Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
China Scrambles Fighters As US Sails Warship Near Chinese-Claimed Reef 2016-05-11 15:21:40 Post No. 43946
[Report] Image search: [Google]
China Scrambles Fighters As US Sails Warship Near Chinese-Claimed Reef 2016-05-11 15:21:40 Post No. 43946
[Report] Image search: [Google]
![r[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ovfgTIE.jpg "r[1]")
China Scrambles Fighters As US Sails Warship Near Chinese-Claimed Reef
Anonymous
2016-05-11 15:21:40
Post No. 43946
[Report]
http://www.ibtimes.com/china-scrambles-fighters-us-sails-warship-near-chinese-claimed-reef-2367262
>China scrambled fighter jets on Tuesday as a U.S. navy ship sailed close to a disputed reef in the South China Sea, a patrol China denounced as an illegal threat to peace which only went to show its defense installations in the area were necessary.
>Guided missile destroyer the USS William P. Lawrence traveled within 12 nautical miles (22 km) of Chinese-occupied Fiery Cross Reef, U.S. Defense Department spokesman Bill Urban said.
>The so-called freedom of navigation operation was undertaken to "challenge excessive maritime claims" by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam which were seeking to restrict navigation rights in the South China Sea, Urban said.
>"These excessive maritime claims are inconsistent with international law as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention in that they purport to restrict the navigation rights that the United States and all states are entitled to exercise," Urban said in an emailed statement.
>China and the United States have traded accusations of militarizing the South China Sea as China undertakes large-scale land reclamation and construction on disputed features while the United States has increased its patrols and exercises.
>Facilities on Fiery Cross Reef include a 3,000-metre (10,000-foot) runway which the United States worries China will use to press its extensive territorial claims at the expense of weaker rivals.
...
>>
>China's Defence Ministry said two fighter jets were scrambled and three warships shadowed the U.S. ship, telling it to leave.
>The U.S. patrol "again proves that China's construction of defensive facilities on the relevant reefs in the Nansha Islands is completely reasonable and totally necessary", it said, usingChina's name for the Spratly Islands where much of its reclamation work is taking place.
>Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said the U.S. ship illegally entered Chinese waters.
>"This action by the U.S. side threatened China's sovereignty and security interests, endangered the staff and facilities on the reef, and damaged regional peace and stability," he told a daily news briefing.
>U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry waved aside a question as to whether the U.S. aim was to send a message ahead of a visit to Asia by President Barack Obama this month.
>"This is not a pointed strategy calculated to do anything except keep a regular process of freedom of navigation operations underway," he told reporters in London.
>>
Other coverage:
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-usa-china-idUSKCN0Y10DM
http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-warship-sailing-near-chinese-claimed-island-challenges-beijing-1462855738
https://www.rt.com/news/342545-south-china-sea-us/
>>
It was russia tier
>>
Like it matters.
Any missile cruiser can fire without line of sight...
China wants any reason to start shit.
>>
>>43960
Is it called "The South China Sea" because it's rightful Chinese territory? That's what they seem to think.
>>
>>43960
Like you said, any missile cruiser can fire without line of sight, therefore it had no reason to be there other than deliberate provocation.
>>
The UN tribunal ruling on the international legal status of the islands in the region is expected soon.
http://www.cfr.org/asia-and-pacific/chinas-maritime-disputes/p31345#!/p31345
After the ruling the US and others are promising to see that it's enforced.
I expect that the story will get huge.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1