Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Comey Drafted Statement Clearing Hillary Before Interviewing Key Witnesses 2017-09-01 02:38:08 Post No. 173956
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Comey Drafted Statement Clearing Hillary Before Interviewing Key Witnesses 2017-09-01 02:38:08 Post No. 173956
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1497986630037.jpg (2MB, 2500x3750px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2500x3750px
Comey Drafted Statement Clearing Hillary Before Interviewing Key Witnesses
Anonymous
2017-09-01 02:38:08
Post No. 173956
[Report]
As FBI director last year, James Comey began writing drafts of a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton, even before all witnesses in the investigation — including Clinton herself — had been interviewed.
The Senate Judiciary Committee obtained the Comey memos as part of its investigation into his firing by President Trump, which occurred on May 9.
The revelation that Comey had begun drafting memos of his exoneration statement comes from transcripts of interviews given last fall by two FBI officials.
James Rybicki, Comey’s chief of staff, and Trisha Anderson, the principal deputy general counsel of national security and cyberlaw at the FBI, gave the interviews as part of an investigation conducted by the Office of Special Counsel into the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation.
In a July 5, 2016, press conference, Comey said that he would not be recommending charges against Clinton for mishandling classified information despite her use of a private email server as secretary of state.
While the transcripts of those interviews are heavily redacted, they indicate that Comey started working on an announcement clearing Clinton in April or May of last year, before the FBI interviewed 17 witnesses in the case, including Clinton and some of her top aides.
Clinton was interviewed for several hours on July 2, just three days before Comey’s announcement.
In a letter to the FBI, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham also noted that Comey’s draft was prepared even before two Clinton aides, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, had reached what the two Republicans called a “highly unusual” immunity deal with the Justice Department.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/31/comey-drafted-statement-clearing-hillary-before-interviewing-key-witnesses/
>>
The limited immunity deal prohibited investigators and prosecutors from asking about conversations between the two Clinton aides and Platte River Networks, a Denver-based tech firm that maintained Clinton’s server after she left the State Department.
Grassley and Graham questioned whether Comey could have conducted a complete and impartial investigation if he had already made a conclusion about the outcome before all of the information in the case had been collected.
“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation,” Grassley and Graham wrote the FBI. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”
“The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts,” they added.
>>
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Bias is bias is bias.
>>
>>173958
>The Senate Judiciary Committee obtained the Comey memos as part of its investigation into his firing by President Trump, which occurred on May 9.
>While the transcripts of those interviews are heavily redacted, they indicate that Comey started working on an announcement clearing Clinton in April or May of last year, before the FBI interviewed 17 witnesses in the case, including Clinton and some of her top aides.
The source is the Senate Judiciary Committee nice try though.
>>
>>173958
attack the source. Typical liberal faggot.
This is being reported everywhere.
>>
>>173956
So? Drafting a conclusion is not the same as releasing it. Prosecutors do that all the time.
>>
>>173970
Why would you draft a conclusion before interviewing key witnesses?
>>
>>173974
Same reason you make Superbowl championship merchandise for both teams.
>>
>>173977
It does not say Comey was working on indicting her though that is the difference, unless you can show me evidence?
>>
>>173979
>original claim
>counterpoint, original claim is false equivalence
>nuh uh
>what's burden of proof
nobody in their right mind should take you seriously
>>
>>173970
>Drafting a conclusion is not the same as releasing it. Prosecutors do that all the time.
They generally don't pick one side, and they also generally don't do it before even interviewing their star suspect. You're delusional.
>>173977
>Same reason you make Superbowl championship merchandise for both teams.
Did he also draft a statement affirming their conclusion of her guilt? because I don't see that being presented in conjunction.
Again, you're delusional. Willfully so.
>>173996
nobody in their right mind should take you seriously
Careful throwing stones, hillshill
>>
>>174024
>because I don't see that being presented in conjunction.
The Daily Caller wouldn't mention it unless pressed to, don't forget that they are to right-wing news what OccupyDemocrats is to the left.
>>
>>174148
Well then refute it.
>>
>>173958
>I AM A COMMUNIST HEHEHEHE
that's what you said right, cause that's what I heard, mhm.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1