THE “FINDING NEMO” CORALS ARE DYING

>>47056
damn

I read about this 10 years ago. They predicted it would happen, nobody cared.

...They call the Great fucking Barrier Reef, one of the greatest natural wonders of the world, the fucking 'Finding Nemo' corals?

>>47056
But why is your picture anemone and not coral?

>>47056
Yea, I heard this on NPR a while ago. If a living organism cannot adapt, it dies. Evolution is at work still.

People don't seem to understand that the corals are dying because the algae/bacteria that they form a symbiotic relationship with aren't adapting to changing environments, such as a rise in ocean temperature. It's not even the coral's fault, it's the microbes they depend on.

>>49365
>They predicted it would happen, nobody cared
sums up most environmental problems.

>>49465
It's not just ocean temp that's changing. CO2 reacts with the ocean salt to form an acid and lowers the pH of the oceans. It's called ocean acidification and is another consequence of burning fossil fuels.

>>49465
Newsflash for you fags:
No one cares. EVOLUTION, FUCK YEA

>>47056
That's what they get for promoting homosexuality

>>49467
>>49465
oh, humanity

>>49448
anemone are actually corals?

>>49467
>WE DIDN'T LISTEN!

Word Origin and History for nemo
n.

Latin, literally "no man, no one, nobody."


a Movie about parents searching for their lost child.. WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY EXIST

>>49574
This is false

Great Barrier Reef: scientists ‘exaggerated’ coral bleaching
By Graham Lloyd -The Australian

Activist scientists and lobby groups have distorted surveys, maps and data to misrepresent the extent and impact of coral bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef, according to the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt.

A full survey of the reef released yesterday by the authority and the Australian Institute of Marine Science said 75 per cent of the reef would escape unscathed.

guys, any news story linked to global warming or "CO2 is bad" is fake 99% of the time
just open your eyes instead or your wallets

>>51334
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/03/expert-scientists-exaggerated-coral-bleaching-story/

>>51337
also, if you openly question the new religion you will be labelled as heretic and fired:

>James Cook University censured Ridd and threatened to fire him for questioning global warming orthodoxy.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/13/university-censures-science-prof-for-fact-checking-global-warming-claim/

>>47056

>Virtually every year for the past half-century news reports have bannered dire proclamations by “reef experts” on imminent “threats” to the Great Barrier Reef.

>Although none of these “threats” have ever proven to be anything other than hypothetical possibilities or temporary fluctuations of nature, the doomsters never cease to rummage through their litany of concerns to find something they can present as urgent in order to keep the funding flowing.

https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2016/06/18/walter-starck-the-reefs-self-serving-saviours/

>>47056
>plugnstay
don't you think an event of this magnitude would be mentioned somewhere a bit more significant?