Posting it here because, independent of your opinion on lolicon,

>tabloid BS about Facebook
No it won't.

File: 1471660451801.png (880KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1280x720px

>>131793
>>>/pol/
Check these and then fuck off.

>>131793
>this will have a huge impact on the anime community as a whole.
I still gonna fap to loli you aint gonna do nothin'

>>131793
>kikebook
No thanks.

>>131793
>anime community
kek

>>131796
MY MAN
they cant take away our loli it would go against the freedom of artistic expression and a violation to our human rights.
LOLI IS ETERNAL

>>155853791
>“Welcome,” one forum poster said, “to the darkest corner of the web.”
Post Erio until OP fucks off.

>>131793
1. If you have a facebook account you are a subhuman by definition.
2. If you post anything that is regarded morally questionable by your peers, like loli manga, on facebook you're not just a subhuman but a particularly retarded one too.
3. If you do so while living in the UK, Australia or New Zealand you must be the dumbest motherfucker on the planet and deserve all shit you get.

This means very little to the "anime community".

The Anglosphere is a freedom hating police state, what else is new?

File: How to kill a viral article.jpg (39KB, 737x440px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 737x440px

No it won't

File: 962195.gif (641KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 540x304px

>>131793
>Times
They are a bunch of cucks, virtual signaling like desperates because they have no place in the modern era.

File: 1478152706719.gif (307KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 500x281px

>>131801
Shit, I'm retarded.

>>155853791
problem with fb is that once you do private groups no one has access to it besides members and tons of pedo's abuse of it. fb is literally safer then the dark net in exchanging pedo content

>sol with college girls
Great.

File: 1464127879352.jpg (121KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x600px

>>131805

File: spiderman 01 - 00.jpg (179KB, 685x1069px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 685x1069px

this is spiderman thread now

File: 1472119266127.jpg (2MB, 3500x1968px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3500x1968px

>>131808

>>131806
this is probably bullshit

>>131806
No, isn't. They have some algorithms that automatically ban the groups and the users for post things that the system see as Sexual. Of any kind
Even normal porn.

>>131806
Why yes Officer, I believe you're telling the truth.

File: 1462623071476.gif (926KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

926KB, 500x281px

>>131810

>Paywall

Fuck that. Though I do hope this fucks over the lolifags on /a/.

File: 1464028039409.png (230KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 500x281px

>>131814

>>131793
WHOA so what you're saying is people use things to commit crimes????
fuck i better sell my car and my home and my stamps. people mail letters to each other to plot crimes and once a guy got caught transporting drugs and some people were kept hostage in the basement of a house. anime is also doomed.

>>131811
>>131812
>>131813
do your research
there is tons of videos on youtube talking about this issue

>>131793
I don't see what anime has to do with real children being exploited, in fact I'm sick of the two being mentioned together when they have no fucking relation

File: 1490841224597.jpg (62KB, 848x480px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 848x480px

>>131816

File: 1404105302261.jpg (168KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1280x720px

>>131793
>This shit again.

>an international website should abide by my country's laws

All women must now wear a hijab in photos.

Wouldn't want to offend the prophet.

File: 7fca8b734734191b6c047b8ed9c39fc6.jpg (79KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 600x600px

>>131815
Considering how they consider JS, JC and JK all pedophilia, I'm sure you do.

File: spiderman 01 - 15.jpg (162KB, 714x1050px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 714x1050px

>>131809

File: 1481236723857.jpg (928KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 1500x844px

>>131820

>>131793
Oh no, soon we'll be living in a dystopian world where everyone hates us and porn is illegal.

Oh wait, that already happened fucking decades ago.

File: 1475013397101.jpg (1MB, 1260x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1260x1500px

>>131825

>>131802
>1. If you have a facebook account you are a subhuman by definition.
Everyone has a facebook account

They won't do shit, Japan doesn't care

>>131818

There's tons of videos on youtube talking 9/11 being an inside job too. What the fuck is your point?

File: spiderman 01 - 16.jpg (185KB, 696x1031px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 696x1031px

>>131824
> he hasnt read the 700 issues of the amazing spiderman
end your existence

File: 1451847001032.jpg (278KB, 680x720px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 680x720px

>jewbook
who cares
>potentially illegal
it's either legal or illegal

File: 1473081083219.png (172KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 500x281px

>>131827

>>131828
t. subhuman

>>131828
>Everyone has a facebook account
No they don't

>>131831
This panelling is really bad.

File: 1491772377964.jpg (30KB, 680x382px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 680x382px

>facebook

File: 1476429836349.jpg (211KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1280x720px

>>131833

File: [Central-Anime] Chouja Reideen - 03.avi_snapshot_06.03_[2016.12.09_17.38.31].png (349KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 640x480px

>>131793
>facebook
>tabloid shit
Not /a/ related.
>>>/a/rules/1
If you're going to dignify this thread with a response, remember to rage and/or seport.

>>131828
You must be one of those retards he's talking about.

>>131828
I don't.

File: spiderman 01 - 17.jpg (185KB, 708x1035px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 708x1035px

>>131831

>Japan olympics soon
>MSM has been slowly taking aim at anime with increasing frequency over the years
>/a/ puts its head in the sand
sasuga

File: 1482506350520.gif (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>131838

File: darkness.jpg (92KB, 766x428px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 766x428px

>>131801

>>131834
>>131835
>>131840
>>131841
I meant everyone who is actually a member of society.
Even if they don't use it, which goes for most, they still have it.

It will have zero impact.
You fags all better be reporting this garbage.

File: 1488793832177.jpg (372KB, 850x1198px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 850x1198px

>>131844

>>131846
>I meant everyone who is actually a member of society.
i.e. not us.

>>>/out/

File: spiderman 01 - 18.jpg (193KB, 705x1041px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 705x1041px

>>131842

File: [HorribleSubs] Alice to Zouroku - 02 [720p].mkv_snapshot_14.37_[2017.04.13_18.45.07].jpg (86KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1280x720px

Loli dubs

>>131846
>i mean the goalposts over here

>>131850
> t.permavirgin
speak for yourself sanchez but I have savoured the tuna

File: 1461375097018.jpg (283KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1280x720px

>>131853

>>131855
And you clearly have no place on /a/.

>>131843
>MSM
What?

>>131851
how do you read comics online without paying?

>>131828
I was forced to have it's account, because of work and family.

>>131846

I dunno man, out of the dozens of people I keep up with I know only two that even had a facebook account.

Maybe they're both pedos.

File: 1465419455584.png (1MB, 1600x899px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x899px

>>131856

File: 1397795511824.jpg (134KB, 745x717px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 745x717px

>>131856
I'll help since she's my waifu.

>>131837
>/co/

File: 1477267921011.jpg (232KB, 680x962px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 680x962px

>>131862

>>131857
> everyone on /a/ is your typical neet
dead meme

Check my 9.

File: spider-manga.1397464297023.jpg (330KB, 1176x1712px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1176x1712px

>>131809
The Spider-Man manga is surprisingly good.

File: 1491049002875.png (1MB, 1440x2099px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2099px

>>131865

I haven't visited /a/ for years. Holy shit is the crossposting on this site fucking abominable. How did it come to this?

>>131859
google

>>131858
Main Stream Meteor

>>131858
Main stream media. CNN, BBC, etc. etc.

>>131860
I refuse to get a facebook account. I don't even have a cellphone. When people want something they need to call me conventionally or send e-mails.

If you have worthwhile skills you can dictate your conditions. I can see that not everyone is in that lucky position though.

I had a Facebook account but I closed it a couple years ago when I realized it had no value to me.

>>131860
>work
Linkedln

>and family
Whatsapp.

File: 1491381227846.jpg (631KB, 1280x1874px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 1280x1874px

This doujin will get posted a lot in the incoming days.

File: 1467537940910.jpg (105KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1280x720px

>>131864
Samurai Jack is better than all anime though.

>>131870
>I haven't visited /a/ for years
why the fook ya lyin'

looks like facebook won another lawsuit

File: 1460672223314.gif (774KB, 329x210px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 329x210px

>>131869

>>131873
>>131872
Ahh. Then again, it's always been like this with every country before the Olympics.

Report and sage.

>>131874
Smartphones are pretty useful. They're a computer in your pocket.

>>131866
Given the opposition you've been getting it seems that /a/ is still a place for reasonable people.

I'm not a NEET and I don't have a facebook account either. And you should get rid of that account too.

File: 1490511243667.png (487KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 600x800px

>>131880

>>131793
>a huge impact on the anime community as a whole
Fucking great, if anime = pedo in the west then we'll have less normalfags on /a/.

>>131793
I laugh everytime, but y'know, this isn't really anime.

>>131793
Is that also a censored doll like yesterday's photo?

File: spiderman 01 - 24.jpg (177KB, 717x1035px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 717x1035px

>>131851

>>131843
What exactly are we supposed to do, you fucking idiot?
We don't even spend money in anime

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

> mod : yes pedo is anime related but since it isnt really talking about anime I move the thread instead of deleting it
useless mod

>>131843
The mainstream media are dying. All they care about is clickbait. If you ignore them you'll hasten the process.
There is absolutely no need to give a shit about them.
And if you live in Canada, UK, Ausfailia or New Zealand then this sort of content has been illegal for years.
After Brexit, there's little fear for Anglosphere paranoia to swap over to the continent, so I'm fine.

>>131892
>pedo is anime related
rofl everything is pedo related if you reach hard enough

>>131893
This. Like the social justice "movement", it's long hit it's peak and is on a slope down to hell.

Like I said, it's always been like this with other countries, yet little to nothing's changed afterwards.

Why was this thread moved to /news/ there is not even any links to a news story which is against the boards rules mods you screwed up.

>>131895
Well, the shit with pewdiepie and YouTube have gotten in some serious shit. Lots of YouTubers are having problems with money.
Mainstream media is dying, but they still have some power

>moved in /news/

moving it to /pol/ would be better

>>131898
True, but it'll still keep fading as time goes on. I understand that it has the power to make or break your reputation, but with all the yellow journalism and shit getting exposed from said MSM, it's all for the better.

>>131899
this.

Creeping on children via Facebook is so normal where this thread came from they dismiss it as sensational tabloid shit.

>>131794
I don't think The Times counts as a tabloid.

http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/13/facebook-refused-to-remove-child-porn-and-terrorist-propaganda-6572100/

>>131795
pics?!

>>131916
the thread was moved from another board.

>>131903
To be fair, it's sensationalist tabloid shit on /news/ as well. We are very critical of clickbait and activists on this board. I agree with >>131899

>>131928
>tabloid
Do you even know what that word means, is it different outside the UK or are you just unaware of who The Times are?

Or is it to be dismissed because you like a cheeky wank to a bit of loli but don't consider your self a paedophile?

>The social media company failed to take down dozens of images and videos that were “flagged” to its moderators, including one showing an Islamic State beheading, several violent paedophilic cartoons, a video of an apparent sexual assault on a child and propaganda posters glorifying recent terrorist attacks in London and Egypt. Instead of removing the content, moderators said that the posts did not breach the site’s “community standards”.

>a video of an apparent sexual assault on a child

But it's just harmless anime being hyped up to make a story right?
And I'm sure the beheading video was only shared by pretend jihadis.

>>131931
The Times is fine, but this entire "story" is based on hearsay and allegations and cherrypicked evidence from select facebook cases. It's mostly opinion as classified by the terms of the /news/ sticky.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-times-of-london/
>These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.

>>131933
>It's mostly opinion
Research and legal opinion. It's not an editorial.
Do you know what a QC is?

>Many of the images and videos uncovered were deemed ‘illegal’ under British law by Julian Knowles, QC.

>He told The Times: ‘If someone reports an illegal image to Facebook and a senior moderator signs off on keeping it up, Facebook is at risk of committing a criminal offence because the company might be regarded as assisting or encouraging its publication and distribution.’

>The newspaper said it discovered the offensive posts after creating a fake account and using it to befriend terrorists and paedophiles.

>And as a result of the site’s algorithms, Facebook suggested users should join groups that published the sick content.

That was from:

http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/13/facebook-refused-to-remove-child-porn-and-terrorist-propaganda-6572100/

Which you're welcome to attack as a poor source if you wish.
I wonder if legal action is taken against Facebook will you still call it clickbait?

>>131937
Your obvious outrage is the point of the story. That makes it clickbait. Clickbait = outrage and outrage = adsense revenue. How does it feel to have your moral outrage literally harvested for corporate profit?

>>131937
"Illegal under British law"
Facebook is an American website and the fact they specified British law means it was probably loli, because we've illegalised fucking drawings
So I honestly don't give a shit, like I wouldn't give a shit about some paki saying that all photos of women should be wearing burkas

Loli is cancer but to each his own and fuck facebook they're a bunch of pussies

>>131808
is she a foreskin

wait how the fuck are their images in /nuse/

>>132056
This thread was moved from another board by a mod with a sly sense of humor.

>>132037
>Facebook is an American website and the fact they specified British law means it was probably loli, because we've illegalised fucking drawings
Sexual drawings of children, yes they are illegal.

I shall start some websites that make money from the US while breaking their law.
You will lend your moral support I hope.

>a video of an apparent sexual assault on a child
This is not illegal in the US?

>The ease with which images can be circulated on the Internet or between mobile phones, or
can be enhanced, changed or created by means of computer software has increased concern
about the availability of images of child sexual abuse. We have stringent laws to cover the
making, distribution and possession of indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of
children under 18 but, as technology develops, a gap is emerging in respect of realistic
fantasy images of child sexual abuse. Concerns have been expressed by the police and
children’s welfare organisations about the increasing availability of non-photographic
images.

>Technology has advanced to the point that photographs of real children being abused can
be manipulated into cartoons or other depictions. Possession of these images is not caught
under existing legislation because they do not appear to be photographs, nor can the police
forfeit them and take them out of circulation. But nevertheless they are often graphic and
explicit depictions of the sexual abuse of children. There is concern that such material
reinforces inappropriate feelings towards children and that its circulation and possession
should be prohibited. We support that view.

This sums up pretty well why the law was made the way it was.

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100418065544/http:/www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-2007-depiction-sex-abuse2835.pdf?view=Binary

You can keep defending fapping to pictures of kids if you like, but I understand why /a/ didn't want you promoting your views on their board.

>>132226
>Technology has advanced to the point that photographs of real children being abused can be manipulated into cartoons or other depictions. Possession of these images is not caught under existing legislation because they do not appear to be photographs, nor can the police forfeit them and take them out of circulation. But nevertheless they are often graphic and explicit depictions of the sexual abuse of children. There is concern that such material reinforces inappropriate feelings towards children and that its circulation and possession should be prohibited. We support that view.
>Technology has advanced to the point that photographs of real children being abused can be manipulated into cartoons or other depictions.

Well, they "can". But that would defeat the point and be a waste of effort. If some sick bastard goes to all the effort and risk of creating child porn, they aren't going to then manipulate it into something anyone with a pen and paper can draw to avoid jail.

Just ban renaissance art if naked pictures of underage models offends you so much.

>>132236
>Just ban renaissance art if naked pictures of underage models offends you so much.
How much of this renaissance art depicts men with their dicks in 5 year olds?

>>132226
Okay mate, say I start drawing a stickman. As I draw it, I add more features until eventually you realise it's a naked child. At which point does putting my pen to paper become immoral?

>>132226
>I shall start some websites that make money from the US while breaking their law.
>You will lend your moral support I hope.
Americans actually have free speech rather than a legal system that outlaws sexual acts the government doesn't agree with along with drawings

>>131793
This Thread has been fucked from the very beginning. Op, I'm looking at you. Where's the copy paste that you promised. You broke news rules. You should copy paste that s*** right now as a sign of apology to all of us here in keks newsroom. Then, never make another f****** throwed like that again. Add contact your to your s***** picture or get the f*** out

>>132378
Conservative states ban porn all the time, Anon. State laws are just as valid as federal laws. You're silly.

>>132382
Add content*
Sorry

>>132382
This thread started on >>>/a/ and got moved here by a cheeky mod, calm down.

>>131793
>illegal
>drawings
I'll never understand.

>>131828
>Everyone
*everyone that probably shouldn't be allowed internet access

>>132425
http://abcnews.com.co/utah-makes-pornography-illegal/

>>131804
>virtual signaling
It's virtue signaling you goon

>>133712
isn't that unconstitutional and against human right?

>>132384
>State laws are just as valid as federal laws
Only when there's no conflict between them.

>>135691
It's actually fake news. "abcnews.com.CO" is one of the most notorious fake news sites. They try to copy abcnews.com

>>132377
It used to be at this exact point according the the head of the branch of UK government responsible for the law in question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcU7FaEEzNU&feature=youtu.be&t=1014

Aired in 2001 though, so it may have gotten stricter. The whole "documentary" is still pretty relevant.

>>131803
underrated

>>135733
That is fucking hilarious

>>132226
fucking lel you are laughable

>>135805
The whole series is worth watching. The ease with which they got such high profile people to believe their nonsense shows how ridiculous the discussions on these topics were and still are