Radio station owner under fire for PSA about tips for handling

>Then a local TV station reported a story on the PSA and the Cochise County Sheriff called it “disturbing.”

>Now, Lotsof has pulled his warning from the airwaves altogether because some of his advertisers have received threats.

>But he’s not backing away from why he recorded the PSA in the first place: Arizona’s penalties for possession of child pornography, he believes, are far too harsh.

>“Nobody put me up to it, and nobody paid,” Lotsof told the Associated Press. “My feeling is that these people don’t deserve life in prison just because they have pictures of naked juveniles.”

>Indeed, Arizona’s sentencing guidelines for possessing, creating or distributing child pornography are among the most severe in the nation. Sexual exploitation of a minor is a class 2 felony in Arizona and carries a minimum sentence of 10 years per violation, according to the state’s criminal code.

>“There’s no picture in the world that’s that dangerous,” Lotsof told NBC affiliate News 4 Tucson earlier this week.

>He claimed there was “no connection” between the people who actually create and distribute child pornography and those who only possess it.

>“The difference is one case, you’re molesting children and abusing them, causing children to do things that are not natural for children to do,” Lotsof told New 4 Tucson, “and the other case, they’re just possessing pictures.”

>In an email to the Arizona Republic, Lotsof said his PSA “does not condone child pornography in any way,” but “merely points out that the penalties for possession of child pornography are draconian.”

>“The real victims,” Lotsof added, “are the people serving these incredibly long sentences.”

>Carol Capas, a spokeswoman with the Sheriff’s Office, told the Republic it is “sickening” to hear people say “a picture isn’t a crime.”

>“It is a crime,” Capas said. “Those children are victims of a crime.”
...

>According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, data suggests that at least 100,000 American children are sexually exploited each year. A study of those perpetrators arrested for possessing child pornography found that 40 percent had also been accused of raping children.

>“Child victims suffer at the hands of the offender who sexually exploited them,” the center’s website says. “This harm is compounded when the offender memorializes the victimization by taking photos or videos and then distributing these images on the Internet where additional offenders use them for purposes of sexual gratification.”

>The Cochise County Sheriff’s Office is investigating whether the PSA violates state law, Capas told the Republic. In a statement, Sheriff Mark Dannels said that his office “will continue to seek legal advice on actions that can be taken for the content that has already been released and to ensure this kind of information is not released again.”

>“This is very disturbing to know that a member of our local media, who should be one of the responsible groups of people to provide factual information to our public to keep them safe, is promoting and encouraging criminal behavior,” Dannels said, describing the PSA as “disgusting and unacceptable” propaganda that “encourages evil behavior.”

>“Freedom of speech does not include telling people to commit crimes,” he said, “and continuing to pass on this information could lead to judicial action being taken.”
...

>But Cochise County Attorney Brian McIntyre told the Associated Press that Lotsof’s PSA was protected speech under the First Amendment.

>“This individual just happens to have a platform that maybe others don’t and is advocating beliefs that are personally repugnant to me,” McIntyre said.

>The Federal Communications Commission does not enforce requirements or restrictions on the content of PSAs, spokeswoman Janice Wise told the Associated Press.

>“It’s up to the station to determine their [community’s] public interest,” she said.

>In his statement defending the PSA, Lotsof said he was simply providing his audience with facts.

>“That information is perfectly accurate and important,” he said.

>>138805
What an idiot

>>138809
well you stupid piece of shit

please bump this shit to the front.

>>138808
Fucking idiot

>>138806
>The real victims are the people serving incredibly long sentences
>Not the kids who are being exploited in the first place

Coming from someone who's been molested as a child, he has a point. It's odd he didn't even say it's best to not have it in the first place, though.

>>138805
lol. as if change-org makes any real difference.

>>138808
>>138807
>>138806
>>138805
Read the first post fully expecting at some point for him to clarify that it was necessary steps for delivering the evidence to the proper authorities without accidently incriminating yourself in the proccess. The rest is nonsense for the same reason drug possesion and purchasing stolen property are punished