http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/01/gop-wants-to-eliminate-shadowy-doj-slush-fund-bankrolling-leftist-groups.html
And for the inevitable
>faux news
Heres two more on the subject
http://www.forbes.com/sites/legalnewsline/2017/01/25/house-republicans-target-slush-funds-created-by-doj-lawsuits/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-justice-departments-bank-settlement-slush-fund/2016/08/31/a3b4da7a-6eec-11e6-8365-b19e428a975e_story.html
Synopsis:
>DoJ offers companies getting hit with lawsuits a plea deal if they make donations to various non-victim entities
>Roughly 3 billion dollars were disbursed in this manner
>This may or may not be illegal depending on constitutional interpretations
>>116869
>various non-victim entities
Is there a list of these nefarious leftist groups?
>>118263
Something tells me that if they showed the list, it would be full of charities like The United Way or the March of Dimes, all technical leftist for their wealth redistribution, but in reality non-political. Even The Red Cross is technically a leftist organization.
>>118276
>Something tells me that if they showed the list
Don't worry they will.
>it would be full of groups with financial and personnel ties to the Clinton campaign
FTFY. Can't wait to see the charges.
>>118276
>The Red Cross
In the future the fascists will call themselves antifascists.
>>118263
According to the link at the end of the forbes article the house of representitives has been waiting for a full list of the beneficiaries since Lynch was the AG. It exists somewhere already, just need to dig for it. So far the only names that have come up are
>La Raza
>National Community Reinvestment Coalition
>National Urban League
>Coast Guard Alumni
>>118650
From the WaPo article's sources
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/holders-bank-of-america-settlement-includes-payoffs-to-democrat-groups/
Focuses on only one case, but all beneficiaries were politically active leftist groups.