Milo Yiannopoulos disinvited from CPAC amid tape controversy

While I find him to be more of an entertainer than a serious speaker, he is right in that there's no reason children shouldn't be allowed to consent to a sexual relationship with an adult. I'm not saying it should be celebrated but there's certainly no reason to criminalize the very existence of said relationship when rape laws are already in effect, specially (but not limited to) younger boys and older women as well.

>>113381

Kys, bro, everyone knows that shit is nasty.

I think I'll just sit here and enjoy the schadenfreude.

>>113386
just like ur mum lmao

>>113368

It's always funny when officials trying to claim moral high ground claim to be shocked by new revelations, because Milo's said many times that he has no problem with hebephilia in the homosexual community and has even suggested in the past that all adolescent boys, on discovering they are gay, should have an older man help them explore their sexuality the way he did.

It's this combination of how a video has to be "new" to make the news (fault of 24-hour TV media -- print journalism with long-term investigations usually avoids this), and how a video has to make the news for officials to give a shit about it, that makes me laugh with nausea.

FAMILY VALUES?

SAD.

He tried to drop one of the final redpills IRL and got btfo for it.

Good, fuck redpills and fuck him. Stay drug free and you'll do just fine.

>>113368
Glad people are becomming aware of this. He admitted this shit in a youtube video, but fanbois ignore things like that.

He needs to disappear. Why did we want a low quality version of Ann Coulter.

>>113368
shits nasty, get him out of here

His book is cancelled too.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/breaking-simon-schuster-cancels-publication-of-milo-yiannopouloss-book/

I knew that this would happen after the Bill Maher appearance. They wanted Bill to destroy him instead he found common ground. They were outraged.

Breitbart is getting ready to fire him.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/02/20/breitbart-news-may-boot-milo-yiannopoulos-over-sex-comments.html

It's over.

>>113429
>They wanted Bill to destroy him
that was never going to happen. maybe trevor noah but not maher

>>113429
Ahahahaha

>yabbadabbadopoulos

>>113429
This is hilarious. Now every time Milo opens his mouth people can just shout "child fucker."

>>113420
Because the Left is so disgusting right now people will cling to anyone taking it on like a drowning man clinging to something buoyant. Trump proved that.

>>113368
>Pearl clutching and taking shit out of context
>aligning yourself with shadowy deep state entities
>Wonder why people hate you and keep referring to you as fake news

Coming up next: Top 10 Reasons why Lena Dunham is Crucial to Fighting Rape Culture.

>>113496
What source would you prefer?

>>113465
Why do people care about college SJWs so much? Why can't they focus on the corporate greed and corruption that is destroying everything around us?

>>113518
>why won't people join my communism roleplay club

>>113531

>implying corporate corruption has anything to do with partisan activity

>>113533
>thinking anyone here is young enough to fall for communism

>>113554

>implying anyone that doesn't suck the corporate dick is a communist

Fuck off Schlomo

>>113556
Do you think this gets better by using a /pol/ word

Just go home

>>113518

This. Why are so many organisations cowtowing to fucking 20-something extremist weirdos left and right? Most people don't give a fuck.

>>113561
Maybe they're trying to make them care.

>>113561
At the risk of sounding like some tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist, it honestly feels like controlled opposition to keep people distracted from the vast income disparity between the top 1% and everyone else, or at least it was. It kind of spiraled out of control in the past few years though which resulted in the clusterfuck we have now.

>>113518
i be afraid if the intercultural part of our future generation would believe communism is a good thing.

>>113564

The extremists, sure. Why are organisations getting involved by letting themselves be bullied by a bunch of weirdos?

>>113566

I think it's less a conspiracy and more just human weakness going after low hanging fruit. The whole Occupy thing was such a damp squib, no one has any clue what to do about that. I doubt we're anywhere near enough of a threat that any effort needs to be put into distracting us, I think we do that fine on our own.
But wherever it comes from, yeah, it's definitely all a distraction.

>>113368
>politico
discarded & reported

>>113368
I heard Milo talking about being in a gangbang when he was 13. He probably thinks all kids should experience it

>>113573
Good to see it still triggers you.

>>113518
Because in case you haven't noticed, those SJWs are not relegated to colleges. Candidates for the DNC chair can echo them completely by highlighting themselves as the person to "shut down other white people." Bernie Sanders ex-press secretary couldn't even call what the Chicago Four did a hate crime and weeks before that had only "poor white people," to say when it became obvious political violence was only going one way. All the major social media platforms are run by the same SJW clique in the bay and that bias filters down not just to the rest of the country, but the world itself. Academia is completely infested top to bottom with unapologetic communists who have no problem preaching genocide with taxpayer dollars but then lose their sanity and justify violence if some neo-nazi larper even opens their mouth. Middle-school teachers are now running open political cults designed to foment violence against anyone they dislike. Pre-school teachers are now chanting for violent reparations based on race.

All of that may seem over the top and fabricated, but it's real. All of it. As long as this is happening you will get more Milos because as lousy a person as he is, he was one of the few actually saying something about it. I'm a center-left person, but I've completely lost faith in the left's ability to keep its own crazies in check. There's nothing but pussyfooted excuses when someone criticizes it. When someone says whining about white privilege and justifying double standards is counter-productive they're immediately written off and the extremists only tighten their grip.

I don't like the blatant corporatism or the pet issues the right is obsessed with, but as long as the left looks like this I will never vote for it ever again and I will support anyone trying to either take it down or reform it into something productive, even scum like Milo.

>>113590
>Candidates for the DNC chair can echo them completely by highlighting themselves as the person to "shut down other white people.
That's like saying Jim Gilmore represented all the GOP nominees. Those extremists don't represent the DNC any more than the Richard Spencer represents modern conservatives.

It sounds like you have been whipped into a frenzy about SJWs by unscrupulous, hypocritical outrage merchants who over-magnify every insignificant tweet they see so they can monetize your disgust.

>>113600
And yet, not a single person on that stage or in the crowd had anything negative to say about that DNC chair candidates words. Not a single one of her opponents said anything against it and not a single person in the crowd booed or made their displeasure known.

I am in a frenzy, because everything I mentioned in that post is true (and can be proved) and instead of taking that on people like you will do exactly what you're doing right here. You'll make excuses for why it doesn't matter. You'll obfuscate and twist and mutter platitudes until your opposition is just tired of dealing with you and nothing ends up resolved. You're giving cover to those elements with every mealy mouthed "but those aren't the majority," knee-jerk excuses. They may not be the majority, but they are in control and they are the ones calling the shots.

You're inertia and reluctance to even consider your side is infested with extremists who need the boot is why people like Milo will continue to profit and thrive.

>>113501
One that agrees with his preexisting worldview

>>113368
this has to be fabricated. /pol/ was going on about trying to fit him up as a pedo.
Don't like the guy but if he's innocent of something he's accused of he still deserves to be cleared of it

>>113601
fucking this

"don't tar us with the same brush as those extremists!!" doesn't actually fucking work unless you actually shun them. you guys have been perfectly content to let #killallwhitepeople types run rampant, so when it comes back to bite you don't come crying to us about it.

>>113613
The problem with this mentality is that you're on an anonymous message board and that you have no idea who you're talking to at any given time.

>>113590
Honestly, the "crazy" of the GOP isn't exactly being checked either. It just directs its destructive energy at institutions instead of people.

>>113614
>>113615
We don't give a fuck about your pussy liberal opinions

>>113616
>We
Who do you think you are?

>>113620
That's the correct pronoun given the statement.

Got a problem, bitch? Why don't you post some more memes.

>>113616
milo is a filthy turd burglar who gets off on trumps fecal fumes

>>113625
Good opinion.

>>113616
>>113624

Why is it that whenever someone says something relatively articulate and substantial against the left one of you retards chimes in with something super low-hanging and shitposty like this that sucks up all the replies? It's almost like you're trying to make it so the serious discussion doesn't happen at all.

>>113663
Not that Anon, but I'm pretty sure it's because reactionary Trump apologists are insufferable for their bubbleworld mentality of conservative arrogance and pretension, and that ""someone"" wants to pop the bubble by challenging them but instead enjoy triggering their hypersensitive outrage buttons.

>>113671
Bullshit. Everytime one of these threads has a concise explanation for why people are siding with the caustic forces on the right by drawing up a very long laundry list of the horrific nonsense the left has turned into it's almost immediately followed up with some retard voicing a completely over the top rightwing opinion as if they're not so much trying to voice anything as they are trying to act like a caricature. Shitposts like this >>113616 seem to keep happening over and over after posts like >>113613 >>113601 >>113590 explain why people like Milo and Trump enjoy support, even among centrists and moderates on the left.

And sure enough, those shitposts suck up all the replies and complete distract from any point made beforehand.

>>113676
So if I understand you correctly, you're assuming that because some pseudo-intellectual trump apologist "conservatives" have a conversation and then one of your like minded retarded reactionary brethren chimes in with his fervent cheerleading, that it's somehow a false flag. How typical. Should someone alert Alex Jones of the new CTR/Crew OP in full force?

>>113368
Finally fuck this fagget

Being unironically a faggot is only entertaining on the Internet and even then in moderate doses

>>113681
Once or twice and I'd agree with you, but it keeps fucking happening. Some of these threads have been completely riddled with outright shitposting from the left before. >>102125

Why wouldn't this one? Every single time someone says something the leftwing posters can't counter with their excuses the irrelevant shitposting and over the top nonsense starts happening.

>>113688
>Once or twice and I'd agree with you, but it keeps fucking happening.
You're not the only one who's noticed it. It's their way of sliding the thread.

I've watched the same thing happen, a thread gets to the point where someone's unable to keep up and fire back in an argument and suddenly it's like trashy Facebook/YouTube comment city for a few minutes until the thread topic changes or gets slid far enough into inactivity.

>>113688
Yet another example here >>107298

>>113663
>Why is it that whenever someone says something relatively articulate and substantial against the left one of you retards chimes in
That's not what's happening, you fucking liar.

Heres what happens.
>Anons are talking about news.
>ENTER /leftypol/
>lefty commies pretend yo talk about news
>every post is an attempt to denigrade right wingers and encourage communism
>anon, who has seen this before, calls the commies out


Repeat.

>>113707

Like this faggot >>113671

His whole purpose for being here is to talk shit about Trump. Only the left is doing this, which is why you often see them getting accused of communist subversion.

>>113707
If he was honestly trying to call them out then stupid shit like >>113616 does nothing to help. It's simple shitposting that can be easily ignored and makes the people who actually have points disappear in the ensuing white noise. The posts above his were doing just fine in pointing out the left is full of shit without his nonsense. It's so counter-productive that it's hard to contemplate anyone doing this except to undercut the like-minded arguments above it, deflect from criticism, and slide the thread like >>113692 mentioned.

>>113711
That was my post and I admit it was low quality. I can see how it looks like an attempt to muddy the waters. But I am no shill, just suck of commies in every thread.

>>113711
Im not so sure that it is counter productive, though.

Giving well reasoned counter arguments to rabid dogs is not appropriate. If i see someone spreading commie bullshit, im going to call it out.

It's not my fault if they choose to shitpost threads to death after they've given up on persuasive tactics.

You'd rather try to have conversations with people who only want control? Why?

>>113719
Because if you have the more persuasive point others around you will be convinced. They will be even more convinced if the opposition's only recourse is to throw their arms up, slap the board off the table, and start masturbating with ketchup to make everyone think they were never serious in the first place and so lost nothing at all.

"I was only pretending to be retarded," tactics are the easiest and most obvious indication of "I lost but I'm too fucking stubborn to admit it," there is. Don't give them shitposts and low-effort nonsense to springboard off of.

As a socialist, watching the White Nationalists try to mount a coup against the alt-lite America Firsters and the subsequent infighting is gorgeous and has made my whole week.

Meanwhile we still have 4 years to peel off voters one by one by campaigning against cuts to medicaid and regional development agencies

>>113730
Funny how you didn't mention reigning in antifa, or doing away with rampant identity politics (for one laughing about infighting seems silly to ignore that), or fixing the complete dependency on corporatism the Democrats are addled with, or coming up with any solution to problems with immigration or education.

As a socialist, you're not peeling anyone off except those who are already converted. Unless you do something major and massive about your own terrible elements you're not going anywhere the Alt-right isn't either.

Sacked in the morning.

>>113729
Giving children a seat at the adult's table may be polite, but it leads to a children running our government.

Enough with this shit. Stop being kind to propagandists. It's a guaranteed loss.

>>113381
Young kids aren't mature enough to even know how to make that decision. Not only that, the huge risk of abuse because adults are naturally bigger and more dominant than kids. Just because you believe your were born NAMBLA man, doesn't mean it's right.

>>113747
I'm not being kind to them, I'm just not giving them ammunition or giving them excuses to ignore the points that make them uncomfortable. I'm not telling you to roll over, I'm saying say something more substantial and convincing than "fuck you pussy!" because that shit doesn't accomplish anything.

>>113749
consider this: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.

Is it worth your time to intelligently refute every "argument" made by these people?

When somone makes a post that is essentially
>fuck America

My response is
>fuck traitors

To give this person a more substantial refutation would elevate his shitpost to a higher level than deserved.

We've been doing this forever, no matter how batshit and wrong their statements are. They need to be mocked, not respected.

>>113708
Is there some kind of manual or script where you get your hyperbolic bullshit from?

>>113756
Just been chatting with leftist animals for a while. They're the ones on a script.

>>113748
That implies there's something inherently harmful about having sex. I think it's the same logic as driving, even if a kid knew how to drive you wouldn't let him do so because of the risks involved. Problem then, are the risks, not driving per se.

So the new-right tries to claim the left ate pedos, but they're really the pedos?

>>113368
>no one mentions pizzagate

>>113821
Not really, the people who've been trying to normalize it are mostly on the left. Hell, take something tangentially related to Milo, the gamergate nonsense, and compare the surprisingly large amount of kiddy fappers on the anti side where all the hardcore leftists generally reside.

>>113804
>That implies there's something inherently harmful about having sex
>big penis in small vagina
that's one for a start

>>113833
>anti-gamergate kiddie fappers
Where? I only know Aliso Rapp.

>>113835
sex is not limited to coitus

>>113386
Not really though.

Forcing them to do anything against their will is indeed very nasty, but if they are willing I really don't see a problem.

>>113368
Ah...Poor soul..Still buying the book though. Pretty sad how the ignorant misinterpreted dark fucked up humor and edginess as full truth.

What's funny is that he is under scrutiny, but called out pedophiles( John Podesta and co. for an example) are not getting as nearly as much shit as Milo is..
Things occur in ebbs and flows.
Milo will come out strong from this.

>>113804
Sex is inherently risky and we don't have a way to control for all the risks when it comes to children. It's also objectifying. Children can't get anything useful from that relationship; all the benefit is on the adult's end. We do not want as a society to reach a place where adults are treating children as a commodity.

More importantly, children are almost always in a sort of relationship with a power-dynamic with an adult. They may depend entirely on the adult to meet their needs and are essentially at the mercy of the adult. Even if a child can recognize he's is at risk, they may lack the understanding of how to seek help.

It's disgusting how some folks on the right are trying to defend pedophilia now. It seems like much of the political right loses any concept of shame with each passing day it seems. Ever since Trump has come into office, they've shown their true colors.

Even right wing conspiracy theories revolve around sex with children. Speak whatever you want in any public space you want. But stay away from my kids if you consider yourself alt-right.

>>113368
So it's ok that a woman can rape a boy and make him pay child support when he grows up but a gay teen can't consent to a gay man.

But Lena Dunham can molest her little sister and that's fine too.

These libtards just laugh and cuss, and think they are the shit. Milo actually knows how to debate like a civil person.

>>113985
I am consistently reminded just how braindead the alt right are

>>113611
The videos are on youtube for all to see.

You fanboys need to face reality.

>>113841
SarahButts too.

>>114065
I am consistently reminded how easy you people buy OTT nonsense from trolls because it confirms your shallow as fuck bias.

>>114071
Who is "you people" ?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/02/21/the-96-hours-that-brought-down-milo-yiannopoulos/

>>113894
They cancelled the book.

>>114094
Yeah SandS cancelled the publishing..but that doesnt mean it wont EVER be published......

Bunch of pedos up in here, I had no idea /news/ was so degenerate.


>Lord, I was born a NAMBLA mannnn...
>trying to fuck kids the best I can...
>and when I'm hard for kids,
>I hope you'll understand,
>That I was born a NAMBLA man.

>talking about his own experience of being molested
>gets taken out of context and accused of being a pedo

the left sure has changed, wasnt that long ago that they defended actual pedos and child molesters.

haha. just the usual for the left i suppose,
a bunch of useful idiots using whatever they can to attack someone that disagrees with them.

i dont have any sympathy for the faggot though, he probably deserves this.

>>114136
>muh leftist boogeyman

>>114143
Do you think that ignorance is contagious?

I'm not so sure it works that way, stupid shit.

>>114146
Do you ever get tired of being a right wing moral crusader?

>>114157
Do you ever get tired of trying to destroy goodness?

>>114136
He wasn't just talking about his own experiances, he was talking about female teachers fucking their students at one point. You need to watch the videos for yourself rather than blindly accepting his half assed apology.

>>114165
>advocating paedophilia
>goodness

>>114082
People who make me pray for the day of the rope and furnace.

>>114173
That came out of nowhere. Try to follow the thread.

I've only advocated for America.

you know he retracted that statement in a press conference. my theory is that the reason he said that is because he was molested himself and because he was traumatized by it he wanted to have some sense of control over it. to do that, he made it seem like he was a willing participant and said that 13 year olds can consent. just some pop psychology.

>>114165
Ironic shit posting is still shit posting

>>114173
yes that greentext is correct

>>114176
No, you're advocating for pedophilia.

>>114184
>just some pop psychology.
not really,
its just a predetermined truth that cannot be questioned.

>>114204
>shouting racist and sexist isn't working?
>CHILD MOLESTER

Oh no how will we ever stop the left? Lol

>>114221
You're literally defending a man boy love advocate.

He's not wrong, he's just an asshole - and that's his purpose, he's a committed troll.

I used to think that anti-pedophilia was just a kneejerk from cultural taboo - but I've settled on a compromise: no matter the precise reasons, our culture doesn't currently provide an acceptable niche for pederasty, and therefore it should be avoided until we figure out how to better handle it.

the caveat is that we SHOULD try to figure it out - but as long as the subject remains taboo, we're basically waiting to get lucky. It'd be far better to dismantle the taboo, talk about it reasonably, and come to a better understanding about the pros and cons of the kind of same-sex intergenerational relationships he's talking about seeing in ancient rome.

>>113368
The only shit he's known for is his support on the /v/&/pol/ movement known as Gamergate.

Which is why you got plenty of bastards coming here to defend his ass; they're all "gamers" that despise identity politics above all else.

>>114227
And?

Milo's rhetorical enemies didn't defeat him, he fell on his own sword. Everything he's said about the left is still as true now as it was four days ago and that's what most people were supporting him for.

>>114225
Keep on thoughtlessly attacking, genius. At this rate we'll have 100 years of republican dominance.

>>113708

Anon, what if I told you that not all leftists are communists. What if I told you that not all people against Trump are leftists. Try to wrap your mind around this. Tell us how you feel.

>>114338
Communism is a spectrum. All leftists are on it somewhere.

>>114339
My bad, this is backwards.

>>114243
>>114338
>>113368

if Milo claims the tapes were edited deceptively, than all we need is the source or footage to determine if he is speaking the truth.

...and I did find it. It was sarcasm...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA30TrArlpk

Nothing more to discuss.

>>114338
you can't win an argument with an idiot unless you get down to his level, and even then he has much more experience being one than you.

While it's hard to feel bad for someone like Milo, who apparently devotes every waking moment to being a cunt to everyone and anyone he disagrees with, it's scary to think that an examination of human sexuality and the nuances of who can give informed consent, albeit in a rather cavalier manner, can mean the end of someone's career.

I totally disagree with him on this issue and believe there needs to be a hard and fast rule regarding the age of consent, but I'm sure there are some 14 year-olds who could give informed consent. I probably could have. And discussing whether or not those policies are appropriate shouldn't mean that you're publicly shamed and lose your livelihood.

Not that I feel bad for Milo. He seems like a thoroughly shit individual. But I do feel bad for speech in this country.

>>114341
It's not sarcasm you idiot. He's talked sbout this before and it is fucked up.

He was molested around age 14 by a priest. Thst priest is likely fucking kids to this day.

He also admitted to going to Hollywood jew partys with "very young boys"

It's good he's getting out of breitbarts way.

Now he needs to do something about the rape.

>>114344
Don't you see who's winning now? Trumps election was a huge blow to the integrity of the liberal media and exposed alot of corruption in D.C. The Authoritarians have won and free speech has died thanks to this polarizing election.

I didn't like either candidate, but my spidey senses are telling me those deleted Hillary emails that the public has no access to had something to do with the situation we are in right now. Why would the emails she didn't delete incriminate her for corruption? (Not illegal but def immoral) unless there was something larger she was hiding.

Anon I sound paranoid, but that deposition with Comey about the emails where he said the information contained in those emails are owned by a third party.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_jSKyjXI3A

>>114347

The fuck does Hillary's email server have to do with this?

>>114349
If only I knew. It was clear in his testimony he wasn't covering Hillary's ass, he was covering someone else. I sound paranoid but I think most of these political events in the past 2 years has been intentional. By who or what? I don't know. All I know is that it is someone who doesn't like liberal media and democratically elected representatives.

>>114350

Are you for real? What does Hillary's email server have to do with Milo Yiannopoulos getting disinvited from CPAC?

>>114352
You ended your comment with free speech and that is what I'm commenting on. I think trump getting elected was intentional, and all this political fallout is too. You seem to have your wits about you so I just wanted to leave that, in hopes you could do some digging yourself.

>>114352
inb4 pizzagate and podesta emails

>>114338
Not that anon, but I've found a lot of leftists are communists, they just don't realize it because the taboo of the word has prevented the purveyors of leftist politics from using it.

Make no mistake, people who view Marx with anything resembling positivity; who have nothing but disdain or negative views towards the concept of the nation-state; who subscribe to some kind of relativistic solidarity world view over recognition of uncomfortable facts; who have a tendency to characterize all of their opposition as dangerous instead of simply political dissent; who worship the nebulous idea of progress despite it rarely being anything but a dogmatic label; who tend to have negative views of capitalism or Western civilization; who view entire demographics as collectives instead of the individuals they are; these things all point towards being a communist or at least highly sympathetic to their ideas.

The nature of modern academia has made it impossible to tell who is or isn't one based on labels, but following patterns of behavior makes it obvious, there are lots of communists about and a lot of people have subscribed to their ideas without critically analyzing them because those ideas are framed around moral imperatives where any dissent is not just disagreement but a moral blight of impurity.

>>114411
Thanks for the explanation, Dr. Friedman.

http://www.businessinsider.com/milo-yiannopoulos-reagan-battalion-anonymous-twitter-2017-2

>>114412
We recognize defining things by self-professed labels as tenuous at best all the time. The Family Research Council or the Democratic People's Republic of Korea for instance. Looking at behavior and ideas, past stated self-professed labels is a better way to accurately label something.

Avoiding the taboo of the communist label has allowed many who are indeed communists to rebrand their politics and sell them to people who would otherwise tune them out. This filter continues to work long after the fact as well, with those espousing these ideas, but not the labels, further informing people down the line. How do you think so many sociology departments are not just dominated by the left, but by people who are in no way moderate in their leftism?

If you disagree please say so, but explain why you think I'm wrong in looking at the way people behave and the ideas they espouse foremost in labeling. Catty nonsense won't get you anywhere.

>>114411
This is correct. Its why I don't hold back from calling communists what they are.

It does not matter if they don't realize they're commies.

Leftists never admit what their politics are, so their denial is irrelevant.

>>114418
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWBHdc1TK98

>the left should shun its extermists


>in a thread about milo lusting for teen boys

>people still defending him
i can taste the irony

I just have one question for milo why does he think its good to fuck 13 year old boys but not girls is he a sexist or some shit. I mean fuck if your going to be that much of a deviant why critizize the more natrual of the two choices. Unless he is just a freak that hates vagina and enjoys little boy ass.
Prove me wrong poltards. You supported a nambla member and you should feel shame.

>>114420
Hey man i just want every one to have acess to the same quality of health care congress does. Its the least the american people deserve because they actually work for a living.

>>114516
>Hey man i just want every one to have acess to the same quality of health care congress does.

Why not congress have the access that they can pay for? Congress should have to buy into the private market just as everyone else. They should not be subsidized.

>Its the least the american people deserve because they actually work for a living.

Haha no.

One, it cost too much.

Two, profit incentive guarantees that we have the best HC in the world. It's private American medical breakthroughs that are pioneering healthcare, not socialized medicine.

Three, these people are not owed anything by society or government. Healthcare is not a right.

And finally, limited healthcare is one of the best ways of weeding out undesirables in the American system. You always have to have some mechanism in place to clean out the bottom rung of society.

>>114516
Just die, government worshipping moron.

>>114417
So its these "Reagan Battalion" guys behind his uprooting?

>>114552
this was posted a day before all this.
>>>/pol/113460155

>>114555
Call me edgy, but I think with these liberals, that getting rid of them is not enough. You must hurt them, hurt them so bad that they want to die; destroy their families, and utterly break them, because beating them is not enough. The only way for them to pay is pain that they'll wish for death. And then, when they ask for it, you whisper back no. This isn't about justice or saving the nation, this is about revenge, and Trump was just the beginning. The left's pain has just began.

>>114558
Trump isn't going to do shit you 13 year old child. He's not going to start any pogroms or turn us into some fascist ethnostate. He can still seriously fuck things up, but it would be more out of ignorance and incompetence then direct maliciousness. There will be no direct government targeting of Americans for political beliefs.

>>114558
Woah, edgy.

>>114560
>Trump isn't going to do shit you 13 year old child. He's not going to start any pogroms or turn us into some fascist ethnostate. He can still seriously fuck things up, but it would be more out of ignorance and incompetence then direct maliciousness. There will be no direct government targeting of Americans for political beliefs.
Tell that to Obama, who was dumping chemicals into conservative water supplies to turn us all into faggots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpiUfb7adPE&ab_channel=TheAlexJonesChannel

>>114558
>le alt right flase flagger

WTF I'M A COMMUNIST NOW

>>114567
well he did an excellent job.

>>114555
Man thats crazy. So they're basically just flinging shit at these right-wing personalities in the hopes that they will be destroyed before they can fully take off. This party man thing is taking some wild turns.

>>114567
>Alex Jones
Ig I ever become a male escort, i'm going to name myself Alex Moans of InfoWhores

>>114508
The Left should shun its extremists because it's not even trying anymore. The Left being full of unrepentant extremists is why Milo ever had a following at all. Nobody was listening to him to hear his support of Catholicism.

>>114513
No, I supported someone pointing out the Left has lost its fucking mind. Even then Milo was only useful as a troll to piss people off rather than counter ideas. Why should anyone feel any retroactive shame for supporting him in the past given his words of the present? Are you one of those silly people who think supporting someone for one thing at one time translates to infinite support for everything they've said or will ever say? You don't give a shit about abuse, you're just a partisan hack trying to rub your opposition's face in a mess you think they should own up to for some reason.

>>114558
Congratulations Mr. Trapezoid, you're edgy.

>>113676
Yeah but those shitposts are easy to reply to. Long, well thought out posts are such a drag to try and read when I could just tell some shitpost to fuck off and feel smug

>>113381
>children with adults.

Nah, man; you talking crazy talk. If anything we should have a range of ages: if you are within X number of years of the younger partner's age.

I think a reasonable range would be 5-7 years. So a 13 year old can date an 18 year old and so on.

>>113590
This articulates why the DNC has lost my vote for the foreseeable future.

>>114741
You make your choices on the real important issues.

This is why America needs to be made great again.

>>114741
The two front runners for the DNC chair are a perfect encapsulation of everything wrong with the party. You have a dyed in the wool corporatist on one hand, and a caustic, communist ideologue on the other.

>>115715
>You have a dyed in the wool corporatist on one hand

Who do we have to blame for that? It was conservative supreme court judges and the GOP that threw their support behind Citizens United.

Now anyone that isn't a billionaire that wants to gain the level of prominence to stand a chance in elections and wants to garner support from other politicians once in office needs corporate backing to gain campaign resources and support from lobbyists for their platform.

The DNC is a private enterprise just like the GOP, but at least democrats haven't displayed such naked ambition to preference corporate welfare over the welfare of the working class in their constituencies.

>>113590

>political violence was only going one way.

True; white supremacists have killed people on more than one occasion since trump's election.

Why on earth would bernie sanders address each of the literally hundreds of hate crimes, majority from the far-right, reported since the election? Why would you expect him to?

>>114741
vote for policies, anon, not parties or people

>>115747
Only one side generally has proof though. All those "literally hundreds," of reported hate crimes are most likely the same kind of hyperbolic fake hate crimes that get publicized and quickly outed as nothing but fabrications. When one side produces video of people getting jumped while the other is relegated to nothing but impotent Facebook posts it's a little more evident which side is telling the truth.

Secondly, you should improve your reading comprehension. I was talking about Symone Sanders, his ex press secretary, not Sanders himself, and her sarcastic "poor white people," remark was in reaction to one such incident of left on right violence captured on camera.

>>115744
And instead of trying to exercise the demon they jumped right into the infernal summoning pit with them. No excuses. The Democrats are as bought and paid for as the GOP, they just pretend they're not. One look at Hillary's largest donors or her infamous private vs public faces remarks makes that obvious.

The Democrats are as corporatist as the GOP, and in addition to that they bring along the usual insanity that plagues anything vaguely associated with the left in general.

>>115781
>hillary's top donors
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ivonaiacob/2016/05/27/top-donors-hillary-clinton-superpac/#7124ec874105

None of these people is anywhere near as bad, or donated as much, as Adleson, The Mercers, Steve Case, et. al.

>>115839
Don't forget about Koch and Waltons, the richest family in america

>>115839
>We're slightly less bought than those other guys and you get a white privilege lecture for free!
Sounds like a winning campaign slogan.

>>115851
>slightly less bought
It's at least an order of magnitude less.

Republicans are the party of the rich.
Democrats are the party of the poor.
If you're middle class you just get fucked.

>>115852
That kind of simple-minded dichotomy isn't going to work either. Bought is bought. I'm not playing this arbitrary partisan game where 50 million dollars is worse than 25 million when it makes no discernible difference to anyone who doesn't regularly handle that kind of money anyway. Obama's campaign was a virtual who's who of influential moguls. Nobody who gets to the position of running for the office is innocent of this, Democrat or Republican, and pointing fingers is a useless game to me for that reason.

And in addition to all that corruptness is the the insane identity politics of the left currently burning that wing down to nothing but purity tests and long-winded moralizing. If I only have two corrupt parties to choose from, I'm going to go with the one that isn't infested with those who have twisted their cognitive functions into validating the most egregious of double standards. I'm going to pick the one that doesn't portray people like me as the progenitor of every societal evil.

>>115781
>private vs public faces comment
Honestly, I never quite understood the outrage about that. It is obvious to even the most casual observer that no elected official on the federal level is ever fully true to their campaign rhetoric. Compromises are necessary to achieve results, but compromise is not something that usually sells well on the campaign trail. I always interpreted her statement as a rare acknowledgement of that fact and while I never was a big fan of her, that bit actually made me mpre sympathetic towards her because I thought it showed that she knew what would be necessary to achieve results - conpromise.

But apparently people will be happy to pretend politicians usually tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and crucify her for not living up to that standard.

>>115886
>it showed that she knew what would be necessary to achieve results - conpromise.

Which is exactly how the Clintons were able to make progress on an issue such as gay rights, which is a great illustration of why it's shitty to be so cynical of career politicians who actually get shit done.

They obviously could never have said something like "Gay marriage yes!" in 1992 even if they believed it with all their hearts. They couldn't even openly acknowledge a fundamental equality of gay relationships or love at the time -- it was certainly unmentionable to even hint at being supportive of such an issue to be elected in Arkansas. Yet as president Bill got Don't Ask Don't Tell passed, which was an enormous advancement in gay rights over the previous "fuck off faggots" policy of the military, which as you may remember George W reinstated as soon as he took office. Now while DADT was not well-implemented, mostly because the JAG and standing army was chronically underworked (Stand by to stand by!). Anyway, during 2008 DADT was the new evil because the ban on gays in general was supposed to be lifted entirely, so Hillary's previous statements in attempting to get DADT passed in an era where some Republicans literally thought gays would be better off exterminated were now used *against* her, just as she and Obama would both be criticized for not saying they support marriage equality in 2008. All this despite the fact the were it not for the Clintons gays would be assfucked far more than they are now, but this time in an unenjoyable way.

The point is, fuck people who act proudly cynical about career politicians. /rant

>>115903
I knew this was progressive trash before reading it

>>115905
>>>/pol/

>>115907
>lefty spews propaganda

>someone calls bullshit

>REEEEEEEE

every time. Its just like how you block traffic as a protest, then claim your victim status upon being arrested.

>>115915
Translation: What really happened is that two /pol/tard sperglords acted like this was /pol/ and got told to go back to where they came from.

>>115932
4chan always had ethnoconservative leanings. /pol/ is 4chan when it comes to politics and arguably the new face of 4chan. liberals on this site are the minority.

>>113368
>freespeech is for everyone
>peedo speeches
>social justice for marginalised group
>you are now a racist for disagreeing with paedophilia

>>115975
>we've always been at war with eurasia
>newspeak is truth

>>113465
>>113590
>>113676
>>113708
>>113833
>>114136
>>114232
>>114420
>>114683
>>115860
>Thinks the left is the crazy one going off the rails when the right spent the last two decades demanding that the entire union bow to their absurd religious whims, started multiple dumb ass wars and called anyone who thought we shouldn't be there, a traitor. Spent 8 years grinding the government to a halt, filibustering bills they agreed with until a democrat was behind them. Claimed to the very end that the first black president must have been a foreigner in order to discredit him (gee i wonder if that in any way resulted in a higher racial conscious today). Threw shitfits every Christmas because they thought they were being persecuted. Tried to ban Harry Potter in schools because it "encouraged witchcraft". Dragged their feet on marijuana, a drug which everybody knew was safe because "Think of The Children". Did everything to gut social programs "except the ones they used" so that they could put more money in an overly bloated military. Denied evolution even in the face of overwhelming evidence. Denied anthropocentric climate change despite overwhelming evidence. And other assorted bullshit.

You claim that the lunacy of the left created the alt-right but you neglect that the college aged left of today grew up in an age of the right acting like spoiled children and got their idea of "normal" politics therein.

>>113688
>>113707
>>115915

>Being this delusional
By far the grand majority of shit posting on this site comes from the right, alt-right and especially white nationalists.

>>115991
>the college aged left of today grew up in an age of the right acting like spoiled children and got their idea of "normal" politics therein
Is that this "Christian Right" that I keep hearing about? Apparently they're hypocritical jackasses?

>>116011
Right wing SJWs calling themselves "The Moral Majority".

>>115991
>(gee i wonder if that in any way resulted in a higher racial conscious today)
it didnt, or at least had a very minor role in it.

>>113899
>Children can't get anything useful from that relationship; all the benefit is on the adult's end
Sex can be considered both an end and a means to an end, that goes for children as well

>>115975
>liberals on this site are the minority
Revisionism or shit posting either way stop it.

>>114568
How is it that whenever there is a liberal wingnut or even a rumor of a liberal wingnut it is taken as the gospel truth. Yet when an alt-righter is off the rails its just a false flag. Have you considered that those "kill whitey" blm tweets may have just been false flags?

>>116011
Yes and they pretty much ran the social politics show around the time modern sjw's were growing up and seeing politics for the first time.

>>116015
It probably was a minor role. I just wanted to convey that racial identity politics did not come out of the ether, are not new and certainly have never been exclusive to the left.

>>116026
>false equivalence

Liberals are so boring. Every post is the same.

>>116030
>>false equivalence
explain

>>115992
That's just because you can't tell when leftists start shit

Or you are one of them and just lying as usual

>>116038
The left wing actually is full of extremists, and the right wing is not.

>How is it that whenever there is a liberal wingnut or even a rumor of a liberal wingnut it is taken as the gospel truth. Yet when an alt-righter is off the rails its just a false flag. Have you considered that those "kill whitey" blm tweets may have just been false flags?

False comparison. The parties are different.

Stop acting like critisism needs to be given equally whenever liberal bullshit the focus.

>>116086
>the right wing is not.
May I remind you that Richard Spencer is FAR right to the point that he views democracy as a bane of human existence; and that most people associate Alt-right with White Supremacists, Social Darwinists, and Neo-Nazis.

Far-Right: Fascism
Right: Security
Left: Freedom
Far-Left: Anarchy

>>116086
Oh, so you are just completely ignoring the flaws on your side of the isle.

>>115886
>>115903

I think you're being overly gracious with someone who has shown their pragmatism is not a sacrifice of ideological purity in the name of practical accomplishment so much as it's opportunism. The Clinton's have never opposed anything until it became politically expedient to do it. 2008 was a year of sweeping Democratic victories, it was the perfect year to take a stand on issues like gay marriage, and yet neither Clinton nor Obama were certain of which way the wind was blowing so they held back. You can call it compromise, but it looks more like naked opportunism. You could make the argument that they are merely reflective of their constituents coming around on the issue, but then that gets in the way of their self-appointed positions as fighters on the very edge of social change.

I appreciate your words, but I don't buy them.

>>115983
He's not wrong though. 4chan has always had a decidedly contrarian streak that does not mix well with contemporary liberal/progressive politics.

>>115991
I never defended the right's pet issues. In fact, one of the reasons I abhor the modern left is because it has emulated the right in many of the same ways you're pointing out now, only it's gone even further off the reservation in comparison. The right is not the side popularizing the notion of justified political violence against rhetorical opposition. The right is not the side institutionalizing the advocacy of ethnic genocide in public education. The right is not the side embracing naked displays of racist double standards while mentally contorting itself into maintaining a self-appointed monopoly of morality. Complaining about a coffee cup ruining your Xmas cheer is not the same level as normalizing the notion of meeting mean words with violent action.

>>115992
We're not on /pol/, /b/, /tv/, /v/, or another other board fraught with frequent shitposting. This is /news/ and frequently discussions end up shitposted on this board when they turn against the left.

>>116088
You can find leftwing analogues of Richard Spencer at any moderate university and gaggles of them in particularly liberal ones. Spencer has no power beyond his words however, whereas the communists who echo his rhetoric from a leftwing POV are frequently professors and administrators within public education.

You will find no shortage of people on the left who see democracy as a liability too, especially given all the popular, yet erroneous, claims of it empowering Hitler's rise to power.

>>116101
You're refering to fucking Hippies; the same kind of lazy ass scums that used their spare time to force the government to form more Agencies and Acts such as the Civil Rights and the EPA.

Now they have no power thanks to social media and digital entertainment distracting them from a corporate takeover of the government.

>>116102
>corporate takeover of the government.
Words mean things.

>>116082
>That's just because you can't tell when leftists start shit
>They are totally there. They are just invisible. I'm not crazy.

Why does the alt-right always do this? They pretend they do not need proof because "you just need to see the world like I do man".

Like, when they claim that the only reason leftists (and moderates for that matter) are only not racist because they have never met blacks or Hispanics. As if liberals didn't primarily inhabit cities where there are a shit tone of them and with whom liberals interact with daily.

>>116103
ever since Citizens United, multinational corporations have literally become a fourth branch of American government, since campaign success will largely be a function of who can influence the dialectic and control the most resources, and accomplishing a given platform will depend on who controls the lobbyists.

>>116094
I don't mean to exonerate the left for their bullshit, nor necessarily demonize the right. I just wanted to dispel the notion that the modern left came out of nowhere under the power of their own hatred; and that the right had its own role in setting the stage for this type of rhetoric.

Also I wouldn't be so quick to play off the right as not being genocidal or even nonviolent for that matter, considering the rates of homeless teens who were gay kids disowned by their parents as well as those gay teens outright killed by their families. Which I would consider was also a contributing factor in the rabidness of LGBTQ politics today.

>>116104
because there is no fucking evidence.
they tell you green is blue and if you disagree you're duped by the blue is blue conspiracy or you're one of the conspirators.
if you give them evidence they argue it must be a deep conspiracy.
if you ask for convincing evidence they'll pussyfoot around the topic for the next 100 years.
Their playbook for being on the offensive is equally simple.
They project the naked corporatism, disinformation campaigns, and disdain for the working class characteristic of the GOP and right-wing medias onto democrats and call liberals communists..

>>116088
>that most people associate Alt-right with White Supremacists, Social Darwinists, and Neo-Nazis.
only because of media propaganda.

>>116114
From every news site that weren't critical on the Hippie-Left.

>>113368
It's surreal how calm and well-spoken posts on this board are, compared to the rest of this site

>>116104
Proof was posted. Two other threads were linked where once the thread's discussion had decidedly turned against a leftwing viewpoint the same kind of confusingly irrelevant shitposting started happening.

>>116108
>gay teens outright killed by their families

I'm sorry, but I've never heard of any kind of rampant murder of gay teens by the hands of their families in the US. Disowning, yes. Ostracizing, yes. Certainly the victims of crimes motivated by their orientations, yes. Wholesale murder by their families though? No. I think you're being incredibly hyperbolic in insinuating there was ever anything approaching that kind of dynamic in the US on any sort of scale beyond the occasional individual case.

And yes, the right certainly has people with genocidal ideas in its ranks, but they're not afforded privileged positions of power, nor are they given platforms for which to spread their ideas by means of public institutions. You can find fascists and communists in the US, but only the latter will have any kind of power. Fascists get punched for speaking while communists get to proselytize with taxpayer money and administrative support.

The left's current position didn't come out of nowhere and I have no illusions as to the right's vitriol in helping to contribute to it, but I think the left is just as responsible given it's maintained this illusion of itself being the sole arbiter of what is just, equal, and fair to the point its dogmas have become above reproach. Questioning leftwing politics is no longer simple disagreement, it's derided as reactionary in light of the blind worship words like progress enjoy. It's characterized as a moral failing to question the ideas of the left because it's elevated itself to a position where everyone opposing it is evil.

>>116119
>rampant
>Wholesale

Wow.

>>116126
?

>>116130

Straw men.

>>116133
How is pushing back against the notion of widespread familial murder of gay people ever existing in the US a strawman when that's exactly what the post quoted said?

>>116135
>widespread

There's another one.

>>116092
No. I'm well aware of the flaws on both sides.

The left is that much worse. Its not even close. The more i learn the more evident that is.

>>116147
>The more i learn the more evident that is.
A expert in the making I'm sure.

>>116138
If that wasn't implied what's the point of bringing it up in the first place? You can find individual murder cases between familial members for all sorts of motivations that aren't treated as societal epidemics worthy of political condemnation. The post even said "gay teens," with a plural implying it's a bigger and more widespread problem than you're giving room for here.

It's also rather lousy that you clearly disagree with the post you quoted, but are only inclined to make that known through a little semantic disagreement on technical argumentation rather than the points themselves.

>>116153
Thanks, you too.

>>116094
>He's not wrong though.
Yes it is.

>>116169
Besides the obvious like /lgbt/ please tell me which boards have a majority liberal presence. It certainly isn't /b/, /pol/, /v/, /tv/, or any of the sites most popular boards. You'd have a hard time making that argument even for this slow and relatively obscure board.

>>116020
It isn't revisionism. /pol/ is like the largest board by far.

You'd think they wouldn't be able to routinely fool the public into aligning with their agenda using loaded misleading headlines based on quotes taken out of context on website articles where the publishers know that the majority of their readership doesn't actually read the articles and form their own opinions, but it do.

>>116231
First of all, /b/ and /tv/ are not even close to conservative.
/v/, /pol/, /k/ and /biz/ are the only right wing boards.
/r9k/ are virgin anarchists
/cgl/, /lit/, /sci/, /mu/, and most weeb boards are beyond liberal.
Most of the rest are non-political/non partisan.

>>116233
Yes it is. /pol/ is the 4th largest board. You only think it's #1 because it was ffor 2 months during the election. That time is over now.

>>116272
So he was right then.

>>116119
>>116158
I did not mean to imply that it was anywhere near the scale of say, honor killings in the middle east. I am simply pushing back against the notion that liberals are the only ones with a violent philosophy. And with all due respect why are we to take your example of a lone wolf leftist punching a fascist to be indicative of a morally rotten ideological core while the fact that there are thousands of children who are homeless as an immediate result of right wing ideology is brushed aside?

>>116233
/pol/ is barely a 5 year old board and it didn't become the biggest until 2015. The privilege of being the largest board comes at the expense of being also the newfag's board, so they tend to build a narrative of what 4chan "always was" that suits their ethos. /pol/'s past incarnations (specially the first one) went without glory and few missed them, that is not indicative of a highly political user-base but an apolitical, non-partisan and ultimately uninterested one (with the exception of election drama maybe).

While few can cast doubt upon 4chan's current user-base ideological leanings, saying /pol/ is representative of them because it is the largest board is still misleading. Had /v/ remained as one board (instead of being partitioned in 4) it'd be the biggest by quite a margin, but you don't see anyone claiming we are gamer website.

>>116270
That's not proving liberals form a majority on this site. Not being conservative doesn't make them liberal. It's not a binary. Do not make the mistake of assuming because someone isn't slinging rightwing nonsense that they are accepting of yours. Find me a board where leftists can openly do their spiel without meeting massive counter arguments, because /tv/, /v/, /pol/, /b/ and /int/ represent the majority of the site's traffic and they're far from accepting of leftist politics.

Furthermore "weeb," boards are nowhere near unitary. /d/ for instance, despite the subject matter, regularly shuts down people injecting leftwing nonsense into the board, as does its newer sister board /aco/.

>>116284
But we are a website of people who like video games.

Just as we are a website of people who like America.

Liberals, go to reddit.

>>116273
He was right but he hasn't been since december, if that helps.

>>116287
lol, Go ask >>>/qa/. They will set you straight.

>>116288
>We
This is an anime site and your normalfag videogames ruined it.

>>116288
Less than half of 4chan's users are American (47%). I'm not sure all of the American ones like America, and although the non-American ones certainly enjoy your cultural exports, when it comes to the actual country and its people it might be a different story

>>116281
Because that single instance of a lone wolf leftist punching a fascist was none of those things. The left embraced it all over social media. Conservatives shitting on gays are condemned by everyone except the worst of christfags while those punching at anyone they consider fascists are applauded.

And I don't think familial killings of gay members happened at any sort of scale for the word scale to even be relevant. Casting them out is one thing, but nowhere were religious families offing their gay members in any numbers for it to be relevant to this conversation. The Laramie case is accepted as a tragedy and captured the nation when it happened. If the dynamic of families killing their gay members were anything resembling reality it would have undoubtedly overshadowed that case by comparison.

>>116291
>go ask /qa/
Why would I go to an obscure unlisted board regularly subjected to crossposting from places like GamerGhazi to learn anything about 4chan's user base?

>>116291
Tryhard

>>116293
Most people like America dumbass commie

>>116296
/qa/ is the meta board made up of jaded users from all the other boards.

>>116299
Half-ass

>>116294
>. The left embraced it all over social media
Social media is the operative term. You can find gigantic communities dedicated entirely to taking creep shots but that doesn't mean that it is accepted by the mainstream. It may be anecdotal but I live in a leftist area and i have never seen anybody approve of that.

>Conservatives shitting on gays are condemned by everyone except the worst of christfags
Except for half of the population which consistently elects those very same conservatives.

>while those punching at anyone they consider fascists are applauded.
Leftist reaction to that have been immensely exaggerated.

You are also dodging the gay youth question by focusing on one passing statement which I largely retracted as it pertains to the conversation.

>>116304
Jaded users stay on their boards and bitch about them, they don't generally run off to a containment valve full of offsite posters desperately bidding to change 4chan's rules and moderation to their linking.

>>116301
Then why does Trump want to deport them?

>>116305
You aren't looking hard enough or are trying not to see it then. For fuck's sake, talking heads on CNN tried to pretend like the Berkeley nonsense was a rightwing false flag. It's not hard to find scores of leftist publications like Vox, Slate, Salon, etc, justifying political violence if the offender can reason themselves into seeing their victim as a fascist/white supremacist/whatever.

If you look at the thread's very topic, you'll see that conservatives aren't the monolithic entity out to hate the gays that you think they are. The Christfags are becoming more and more irrelevant with every year and the popular conservatives of today have no ill will towards them.

And again, leftwing reaction to that has been obvious. Everyone on the left was laughing when Spence got punched, but when those same people overreached at Berkeley the laughing crowds went silent, with the moderates wringing their hands and the leftwing purists doubling down anyway. It wasn't just nobodies on Twitter celebrating it. People with power, with influence, with far-reaching platforms were approving of it.

And if you want to talk about which side values gay youth we'll talk about that. Let's talk about leftist student unions in the UK deeming gay men no longer oppressed enough to have a spot in their advocacy groups. Let's talk about leftwing publications stripping gay billionaires of their very identity because they have the wrong politics. Let's talk about the left caring more about the feelings of religious extremists and potential backlash to them rather than the lives of 50 gay people killed by one. Let's talk about leftwing hardliners hijacking pride parades to issue one-sided demands or showing up at vigils for victims to call everyone attending racist.

>>116304
It's so obvious you're new shut the fuck up

>>116308
>i don't understand thing DEBATE ME

>>113381
go and suck start a shot gun you fucking pedocuck.

>>116315
>le ebin cuck may-may XD look at me /pol/ I'm doing it

>>116317
Who are you trying to appeal to with this shit

>>116318
He's right, get out. Go back to /pol/.

>>116317
>>116323
>defends Milo Yiannapolous and pedophilia
>gets called a cuck

>"LOL LE EBIN CUCK MEE MEE LE GO BACK 2 /pol/"

>t-they won't notice right...?

>>116333
You must be new here, in this board being /pol/ is worse than being a pedophile. Just look at the difference between >>113381 (articulate, respectful, coherent, albeit a pedo) and >>116315 (childish, easily triggered, vulgar). The former is someone you can have a interesting conversation with despite disagreeing on almost everything, the latter is someone that will antagonize you if you don't agree with him word by word on every issue because he views people as either allies or foes.

>>116340
Classic illustration of the superficiality of leftists.

Who cares about a pedophile? That other guy is a grump! Lol


Hahahahahaha

>>116310
>Berkeley nonsense was a rightwing false flag.
But that's been confirmed to be a fact.

>>116323
Are you samefagging, or is that the other shill from /leftypol/?

Keep it up guys i almost became communist already

>>116344
There's /leftypol/ again

You seem to be lying so blatantly lately. is it supposed to be humorous or just distracting?

>>116345
>/leftypol/
Nobody, not even the leftists, are low enough to frequent 8gag.

>>116346
/pol/tards stick out like a sore thumb on this board because they can't stop accusing everyone of being one of their boogeymen.

>>116348
Agree the liberal and conservative /pol/tards who try to raid /news/ are pretty blatant. True /news/men liberal or conservative are welcome here.

>>116348
You're fake news.

>>116343
On the contrary, it's your analysis the one that is superficial (he doesn't agree with me, therefore he is a leftist, a cuck and so on). You are so caught by your own narrative that you are oblivious to the fact we are discussing Milo who, besides an alleged pedophile, is a face of the alt-right and, and by extension, as /pol/ as you. Since when agreeing with Milo makes one a liberal?

>>116340
The first post is from /pol/, while the second is an example of /leftypol/. Most of us on /pol/ just want a return to an imperial ehtnostate who invade other states, exterminates their populace, and claims their land and wealth as our own.

The left meanwhile, are massive hypocrites who base their philosophy around emotions and abstract myths such as tolerance. Really, they're the hateful ones since they're trying to destroy our nation and people, while we're trying to remold it into something better and worthy of the aryan ideal. As Spencer said, "Their (the left) whole life Is based on hate."

>>116359
I can't even tell what is real and what is satire anymore.

>>116359
>Most of us on /pol/
Go back to >>>/pol/.

Milo probably had one in the stinker a long time before realizing he was a lovely person

>>116360

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOY4Ka-GBus

>>116344
No it wasn't. Yvette Felarca, a middle-school teacher and organizer for the group By Any Means Necessary even gave interviews shortly after it explaining their participation in it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPrRLyFTzSU

This is the same woman who found herself in trouble with physical altercations with other extremists last year. Her group, BAMN, is a de facto anarchist cult. You can find posts on confession pages dating back a few years characterizing it as such.

http://archive.is/q6EY6

>>116369
Tldr

>>113900
Women can do anything they want. Deal with it, shitlord. :)

>>116384
>>116392
This is what we mean by leftwing shitposting. The moment something they say gets trashed by someone posting clear evidence they're wrong this kind of shit starts happening.

>>116395
Are you that retarded? One said: tldr. No evidence of that being leftwing, the other was obvious bait.

>>116395
>Leftwing shitposting

More like you're easily baited.

>>116410
It only happens when leftists start losing arguments.

>>116396
Are you? There's no reason to shitpost TLDR at a very short post unless the person was invested in the argument or upset with how it went.

Obvious bait or not, it's the same kind of nonsense that gets spammed when discussions don't go a certain way.

>>116369
>a middle-school teacher
Super scary.

>de facto anarchist cult
Ban this sick filth.

>>116395
>http://archive.is/q6EY6

>Admin note: Man, this must have taken a solid 20 minutes to write.

I don't blame him not reading that.

To be honest Milo is cunt and I don't blame anyone who wants to protest him.

His freedom to call Muslims rapist paedophiles is worth the same as other peoples freedom to call him a nazi paedophile.

>>116419
>protest
You're free to do that. You're not free to burn shit, destroy property, and physically attack people and Felarca's group has a history of doing exactly that. They didn't show up to protest, they showed up to riot and hurt people.

And we both know his TLDR was the same thing most TLDRs usually are -- a tantrum at being proved wrong.

>>116421
>They didn't show up to protest, they showed up to riot and hurt people.

Maybe you are too young the remember when skinheads would beat up coloureds and queers.

Have antifa killed any of the alt-right yet?

>>116424
Maybe you're too young to remember skinheads aren't synonymous with neo-nazis anymore than punks are synonymous with commies and anarchists. Skinheads are apolitical, it's a lifestyle and sub-culture, not a political movement.

And judging from your spelling, you're not American and wouldn't know much about its past with politically extreme sub-cultures. You're not allowed to riot and attack people just because you see yourself as an infallible hero and your opposition as a dehumanized label. You don't get to act like a fucking brownshirt and then attempt to gaslight everyone into believing you're fighting the real brownshirts. I don't trust any of the retards who call themselves antifa to have the intelligence or foresight to accurately label someone in the first place, let alone trust any sort of restraint to their counter-productive tantrums.

>>116416
The problem is that compared to you, 80-90% of the population is "leftists" by your standards.

>>116348
>>116351
You're the ones who sick out like sore thumb. Every post is exactly the same.

>stop talking about this thing I dont like, its just opinions
>communism is the answer
>shaming tactics designed for normals

This is all you ever do. Stop bitching about getting called out. Its not my fault you people suck ass at posting.

It's hilarious that you think I care what some faggot anons think. And its telling that you think the board in general cares about the same petty shit as you. On a board this slow.

>>116491
Not really, I'm not a /pol/tard and it's not really that outlandish to label someone trying to characterize the Berkeley riots as a rightwing false flag as a leftist.

>>116526
The thing is they refuse to be labelled, even when its not offensive. They want yo spew leftist talking points while feigning Neutrality.

Republicans are conservative.

Democrats pretend to be neutral.