Rex Tillerson to Skip Key NATO Summit in April, Plans to Travel

>Tillerson's decision will likely raise eyebrows among some of the United States' European partners.

>Close to the Russian border, some people fear that Trump's thawing relationship with President Vladimir Putin could leave them exposed. Like NATO, Moscow has been ramping its military exercises and also annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014.

>"Donald Trump's administration is making a grave error that will shake the confidence of America's most important alliance and feed the concern that this administration simply too cozy with Vladimir Putin," said U.S. Rep. Eliot L. Engel, D- New York, who was one of the first to respond to Tillerson's decision.

>He added: "I cannot fathom why the administration would pursue this course except to signal a change in American foreign policy that draws our country away from western democracy's most important institutions and aligns the United States more closely with the autocratic regime in the Kremlin."

>He also labeled the move "an absolute disgrace."

>Historically, NATO's promise to come to the defense of any partner under attack has reassured these countries, particularly those in the former Soviet Union, who believed they would be safe from Kremlin interference.

>That's shifted under Trump, who has spoken warmly of Putin, called NATO "obsolete" and suggested he would not protect allies unless they upped their military spending. The FBI is also investigating links between his election campaign and Russian hacking. Tillerson has had dealings with Putin in his former role as ExxonMobil CEO.

>Trump has recently spoken in more reassuring terms toward NATO, but many analysts say that even the suggestion that the U.S. might not respond to an aggression might leave allies vulnerable. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, at a brief photo spray Tuesday with his Finnish counterpart, expressed confidence that the U.S. will be represented at the upcoming NATO meeting.

>"We'll take care of the representation," Mattis said. "This is something to be worked out, no problem."

>> 2 hours of excellent talks with Sec.Mattis. Serious business but a very warm welcome. Always glad to be with such a strong friend of NATO. pic.twitter.com/gnnGz99UHh
>>— Jens Stoltenberg (@jensstoltenberg) March 21, 2017

>It appeared that other U.S. officials were well aware of the negative signals likely generated by Tillerson's absence from the key meeting. Before the spokesman's official comment, one State Department told NBC News on condition of anonymity that there was a push within the agency to convince him to attend.

>However, Tillerson is instead sending the State Department's second-most senior official, Tom Shannon, to the key NATO meeting on April 5-6.

>A NATO official pointed out that "all allies are represented at NATO ministerial meetings ... it's up to allies to decide at what level they are represented," adding that such gatherings were "important regular events."

>Reuters, the news agency that first reported Tillerson's decision, quoted unidentified officials saying that the secretary of state would be staying in the U.S. to attending meetings between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the president's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

>Related: Chinese Media Claims Tillerson Visit Was a Home Run — for China

>The State Department spokesman did not mention this detail and NBC News could not immediately independently confirm it.

>The secretary of state is also scheduled to travel to a meeting of the G-7 countries in Italy before traveling to Russia next month.

>While she did not confirm Tillerson's meetings in Russia, Zakharova, the Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, said that "we are definitely surprised by the constant leaks of sensitive information from Washington."

There will be no need to be protected from Russia if Russia is already on your side, Russia is more valuable as an ally not an enemy

>>124321
I'm not really afraid of Russia.
I am afraid of setting a precedent where political parties form alliances on the basis of where their personal finances lie and which country is willing to interfere with our elections on our behalf.
That's a really bad idea.

>>124321

If we were going to do it that way, I'd rather keep our allies and befriend the Chinese. They've a larger economy and we gain more leverage over their proxy North Korea in the process too.

>>124322
>>124332
NATO is antiquated. If we are to build an ethnoempire that will leave its mark upon the world, then we must drop the degenerate multicultural global liberalism of socialist Europe and embrace Putin as a friend. I believe that Trump has the balls to do it too, damn the hawkish rinos and traitorous liberals.