http://www.theverge.com/2016/6/21/11983954/twitter-engage-influencer-app
>As an influential celebrity on the go, you've heard about Twitter, and your handlers are always telling you about what it can do for your brand. But what are you supposed to tweet about?
>And what happens if a normal tweets at you?
>Enter Engage, a new standalone app for influential Twitter users that takes some of the guesswork out of Twitter.
>The app, which is available today on iOS, is designed to help famous people interact with their fans and build a bigger following. The app includes three main tabs. Engage highlights the most important interactions you've had on Twitter, and includes mentions from users who are verified, followed by a lot of your followers, or interact with you a lot. An "understand" tab shows you high-level analytics for your posts, showing you how many impressions you're getting over time. And the "posts" tab shows you detailed performance numbers for individual posts.
>One thing Engage doesn't have: a timeline. Engage is for the celebrity who sees the value in tweeting, but would rather not pay attention to the broader conversation in the global town square. If reading Twitter makes you upset, but you still want to be able to broadcast the details of your latest juice cleanse, Engage may be the app for you.
>Engage seems to be modeled on Facebook Mentions, a two-year-old app that helps celebrities find posts that are talking about them. It differs from Engage in two significant ways. Mentions requires a verified Facebook account to use, whereas Engage will be available to all Twitter users. And while Facebook's version looks more or less like the flagship app with a special section added for monitoring mentions of your name, Engage is much more focused on analytics.
>>61158
related
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/twitter-engage-app-verified-download
>>61158
So when can we expect the musical number with Steven Seagal, Vin Diesel, and Lorde to promote this?
>sanctified class warfare
Yay everything's turning out like I expected
>>61158
>if a normal tweets at you?
>this is how they view other people that aren't celebrities
>>61158
How do I get a beta copy of this??
>>61158
>Engage
>v. To arrange for the use of
appropriate
>>61158
Cool, furthering the divide by helping people be lazy assholes.
>>61245
To be fair to the rich cunts, we do the same with normies. Reee.
>>61750
Are you a celebrity?
You know what I wouldn't even mind a dictator if he purged all the "famous" people the media pretends people care about
>influencers
That sounds like some 1984-type designation.
>Engage is for the celebrity who sees the value in tweeting, but would rather not pay attention to the broader conversation in the global town square.
>If reading Twitter makes you upset, but you still want to be able to broadcast the details of your latest juice cleanse, Engage may be the app for you.
They've literally excised the only good thing about Twitter and created an app full of nothing but condensed vapid horseshit.
>>61158
>>And what happens if a normal tweets at you?
Wow
>>61180
Underrated post
>>61158
Couldn't you just do the same thing by not following anyone and not reading anything people tweet at you?
If all you want to do is not listen, that's as easy as not listening.
gross
>>62021
Read malcolm gladwell's outliers. More or less, it's certain people that influence a whole lot of people. They may not be important themselves, but if they say something others copy it. Trendsetters, basically.
>>61982
Someone would just make more of the cunts
>>61874
No, he wants a version for betas like him.
>>64112
It's a different interface for twitter than what the norrmies have