

>>63435
Top kek, if this trend continues, you'll probably get a generation of kids who exclusively know of sex and the human body from porn - soon foreplay will be known as making girls gag and retch from blowjobs and trying to dent the cervical wall.

>>63523
It's also worth noting that revered sculptures like David encourage positive body image for us males who have small or modest-sized members and do not tend to bulk from weightlifting.

Good to see Christcucks want to reclaim the SJW throne, they've been relatively quiet for a bit in comparison to tumblrinas.

>>63528
The ancient Greeks all bathed together in the nude, and didn't suffer from insecurity

Large dicks were considered vulgar and beastial.. uncivilized, David is a man of culture and refinement

>>63561
Im not sure we can really make a call on his member though, he is flacid.

>>63435
Simpsons did it

>>63494
Russia is a shit hole in general

>>63528
Didn't the Greeks make their statues with small penises so they'd be less prone to breaking off?

>>63435
I see people on /pol/ praise Russia for "fighting degeneracy" or some such shit regularly, but in reality they're just the most insecure population in Europe. The woman probably felt uncomfortable because his genitals were larger than her husband's.

>>63624

No. While penises that were small when flaccid may have been considered more aesthetic than those that hung out (growers>>showers), the main thing that made penises look extremely small in Greek statues was that all the heroic figures wore the kynodesme, or penis tie, which was standard for any athletic/naked activity. In some ways of wearing it the penis became essentially pushed upwards.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kynodesme

David doesn't wear it, but the essential penis aesthetic has been emulated in Renaissance sculpture.

>>63629
Thank you, history anon.

>>63528
>>63561
Ancient greeks were growers you idiots, their penis retract when not erect, a part of evolution because walking with a hung stick between your legs was not a good idea for natural selection.

>All this talk about greek penis evolution and shit

David's meant to be shriveled up in fear, it's David facing Goliath, and if viewed from above he looks terrified.

>>63748
>it's David facing Goliath
>in the form of typical greek sculptures
I'm pretty sure if actual christians were in charge, david would have been fully clothed. The naked aspect is a holdover from the greek inspirations, and because sculpting clothing was probably pretty fucking difficult.

>>63748
From what I can tell you're basing this on a single comment on Wikipedia's talk page that itself is an interpolation of a single academic's non-peer-reviewed commentary in The Guardian? Protip: it's utterly idiotic.

>>63785
It's not sculpting clothing that's hard

It's pulling up the trousers