4chans,
1) the Harvard study that solidifies the absolutely massive anti trump sentiment in the media
https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald-trumps-first-100-days/?utm_source=POLITICO.EU&utm_campaign=ab6d830a9d
2) the Dershowitz interview in which Dersh lays out there is ZERO illegal activity in trumps actions
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/05/19/alan-dershowitz-questions-russia-special-counsel-says-theres-no-crime
3) as such, the Trump white house is no longer communicating with the MSM, and is instead going directly to people via YouTube
your friend in disntermediation and disruption,
monad613
Bump for Trump
>>141827
>the Dershowitz interview in which Dersh lays out there is ZERO illegal activity in trumps actions
He might be right, but colluding with an adversarial government to help out in an election, even if it's done without any explicit mention of a "favor", is pretty shitty and then asking whether journalists can be imprisoned for publishing leaks and firing one of the guys investigating you, because you're upset about the investigation, comes off as very openly anti-democratic (small 'd') behavior, and is just as bad. Which is why I'm concerned the special counsel might only distract people from real political wrongdoings in search of criminal wrongdoing.
>the Harvard study that solidifies the absolutely massive anti trump sentiment in the media
Way to shoot the messengers.
Is it concievable that coverage could be for good reason?
Like maybe he stuff Trump says and does just looks awful? Or maybe journalists don't like Trump, much like the general population?
At least Trump doesn't have the authority to literally shoot the messenger.
>>141827
>3) as such, the Trump white house is no longer communicating with the MSM, and is instead going directly to people via YouTube
If you don't provide a link how will we communicate with our Fuhrer.
>>141842
>At least Trump doesn't have the authority to literally shoot the messenger.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/30/us/politics/can-trump-change-libel-laws.html
>>141842
>Which is why I'm concerned the special counsel might only distract people from real political wrongdoings in search of criminal wrongdoing.
Trump supporters only care about criminal wrongdoing because it means Trump could be removed from office and don't care at all about political wrongdoing. Their position is that fascism and authoritarianism sounds pretty good when it's their platform in office.
>>141827
>rump white house is no longer communicating with the MSM
Please be real
>>141827
Seems like both links are opinion pieces prohibited in the sticky.
>>141827
Great news! That means even more rope for the media to hang him with.
And do you actually think YouTube is a serious political tool on par with TV? Wake me up when Psy gets voted as President of South Korea.