New leak says up to 6.6m migrants waiting to cross to Europe

thats the lege and arm oft an army, EU is mobalising the world greats army evers exist ...
beware world, take your share oft refugees AS long AS they are still available!!!!!

>>143228
Is anyone surprised by this?

Surprise surprise, if you literally ship them in by the hundreds every day more and more will come. Who could have thought that this would happen!

Kill them all.

>>143238
Only the racebaiters who think it's a choice.

>>143254

"Refugees return to homelands for Holiday"

>Refugees from Iran / North Africa have no war to flee dipstick
>Economic refugees are not refugees
>Didn't have a choice...yikes

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/710171/asylum-seekers-return-home-war-zone-holiday-migrants-refugees

http://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/arabic/en/article/2017/05/16/refugees-return-holidays

>>143258
You are retarded if you fall for racebait outrage pieces like that. The words 'refugee' and 'migrant' aren't interchangeable like you seem to think.

>>143254

It is absolutely a choice, made by the EU elites, and at every level of the European governments.

They could stop building centers to facilitate African migration, protect their borders, turn away boats that have no business being there, get rid of smugglers, NGO and these sorts of activities, deport all the unwanted migrants, stop the welfare state that is incentivizing them to come to Europe, warn the citizens about the problems that come with immigration, start caring more about European culture than clamping down on "fake news" and "hate speech". But they're not doing it.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/21/eu-official-well-force-members-to-accept-refugees/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
>EU Official: We’ll Force Members To Accept Refugees

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-18519395
>EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief

>https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4f0_1469463765
>Juncker: No Matter How Bad Migrant Crisis, Terrorism Gets, We’ll Never Give Up On Open Borders

https://gefira.org/en/2016/12/04/ngos-are-smuggling-immigrants-into-europe-on-an-industrial-scale/
>NGOs are smuggling immigrants into Europe on an industrial scale

>In France, 96% of rejected asylum seekers remain in the country.
http://www.thelocal.fr/20151020/france-deports-just-four-percent-of-asylum-seekers

>3 million Turks came to Germany as “guest workers”, but 80% of them now live on welfare.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/183720/80-turkish-muslim-settlers-germany-live-welfare-daniel-greenfield

Also addressing the problem of mass immigration, terrorism, "integration" isn't "racebaiting", it's fucking common sense. This is an invasion. Solution: dismantle the EU and stop all the policies that are enabling this.

>>143261
How is it race baiting, it's just stating something that happened

Do you promote the same caution to judgement when a cop shoots a black kid or a white football player date rapes a college student?

>>143228
Just wait until sea level rise starts displacing more people. If we can't even handle this level of migration without sperging out and going all neo-fascist, we are FUCKED when the migration crisis starts hitting more serious levels.

>>143276
>refugee crisis, normalized terrorism and now 6 million Africans coming in one year is acceptable
>so let's wait until even more of them come before "sperging out" and "going all neo-fascist" and "race-baiting"

Redditors are braindead. Now is the time to react, not when a billion more of them come in for whatever new reason they come up with like "rising sea level".

Europeans have trouble integrating the ones that are already there, it's gonna be impossible if they never shut their doors and too many of them keep coming in.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-crime-idUSKBN17Q1G4?il=0
>The number of migrant criminal suspects in Germany soared by more than 50 percent in 2016, data from the Interior Ministry showed on Monday - a statistic that could boost support for the anti-immigration party five months ahead of a federal election.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape
>85% of rapists in Sweden were non-Swedish immigrants.

>Sweden’s ugly immigration problem. More than half of welfare gets spent on immigrants. No-go areas and wide-spread unemployment among non-Swedes.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/swedens-ugly-immigration-problem/article26338254/

>In France, 70% of burglaries are committed by first or second generation immigrants.
http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/aucun-lien-entre-immigration-et-delinquance-france-peu-genereuse-avec-immigres-radiographie-quelques-cliches-bien-pensants-peau-1875772.html

>>143291
Don't bother. These people have already given up. They welcome the destruction of their society, culture and country that provides all these niceties like welfare, healthcare, freedoms and seperation of curch and state. They are actively working to destroy these things that they praise so much, it really is baffeling.

>>143228
6 gorillion
waitin patiently
tappin they foot
waitin for muh gibs
indulge anon, embrace
your, no, our greatest strenght

>>143301
I love how these articles never trucking mention the massive amount of refugees and migrants other poor nations have that far outstrip whatever Monmouth Europe gets (that is spread out)

Uganda has 1 million refugees for example currently.

RIP Europe. I liked it a lot.

>>143291
We're obviously on opposite ideological sides of this issue but way to COMPLETELY miss the point of my post. Sea level rise is projected to displace up to 700 million people by the end of the century. Think about that number for a second, and then try to imagine what the world is gonna look like trying to deal with that. It's ok to occasionally talk about things outside the scope of your narrow ideology you know.

>>143423
>Sea level rise
What are you doing

>>143424
Talking about how global human society is fucked because of it's inability to absorb massive migratory population shifts?

>>143428
>human society is fucked because third worlders want to come to America

?

>>143430
Are you being obtuse on purpose? Look at how extreme politics are becoming all over the world because of migratory populations at the levels we're currently dealing with. Imagine what everything is going to fucking look like when there are 700 million people trying to move away from the fucking water swallowing up the places they live. It's going to be a fucking nightmare.

>>143433
>It's going to be a fucking nightmare.
Lol

They'll move slightly inland. Then continue their lives as normal.

You have issues. Is this why leftists are so prepped for communism? You think the Earth is bad?

>>143270
So that would mean their seas would be flooded with dead bodies.
Their cities full of rovaing gangs of poor angry mobs.
Spending money trying to ship them back to countries that don't acknowledge them.

You're dreaming if you think any non shit hole country would simply sit back and watch mass murder/suicide/chaos take place in their back yard.

>>143423
Idk if moving from Afghanistan, Iran, and Africa to Italy, France, and the Netherlands is the best strategy lol

>>143423
>Sea level rise is projected to displace up to 700 million people by the end of the century.

They have been saying this for decades though. Lots of documentaries were made in the 20th century about how several cities would be underwater after 2000, Al Gore made all these claims, most of it hasn't panned out.

>1969, Lubos Moti, Czech physicist: “It is now pretty clearly agreed that CO2 content [in the atmosphere] will rise 25% by 2000. This could increase the average temperature near the earth’s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit. This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington, for that matter.”

>Michael Oppenheimer, 1990, The Environmental Defense Fund: “By 1995, the greenhouse effect will be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots…”(By 1996) The Platte River of Nebraska will be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers…The Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico.”

>June 30, 1989, AP: U.N. OFFICIAL PREDICTS DISASTER–entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos,” said Brown, director of the U.N. Environment Program. He added that governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect.

>>143490
I don't doubt you can cherrypick quotes relating to extreme predictions and not all predictions, whether conservative or extreme, will pan out exactly as predicted by specific individuals.

But that's not how sensible societies grant credence to warnings. We go by evidence and expert consensus. And the overwhelming preponderance of evidence across multiple domains of science suggests our planet will experience catastrophic warming over time.

And many predictions that have been made have come to fruition, including sea-level rise, permafrost melting, mass coral bleaching, and rapid increase in heat trapped by our oceans and even our atmosphere.

>>143410
Well if we could have sensible population control regimes, not to force abortion or euthanasia or birth control, but to promote families less prepared to raise and provide optimally for the next generation to have fewer children, we could not only solve issues of generational poverty and potentially unsustainable levels of resource use, but we could have a condition where refugee populations were encouraged to limit their family sizes unless they were socially and economically successful. But any such thought seems to upset conservatives too much.
I think individuals have freedoms but the well being of the children they bring into the world deserves consideration as well.

>>143523
Nueter refugees = profit

>>143518
>whether conservative or extreme, will pan out exactly as predicted by specific individuals.

Which is why you should be careful about believing them to the letter. You claim 700 million people will be displaced, lots of people were believing those earlier predictions even at high institutions like the UN, and talking about "evidence", and "expert consensus" just like you do. In the 70s, there was a lot of talk of the Earth cooling and the "coming ice age" (there's even a TIME issue about it). 15 years ago, they said the Himalayan glaciers would be gone by 2010.

Climate change is a thing (debatable to what degree) but it's often used in politics for nefarious purposes, and for fearmongering, and you should take every prediction with a grain of salt, especially if it involves justifying mass immigration ("Europeans shouldn't have kids to save the planet from global warming", which is how they justify this mass immigration, because of low birth rates of the native population, and then "climate change will create massive population displacement", again trying to justify mass immigration and make it seen inevitable and necessary).

The fact that you're even saying that accepting over 6 million African migrants in a year is fine because "a lot of more of them will come later anyway" shows that it works. They've already normalized the idea of hundreds of millions of people from the third-world moving to Europe in your mind, despite Europe only having ~750M inhabitants right now, and how destructive to European culture and society doubling that number with non-Europeans would be)

>>143529

We should treat every idea skeptically but there's a problem when we insist that no policy decisions should be made until we have for practical purposes convinced the general population to be certain that all the hazards predicted by decades of data and expert consensus will come to fruition. We can't proceed along a path as a civilization where we accept 10% possibility of such severe hazards that they pose an existential threat to billions of humans, when the solutions, like regulating industry and subsidizing certain technologies, are so feasible and even macroeconomically favorable in the long term.

I don't think everyone's opinion should be given the same weight just because everyone isn't on the same page on the topic.

And you seem to have it backward; policy makers and experts are warning that there could be mass movement of human populations across the globe as a consequence of inaction in controlling climate change via regulatory and subsidy regimes imposed by government on industry.

If it turns out that we have mass desertification in equatorial regions of the world and rise in sealevel sufficient to displace populations in the developing world and rob them of their livelihood, then populations living further up north are going to bear some responsibility for the hazards of climate change coming to fruition and thus some responsibility to those displaced persons. It's not fundamentally different than dumping industrial runoff into a stream and then being held responsible when folks living downstream are all falling sick with significantly higher frequency than their neighbors. So that adds to the risk for populations who are interested in avoiding accepting displaced foreigners.

>>143228
this is great, seeing europe taking in immigrants, note that, these immigrants are the "best" you can get, and will work for your EU economy, since EU is broke now. all the "low-level" immigrants wouldn't have the chance to get out anyway. so be grateful, the lots you get are the best they come in

>>143531

Never claimed you shouldn't do anything about it, although one of the problems with regulations is that it will cause more offshoring (which will cause more pollution in Asia, which is currently more responsible for pollution than the West), and the biggest offenders will probably be exempted from those regulations because of government corruption, not fixing the problem, and making smaller companies suffer and unable to compete.

>I don't think everyone's opinion should be given the same weight just because everyone isn't on the same page on the topic.
Typical of pretentious liberals.

>policy makers and experts are warning that there could be mass movement of human populations
Keyword here being: "policy makers", the same ones who are facilitating the mass immigration and building migration centers in Africa, as pointed out in the OP. Also I just looked up the prediction, and even it says "between 24 million and 700 million" (700 million ironically being the exact same number of people they're claiming suffer from water scarcity), so with a margin of error like that, even if you believe their predictions (which have been wrong in the past), it's silly to assume it's gonna be 700 million instead of choosing some of the predictions on the lower end.

>going to bear some responsibility for the hazards of climate change coming to fruition and thus some responsibility to those displaced persons.
Hard to quantify which country actually contributed more, America and parts of Asia would be a lot more guilty, which is something that is often ignored. Indonesia, China and India are extreme carbon polluters, so any serious initiative w/r/t climate change would involve putting pressure on them to lower their emissions. But it's not like it matters whether they have "responsibility", you support this wave of African migration even though Europe bears no responsibility for it.

>>143228

EU approves visa-free travel for Ukrainians

Ukraine passport holders will be able to travel visa-free to most EU countries under new rules approved by the bloc.

in next 5 years estimated 20 million Ukrainians will flock for EU as tourists for illigal jobs and black market. given to massive problem with gun control and crime in Ukrainian shithole i welcome all ukrainians in EU.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/05/eu-approves-visa-free-travel-ukrainians-170511140552955.html