http://www.newsheist.com/Articles/2017.4.4_roger_stone_kushner_msnbc/1.html
Do you believe this?
Roger Stone claimed Tuesday that Jared Kushner, senior adviser and son-in-law to President Trump, is leaking information to MSNBC in order to hurt White House chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Citing unnamed sources, the longtime Trump confidant told Infowars' Alex Jones that Kusher is sending text messages to "Morning Joe" co-host Joe Scarborough.
"The president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, perhaps the one presidential aide who cannot be fired, is now in regular text-message communications with Joe Scarborough," Stone said. "Many of the anti-Steve Bannon stories that you see, the themes that you see on 'Morning Joe' are being dictated by Kushner."
>>128623
>newsheist
Something seems fishy about this. is there any other sources reporting this?
>>128623
Roger Stone claims a lot of things, like he was poisoned with polonium. I'll believe this when I see someone besides him back it up.
>>128660
>like he was poisoned with polonium
He would be dead That stuff is really bad for you.
>Roger Stone: Kushner Is Leaking Intel to Scarborough
>The president’s friend and self-proclaimed “dirty trickster” alleged on InfoWars that “there is no question now sources are telling me” Kushner was texting negative information about other White House officials to the MSNBC host.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/04/roger-stone-kushner-is-leaking-intel-to-scarborough.html
>>128623
>Did you believe this?
> Roger Stone claimed-
Nope.
>>128665
He is 1/16th Indian
>>128679
/thread
>>128623
>jews
/pol/ was right again.
i hope so
he wants to destroy the government
the government needs lots of reforming but i don't want it to disappear
any sane person, whether they're conservative or corporatist or nationalist or liberal, should be concerned about him holding a top position in relation to national security
>>128757
Who, Kuschner?
>>128623
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-heist/
>RIGHT-CENTER BIAS
>Factual Reporting: MIXED
Not as far right as BreitBart, but just as trustworthy.
>>128801
Here's a couple of useful rules of thumb that will save you checking that every time.
Anything to reported to Alex Jones from and unnamed source is worth questioning.
James Delingpole is curse upon humanity should you find him you must slay him.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/27/delingpole-president-trump-must-not-wobble-climate-change-whatever-ivanka-says/
>>128623
Umm you don't leak to a famous TV host who was a former Congressman. You leak to print journalist or editor whose face, voice, location, and communications are generally unknown to the world and of no concern to any tabloid or incidental observer, and who will be blacklisted and their career ruined if they break any rules of records, vetting, and confidentiality (to the extent that they will go to jail to protect sources). Joe has a steady media or political career guaranteed regardless of the journalistic ethics he may violate -- look at any Fox host.
>>128804
tldr: either Kushner is dumber and more careless than even Trump (very unlikely) or Stone is a paranoid/sycophantic backstabber pitching an obviously false accusation about his next-most-powerful colleague