http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/27/fbi-undercover-agent-was-in-car-behind-terrorists-and-failed-to-stop-attack/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBoqO3AG0vo [Embed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Culwell_Center_attack
03/27/2017
FBI Undercover Agent Was In Car Behind Terrorists And Failed To Stop Attack
An FBI undercover agent encouraged a terrorist to “tear up Texas” before the 2015 Garland, Texas shooting, and was at the crime scene and failed to stop or engage the perpetrators.
This was revealed in an investigation by CBS’s “60 Minutes” that aired Sunday. The Garland shooting left two terrorists, Elliot Simpson and Nadir Soofi, dead. They attempted to attack an event featuring cartoons of the Muslim prophet Mohammed, but were stopped by local police.
The attorney for Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem, who was sentenced for helping the two terrorists carry out the attack, revealed information on “60 Minutes” from the government which showed the FBI’s close proximity to the attack.
“After the trial we found out that they had had an undercover agent who had been texting with Simpson, less than three weeks before the attack, [writing] to him ‘Tear up Texas,'” attorney Dan Maynard said.
Simpson responded, “bro, you don’t have to say that…” The terrorist added, “you know what happened in Paris… so that goes without saying. No need to be direct.”
The FBI argued that the “Tear up Texas” message was not incitement.
An affidavit filed in another case said that the agent also “traveled to Garland, Texas, and was present… at the event.”
Maynard was given documents that showed the FBI agent was in a car directly behind Simpson and Soofi when they started shooting, and that he had taken a cell-phone photo of the security guard and police officer who engaged in a firefight with the terrorists.
“The idea that he’s right there 30 seconds before the attack happens is just incredible to me,” Maynard said.
>source is 60 minutes
>posts a Daily Caller misinfo piece
Why don't you post the original source instead of the clickbait merchant version, OP?
Oh, I see why now. After searching this, all that comes up is right wing media like pjmedia and counterjihad report. The FBI allegations are an anonymous source and it's based on a 60 minutes episode that aired months ago. So it's literally O'Keefe-tier nothingness based on editing.
It sounds like certain someones are lashing out at CBSnews for their recent hitpiece on Hannity.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/27/ted-koppel-calmly-explains-sean-hannity-why-hes-bad-america/99680636/
>>126067
>It sounds like certain someones are lashing out at CBSnews for their recent hitpiece on Hannity.
Is that why I recently saw at least one other thread OP with the same sort of tone and sources bashing 60 minutes? Seems kinda petty to me, but amusing regardless.
>>126067
>
> Don’t like the evidence?
> Just disregard the source and declare victory!
>>126073
>O'Keefe-tier
>>126070
>Seems kinda petty to me, but amusing regardless.
History books will probably use this has a chapter title when talking about early twenty first century politics.
>>126063
>The FBI argued that the “Tear up Texas” message was not incitement.
laughing.Bilderberger.jpg