>http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2017/01/massive-antarctic-larsen-c-crack-extends-by-nearly-10km.html
>>102269
Place your bets.
Have the reptilians revealed themselves yet?
With all the recent theories and activities I really do not know what to think about it all. I'm ready for something to happen or to just forget about it.
It seems reasonable to think the stress must be increasing exponentially to fall off and fall down. It is going to fall down, is it not? It's certainly not going to fall up!
>>102563
There's just a little sliver left before it breaks off. And southern summer is far from over
>>102553
I'll give you a quick summary.
The ice shelf at risk of breaking off is comprised of sea ice, therefore it'll have little if any impact at all on rising sea levels. The more notable thing about this event is how large the shelf is, and how quickly it's calving. The continent's sea ice shrinks and grows seasonally, but this specific region (the Larsen ice shelf located on Antarctica's northern peninsula, composed of parts A, B, and C, C being the largest) was relatively stable until recently. Larsen B disentigrated in 2002, a mass of ice the size of Rhode Island that had endured for roughly 10,000 years. When Larsen C goes, it will fundamentally change the shape of the Antarctic peninsula, and leaves the land ice it was essentially protecting from warmer sea waters exposed to further sublimation. If *that* ice enters the sea, shit would start to look a little grim.
Personally, I'm cool with all of Antarctica's ice melting so that the lost of city of Atlantis will finally be revealed