[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Driverless Cars Easily Confused

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 1

>http://nypost.com/2017/08/08/surprise-driverless-cars-are-easily-confused/

A few simple stickers on road signs could confuse driverless cars and cause accidents, research has found.

A team of scientists from the University of Washington, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Stony Brook University, and University of California Berkeley tampered with several signs and revealed the autonomous tech was fooled every time in some experiments.

Stop signs were mistaken for 45 mph speed limits and turn right signs were interpreted as stop instructions.

Love/Hate graffiti was added to stop signs and caused the driverless cars to misread the instructions 73 percent of the time.

And randomly placed stickers confused the car in every test with the technology believing the stop signs were informing it of a 45 mph speed limit.

In a real-world scenario this could’ve caused the car to plow on across junctions.
>>
I still say this is safer than non-Jersey drivers
>>
>>165970
A simple road sign sized sticker on a road sign can easily confuse a flesh and bone driver and cause an accident, but nobody complains, because who and why the fuck would put up fake road signs? (well, okay, this sounds like a fun idea)

This reminds me of some essay on cybersecurity I've read a long time ago, where the author argues that the problem with cybersecurity is largely our attitude - technically you can walk into a cafe and pour piss in a salt shaker or swap salt with any kind of white powder, but it is not considered a legitimate threat. Meanwhile doing the same on the net is a thing.
>>
>>165983
>imfuckingplying jersey drivers are safe
If there is one thing people from that region can agree on, it's that jersey drivers are drooling retards.
>>
>>166036
Good rebuttal, except there's actually graffiti on a large percentage of road signs in the real world.
>>
>>166070
Is there anywhere in the world where people think the people around them drive well?
>>
The AI Bot must have created his own language....
>>
>>166082
Not even NJ government thinks NJ residents are good drivers. Drove through once to reach Maryland and not even a mile in, I saw a billboard advertising a snitch line for lousy driving.
>>
I was wondering how they caught the culprit! lol
>>
>>166070
The only reason driving is dangerous in Jersey is because we get a lot of tourists that don't know how to adapt.
>>
>>166082
There are areas of the US where people are alright drivers. Having been around alot the deep south and urban areas are full of retards. Upstate NY is totally fine
>>
Please don't put one of these cars in China Town!
>>
>>165970
just another step in getting the point where machines can tell what is what better than humans can
>>
This is easily fixable by putting standardised chips or something readable by machines in every road sign.
>>
>>166262
>easily
>>
>>166266
hey at a buck not including labor, thats only 89 billion dollars.

anyways, a major issue with this is responsibility. its already illegal to deface property, but how the hell do you monitor 89 billion stop signs to make sure none of them are defaced in such a way that causes fatalities? since its nearly impossible to track every sign and find out who put a stick on it, who gets the murder charge when a car plows through a 6 lane because it misread stop as 65 mph?
>>
>>166430
You're asking the wrong question. This doesn't ask "who gets blamed when driverless cars mess up", this states definitively that driverless cars are not ready for any sort of widespread distribution.
>>
>>166036
>A simple road sign sized sticker on a road sign can easily confuse a flesh and bone driver and cause an accident

So something that virtually never happens? Meanwhile, road signs do get vandalized, defaced, and dirty. The stop sign in the OP pic apparently fools self-driving cars into thinking it's something other than a stop sign. No human being with a valid driver's license would make that mistake.
>>
>>166441
Valid driver's license? Shit, no human being over the age of 5 would be fooled by that shit. Even kids can recognize a stop sign.
>>
>covers stop sign in reflective tape
pranked out of your mind
>>
>>166262
Kind of defeats the point of all the research into image recognition, doesn't it? Honestly, self-driving cars are still a big meme at this point. It's going to be a lot longer than people think before they're viable outside very controlled conditions.
>>
This article is pointless. Not worth the comments. They are simply perfecting the technology (AI) and the algorithms through trial and error. Now that Quantum Computing is in play, it won't be long.
>>
Pretty easily solved by GPS telling the car what the speed limit is and where the turns are
>>
>>166550
Self-driving cars use a combination of video, lidar, radar, GPS, regular map, cooperative map, and complex "thinking".
If they see a 65mph sign, they don't just go 65mph through an intersection. They see the intersection several times (ie on several sensors), are confused by the absence of intersection-related sign, and will most likely slow down and beep to have the human driver take the wheel.
Human-less self driving cars will probably need a complete map, including every sign. Tesla cars are already writing it along with driving informations (this data is sent to tesla headquarters when human-driving)
>>
>>166036
When was the last time you confused a stop sign for a 45mph sign?
Thread posts: 25
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.