/pybt/ - Post Your Bike Thread

File: 12501972_1243860665630256_1803131182_n.jpg (82KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x640px

m50 not sure what year.
>Miami FL

File: 1.jpg (1MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x2000px

>>948595
itt: post your rigid mountain bike in front of graffiti

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Coming home over the tacony palmyra bridge

File: bicycle.png (1MB, 1063x735px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1063x735px

It still needs to be aligned for me, and definitely a less cancerous saddle. I don't mind single, it's used for short flatland commutes.
I'm getting vinyls printed for it, they'll probably say something dumb like "memes".

File: dennisvomit.jpg (46KB, 534x553px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 534x553px

>>948609

>>948611
Yes, that's the idea.

>>948609
>It still needs to be aligned

What?

>>948613
Saddle position, bar position

>>948611
>not getting that it's being made into a physical shitpost after reading "memes"

wew lad

>>948609

Where the fuck is all the hardware? Where are the valves?

File: image.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Yesterday

>>948645
Other anons have already said it, but I really like your bike too. I've been occasionally reading the Black Mountain blog for years now, always tempted to get one of his frames myself...

What's with the chain tug though?

File: IMG_20160414_192805180.jpg (415KB, 1274x956px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1274x956px

I know I still have a dork disc, I'm just too lazy to take it off until I have to take off the cassette.

>>948659
10/10, though I may be a little distracted by the background and that excellent blue frame.

>>948681
yeah, CA Hwy 1 is an amazing road.

>>948645
love this bike man, just wondering what that pump was, looking for a frame pump for my touring bike

File: IMG_20160418_183328106.jpg (1MB, 2592x1456px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1456px

Shitty homemade marshguards edition.

File: logging.jpg (456KB, 1353x1082px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1353x1082px

Afraid of getting a stick through my spokes edition.

File: 2016-04-23 05.27.51 1_resized.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

Moving these brakes over to another bike that actually needs long reach brakes and picking up a set of campy brakes soon.

>>948609
I hate those 'faced up' stems. I'm triggered tbqh, senpai.

>>948744
Your bike is beautiful.

>>948776
Everything on it is faced up. How many bolt heads do you see?

File: DSC_2474e.jpg (1023KB, 1799x1198px) Image search: [Google]

1023KB, 1799x1198px

>>948593
it isn't

>>948609
>>948619
Jesus christ, the bike isn't leaning against anything either.

File: 20160424_162535.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

2 dollar frame garage sale find. Made it a bar bike

File: Attach15477_20160405_160218.jpg (3MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x1836px

>>949121
Here's how I got it

>>948593

Do yourself a favor. Those metal brackets that are holding up your fender at the back, the ones that are sticking out at the top? Cover those with something. They will cut you good. They need to be cut on your front wheel.

Whoever put those fenders on is an idiot.

>>949121
>>949125

Nice find!

File: nature.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

Nature shot.

>>948652
They're really nice frames! I could not be happier with this bike. It's hard to beat the bang-for-the-buck if you want a modern, simple frame.

The chain tug is because I had a bad experience with forward-facing dropouts once and am forever paranoid. I am an engineer, I solve problems, and this is now a solved problem. We have the technology.

>>948711
It's a Topeak pump.

>>948744
loving the levers

>>949125
very nice, turned out great!

File: 20160425_132145.jpg (1MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1920px

Moutachio life

>>949104
This bike is triggering

File: IMG_20160426_234718513_HDR.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

New project, Lemond Buenos Aires 2000, Reynolds 853 tubing.

Got the frame for 70 USD, was it a good deal?

>>949296

Nah. Especially not without the fork.
You're going to throw $500 of components at it and end up with a $200 bike.

File: image.jpg (3MB, 3030x1958px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3030x1958px

>tfw 90° and 60% humidity today

>>949316

Foot retention.
Get some.
Even if it's just half-clips.

>>949316
pls b in london

File: 1456761753220.gif (3MB, 222x379px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 222x379px

>>948609
This picture is really starting to Fuck with my head.

>>949297
I'm not planning to throw so much money at it, just hunt down some year appropiate components. I've seen some really cheap full shimano 600. But you are right about the fork, a carbon 1 inch fork is going to be a pain to find, meanwhile i'm gonna throw a Cr-Mo one i have.

>>949331

Trust me. By the time you add up fork, headset, stem, bars, levers, brakes, seatpost, saddle, bottom bracket, crankset, front mech, rear mech, chain, cables & housing, wheels, tubes, tires, etc you'll be looking at at least $500 in random stuff.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. Projects are fun. Just don't expect to turn a profit or break even when you sell it.

>>949318
I've used about every type of foot retention you can get and I haven't found one I like using in traffic while commuting. Flats are fine for around town.

File: IMG_20160421_190327_1461784258970.jpg (256KB, 1037x778px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1037x778px

>>948596
There's no graffiti where I live. I am loving the bike though. Its 25 year old cup and cone bb is still going strong

File: 20160427_133830_HDR.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

r8, h8, appreci8

>>949413

>overbuilt gravelgrinder frame with huge tire clearance and clutched derailleur on narrow semi-slicks riding on pedestrian walkways

Shameforu despray

>>949425
My m8 wanted to ride asphalt today. I usually have knobbies on them

>>948645
I hate neon/80s colors, but if you got banana yellow sidewalls like that other guy said and a saddle in either yellow or that bartape blue color, even I would have to admit it would be super sweet looking.

but anyway, cool bike.

File: GatorPano.jpg (4MB, 8741x1000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 8741x1000px

How 'bout some pano-ramic bike pictures?

>>949125
AFAIK Ross were all hi-ten dept store bikes, but I always thought their graphics were nice, clean and classy.

this is a rare instance where you've improved a bike by doing a SS conversion.

$2 well spent.

>>949435

yahuh.

>>949316
the way whatever sized wheels those are (29?) make that small-ish frame look reeeeeally small is a really cool look. colors and silver all themed nicely. I hate the 90s look of the Surly logo but what can you do amirite?

>>949316
Might want a kickst- ayyy lmaooo

File: 20160427_163620.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>949445
Op here. I totally agree. The frame is gas pipe cap but just like you I love the decals. They are clean and nothing crazy. Posted is the other frame I tried building. Turns out the dent wad bigger issue than I thought. Doesn't track straight. All well it was cheap frame. Learned a lot about bikes building that up

File: IMG_2418.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Someone was asking in the last thread about my new wheels and crank.

Here they is.

>>949480
i love old trek frames, the decal and typeface they used - fucking classy.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

We really out here

>>949503
What does the text on the rims say? Every time I see those I think of n+1.

>>949504
Reminds me of Bioshock. Any idea how old that font is? I'm guessing that frame isn't actually from the 60s.

>>949511

H Plus Son

>>949512
not him but it really ought to say N Plus One, though.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

Got the new Hank out on the trails today. I love klunkin!

>>949121
>>949480
>>949528
>being this much of a faggot hipster downtube
anons pls
>>949508
9/10 would ride. Remove the fenders and it'll go up to 10/10
>>949413
9/10 would ride

>>949524
Not a bad idea for a custom decal

File: 059830.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

Gave my bike a makeover, really enjoyed working on it.

>>949181
I LOVE it!

>>949573
>dat untensioned chain

File: tmp_14798-Resized_20160427_125627~2-120575336.jpg (836KB, 2096x1179px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 2096x1179px

Thanks for the advice /n/ i love this bike

>>949660
You know what to do with that stem, son. Otherwise, nice bike.

File: image.jpg (202KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 640x640px

>>948596
Hell yeah

>>949215
COMFY
O
M
F
Y

>>949511
>>>949503
>What does the text on the rims say? Every time I see those I think of n+1.
>>>949504
>Reminds me of Bioshock. Any idea how old that font is? I'm guessing that frame isn't actually from the 60s.


Trek 311 frame. Ishwata tubing. I'm guessing 80's

File: tmp_14798-Resized_20160428_084829-254576825.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

>>949676
First bike with drop bars I've ever owned. Gonna get used to it before I slam it. Coming from this flat bar hybrid.

File: _SAM2294.jpg (1MB, 2500x1666px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x1666px

>>948593
raleigh's new bikes have been pretty amazing and beats everything for the same price
i really want a mustang comp as it's got some fantastic parts for the price, but i haven't got £1500 for a new bike


replaced my £2 pink grips for some knock ergons.

File: IMG_20160424_115512273.jpg (1MB, 1170x1725px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1170x1725px

same old bike

File: 20160425_141210 (Large).jpg (755KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 1920x1080px

picked up a Specialized Diverge last week. havent hade that much time on it yet, but i like it a lot so far.

>>948645
custom frame?

>>949296
that would be total bargain where i live.

>>949316
niiiiice

File: 234234234231.jpg (625KB, 2048x1154px) Image search: [Google]

625KB, 2048x1154px

2009 Diamondback for XC. nothing special but I love the thing.

>>949769
Nice bike and nice pic, saved.
>>949749
>dat saddle
Hipster shit

File: 2.jpg (3MB, 4000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x3000px

>>949676
>tfw I slammed my stem on my OTS
D-did I do good /n/?

>>949792
but that shit was £17 down from £50. i'd happily be a hipster if i don't have to spend a lot.

File: disappoint.jpg (66KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 480x270px

>>949794
>OTS

File: out.jpg (25KB, 425x320px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 425x320px

>>949802
>not liking OTSs
Downtube detected.

>>949121
I like what you've done with it, very nice.

>>949530
>>949805
>downtube
I-is this a new meme? I was only away for a few days.

>>949846
No, it's one person trying to force it

File: IMG_20160427_195236.jpg (1MB, 3167x2372px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3167x2372px

>>949755
Whereabouts is this?

That's a nice, sensible bikes I'd be happy to knock out some miles on.

>>948645
what kind of bars would those happen to be? they look pretty comfy

>>949846
Yes
>>949847
No, I am one of multiple people using it, you fucking downtube

>>949846
It's literally a samefag. It's extremely forced. He basically goes into multiple threads at one time, just to find posts he can meme at while offering nothing else, and you will notice there will be waves of a dozen meme posts at one time.

It's not casually used in discussion as an accepted meme is.

File: but thats wrong.jpg (23KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x400px

>>949900
>mfw I call people downtubes and other people use the term as well

>>949760
The diverge is such a nice bike. I almost bought one but got the surly frame instead because I already had all the parts that fit it. Sweet bike man!

>>949794
not with that saddle angle, no, you didn't.

shit walmart bikes incoming, but i love the roadie

File: fuckingphones.jpg (1MB, 4032x2268px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x2268px

>>949913
fucking phone cant into pictures

>>949914

Throw them in the garbage and buy a good bike.

Don't even sell them. Destroy them.

>>948645
i-is that biplane-crowned fork stock? *_*

>>949185
I think the proper engineering solution is vertical dropouts.

>>949926
Not him, but those bike may be atrociously low quality, but they can stand up to some punishment. And if you're just starting out they're not a terrible idea

File: Message_1457741727642-1.jpg (2MB, 2816x1776px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2816x1776px

I got this Mikado lance for 35$. what do you guys think?

>>949956
Obviously low end but it's not walmart tier, so good job getting it for $35.

>>949954

This is exactly the opposite of true.

In particular the so-called bottom brackets are notoriously unreliable and quick to fail.

I believe they are also not replaceable with standard components, and manufacturer replacements are not available either afaik.

>>949956

Unless you are 6' 3" or taller it is probably too big for you.

Fair price for the bike, but it needs some thorough TLC to be rideable.

>>949959
I commuted on a shitty walmart hybrid for 3 years and the most I ever had to do was true the wheels. I gave it to my grandpa eventually and he still rides in almost daily with no issues.

>>949962

Commuted what distance, and how long did it take?

>>949954

Garbage tier bikes are never a good starting point. One ride on even a good used bike makes this clear to anyone.

>>949963
I rode a total of 19 miles each day. Took quite a while though because I only had 7 gears.

>>949966

That's kinda pushing the edge of credibility.

>>949956
9/10 would ride. Make sure to inspect the tires thoroughly before doing any long rides, old bikes sometimes have worn out tires liable to blowout at any time.

>>949911
Riding in the drops (or the tops) with that saddle angle is very comfortable for me, faggot.

File: k2-_38665611-c178-44f6-9ae0-8c017ac5eef3.v1.jpg-f68bba57db0bf71db3c0cef9e53737930b635cdf-optim-450x450.jpg (26KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 450x450px

>>949976
Pic related is the bike

Whatever though man

>>949854
thanks, it's a very comfy and lightish (considering it's Cr-Mo) bike, just rode 230 km of not-so-nice roads and performed solidly. BTW it's in México.

>>949956
are you ever going to tell me what kind of steel it says on that seat tube sticker?

File: 20160425_134930-1.jpg (2MB, 2847x1756px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2847x1756px

>>949979
I've already taken the tires off. a bike shop my friend works at has some 27" vittoria zaffiros I'm getting soon. I'm also going to get new brake and shift cables, a new chain, some new bar tape (suggestions appreciated), and a new saddle/seatpost.

>>950197
Its in my shed right now,
I'll get back to you as soon as it's not cold as shit outside.

>>949981

If there is any truth to your story whatsoever, I admire your dedication.

File: IMAG0256.jpg (3MB, 4224x2368px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4224x2368px

Muh commuter

I 've got a slick new pair of 26x1.0s waiting for me at my bike shop and then after that I need to snag a rigid fork

>>950300
>I 've got a slick new pair of 26x1.0s waiting for me at my bike shop and then after that I need to snag a rigid fork
It's clearly past time for you to get a road bike, or at least a road frame to build up as a commuter. That saddle to bar height difference is impressive though.

>>950303
I'm actually in the process of building a road bike, so I've got that covered. This one is fun though, it's essentially my "test" bike for trying out fits and parts and stuff

>>950300

Why the shit do you have it fit like a pursuit frame? It's a fucking COMMUTER. You're supposed to have an upright position so you can keep a close eye on what other retarded people are doing.

>>950300

This was supposed to be posted to the troll bike thread.

>>950314
It's more comfortable this way, and its more fun. I haven't had any issues with situational awareness except in extremely rare cases. "It just works"

>>950315
Every time, bb :^)

>>950300
why the hell are you going to buy all that shit to upgrade a frame that clearly does not fit you

>>950322
I think some of it is the angle of the picture, before I de-stickered it it said it was a 23 inch frame. I think it's plenty big enough

File: bike size chart mtn.png (33KB, 638x211px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 638x211px

>>950325
if you can ride it with the seat post extended that high, that indicates that it's too small. but you do you, buddy. you've clearly made up your mind.

>>950325

None of it is the angle of the picture.

Your saddle height is ballsnose ridiculous and if that is even remotely comfortable you either have the shortest torso in recorded history or the frame is entirely the wrong size for you.

>>950328
According to that chart it's the right size for me though, huh, weird. I know it looks too small but it works for me. I've adapted to it anyways. I prefer smaller frames anyways since I ride pretty aggressively either way

>>950332
that's not a 23"

look at the bikes here that have the old-style horizontal top tubes like yours. https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=23%20inch%20MTB%20mountain%20bike&tbs=imgo:1#imgrc=_
now look at the head tubes on those bikes. now look at yours.

either it was mislabeled, or you're remembering it wrong, but that bike is not a 23".

>>950333
Yo the headtube on my bike is massive though. Giant liked to build those thick ass aluminum tubes round this time so that downtube is at least 1.5 to 2 inches in diameter

>>950341
whatever dude.

see:
>>950329

>>950345
Could it not be that the saddle height seems so extreme because the handlebars are set so low? And that it wouldn't seem so major if the bars were raised up to where you would normally see MTB bars?

>>949760
The Diverge looks great, but how much did you pay for it if you don't mind me asking? $1499 seems pretty steep for an aluminum bike only equipped with Tiagra.

File: derpdurp.jpg (157KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 960x720px

Wanted to take some nice photos of my bike, but I'll do it once I removed all decals. This is of today, mine is on the right.

I know, it's a cheap bike, but it's really fun to blast around with it. Only thing I'd really change are the wheels, but those will stay until I destroy them... so I guess they push me to ride harder as I don't care if I bend them.

>>950366
>laying down directly on the derailleur
you dont deserve a bike.

File: IMAG0654.jpg (963KB, 2592x1728px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 2592x1728px

>>950366
>>950383
There's also a fucking kerb right there, do you not know how to stand up a bike...

>>950383
>>950386
It's on the pedal, the kerb is there so it doesn't touch the derailer, and I laid it down softly you aspies.

>>949760
Black Mountain Cycles's cross frame. He does a run of them out of Taiwan about once a year. This is from the latest batch; pink is basically all sold out but he has some British Racing Green ones left. Goddamn nice frame for under $600.

>>949869
Satori Boondocks is the OEM. Easiest to get in the USA through Velo Orange as the "Dajia Far". Origin 8 just started selling it as the "Gary Ergo Sweep".

It's pretty damn good offroad. High sweep and flair, low reach and drop. Lots of leverage in the drops, super stable on descents in the hooks, and the hooks are open enough that they don't pinch/pressure the way some dirt drops do. Hoods are a usable position, even though they're at a pretty extreme sideways angle.

Dislikes:
* The clamp is just barely wide enough for the stem clamp, and the tops are narrow, so if you want to tape the tops to use them as a grip area, there's basically no where to clamp a light or other accessory to the bar.
* The drops are still angled down a little more than I'd like. If I angled the bar more to flatten them out, I think the hoods would become unusable. I keep hoping the Luxy makes a comeback.

>>949933
Hell yes!

>>949935
Agreed, but that doesn't give you the versatility of maybe choosing single-speed without some sort of other chain tensioner.

I'd build it with vertical dropouts if I was spec'ing a custom frame, but this frame is built as a versatile platform that's able to be built in many different ways... and forward facing dropouts are really flexible.

>>950396
Sliding vertical dropouts

File: 041016115759940.jpg (519KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 1600x900px

I've been seeing a lot more mountain bikes on here lately which is cool. I think I'm going to start phasing out some of the red accents and I plan to send her in for some NDT and a paint job this upcoming winter. I'm thinking having the rear triangle painted a different color but I don't know what yet.

>>950397
Also really nice. Before I bought the BMC frame, I was really tempted by the Soma Wolverine.

File: bridgestone-comp-1989-mb2.jpg (84KB, 756x511px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 756x511px

>>948593
Bridgestone - God tier MTB reporting in
i be riding this beauty for 26 years. awesome fuckin' bike. took it to my local bike shop and all the wrenches (who btw are all younger than this bike) went apeshit.

>>950407
Yet you couldn't take a freaking picture of it?

>>948609
Amazon fixie, it's not half bad, but that looks like suit

>>949528
that bike is fucking nice. Very close to the first OG mountain bikes

>>950506
All it needs is some chrome motomags

File: Toured up.jpg (2MB, 2000x2709px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2709px

New Bike I got for touring. Going to ride the Pacific Coast bike trail, all the way up to Vancouver Canada.

First time I've ever used clipless pedals. They are nice.

>>950508
Never thought about that. Green anodized would be sweet

>>950300

Here's what I think:

FUCK YEAH
(except the brake lever situation but otherwise FUCK YEAH)

>>950524

great choice

I'm going full framebagfag on my touring bike after doing 11 hours into a headwind last wednesday

>>949914
Did you get that roadtech "bike" for free too?

File: zP1013238.jpg (2MB, 3648x2736px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3648x2736px

'98

>>950360
Sorry but it's a Specialized aluminum bike equipped with Tiagra, so the price sounds pretty adequate.

>>948868
What? Why?
>>948867
Nice credit card stickers lel.

File: me ride-sakura.jpg (821KB, 1537x2405px) Image search: [Google]

821KB, 1537x2405px

Fresh pic from a brief trip to Japan.
Those two freds? I overtook them later without even trying.
Cheers.

>>950551
>alphabet sign
>non square shaped cars
>not filled with toyota
>white people
>graffiti
That ain't japan.

>>950557
this

why the fuck are you lying about the location you retard
it looks like continental europe, germany or east of germany

>>950300
Pls show pic with someone on the bike. I want to see the rider positioned. You know, just for keks.

File: me ride-loway.jpg (781KB, 2415x1199px) Image search: [Google]

781KB, 2415x1199px

>>950557
>>950573
Wasn't being serious. Sorry!
Have another pic.
[spoiler]Loway, because it's underneath. Get it?[/spoiler]

>>950551
The number sign on the wall is in japanese and the cars are all japanese

>>950475
That's the point. Same geometry as the 1938 Schwinn Excelsior.

>>950578
I really don't know how I'd do that, a timer maybe?

>>950537
What's your issue with the brake lever? Just curious. I like hearing people's thoughts about my bike set-up

>>950614
It doesn't look like that lever is very easy to pull. A bar end lever would maybe be better but with such short bar ends it's going to be difficult getting proper leverage.

File: drop_bars_Gold_2048x2048.jpg (137KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 2048x1365px

>>950614
>What's your issue with the brake lever? Just curious. I like hearing people's thoughts about my bike set-up

It's dangerous. Those levers are meant to be pulled in the opposite direction, not with you pinky and ring finger

I'm not happy with your handlebar tape either, for the record. Loose tape can slip, then you fall under a car

Your cheapest solution would be 22.2 diameter bullhorn bars.

22.2 is the clamp diameter for mtb brake levers. Most bullhorn bars are meant for road brake levers, which have a clamp diameter of 23.8mm, so you have to hunt for MTB size ones

Here is the first result in google. $26

https://www.purefixcycles.com/products/bull-horn-bars?variant=352153369


Alternatively, you could go for a completely different stem + bar combination. But this would be the #1 priority if I was upgrading you bike

I do like your bike though. You must be young / in shape / little crazy

>>950614

(cont.)

looking at it again you probably do use the right fingers, but having the levers like that will make your grip on the bars too weak.

A proper bullhorn bar with the levers mounted the correct direction would give you a safer handle on your bike

>>950549
What makes specialized aluminum more expensive than a similarly priced cannondale, felt, etc... with 105? Is it just the name? I'm genuinely curious, not trying to put the bike down.

>>950549

You want some credit card stickers?

You can get them for free here:

https://www209.americanexpress.com/merchant/services/en_US/pages/logosandsupplies/allproducts#search=product_decals

> For your "business"

>>950549

>What? Why?

lol. It's temporary but it was the easiest way to keep the chain from jumping 1x. Didn't need to buy anything new to do it. I could have used and old FD but... I had the parts to do this silly sandwich so I did

Triple FD is coming in the mail now, so I can go normie 3x9 touring mode

>>950624
I've played with the idea of getting bullhorns but I have yet to find anything that is similar to the size on mine already. Since I flipped an mtb riser stem and trimmed it down, my bars are only about 12 inches wide. And as far as the bar tape goes, it's just some used bar tape I had from another bike and I wanted to see if I /could/ wrap these, since there's so little real estate up front

>>950618
Yeah I've hunted around a little bit but I haven't found anything that seems like it would work better than how I have it. Maybe interrupter levers but I'm not entirely sure those woulld be much different. I haven't had any real issues with the brake capabilities

File: IMG_20160430_085336312.jpg (235KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 640x480px

>>950412
here ya go...not a great pic but this is it

>>950652
Lovely, looks very well taken care of.

File: 002.jpg (364KB, 1656x1242px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1656x1242px

Bought in 92

>>950659
classic! sweet bike

File: specka-slika-66023935.jpg (204KB, 920x613px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 920x613px

>>948593
ta-dam!

200$ new purchase, havent even rode it

>>950388
My point was to stand it up using the kerb...
I even posted a pic ffs

>>950724

The frame looks pretty rough, m8.

Personally I would remove the derailleurs, crankset, BB, seatpost, brake calipers. Maaaaaybe the stem and cassette. Replace them all with partsbin OTS junk, flip the bike, and find something a bit nicer to build with the components worth keeping.

>>950774
>slim lugs
>DT and FD bosses
>chromed stays
>integrated DR hanger

Looks like a pretty nice frame to me.

>>950780

Someone took the time to mask the stays, but it appears to have been rattlecanned and a replaced front fork is always cause for concern.

>>950786
Yeah I was actually about to say the front end looks slightly bent but not enough to matter I'm sure

File: IMG_20160426_182646020.jpg (2MB, 2592x1456px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1456px

>>950753
Go Team Rockhopper!

>>950958

Not bad at all.
Balanced aesthetics.
Common sense component choices.

Would ride.

>>950958
kick his ass, si bass!

File: roleto-slika-66344232.jpg (141KB, 920x613px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 920x613px

>>950774
>>950780
>>950786
>>950789
>the front end looks slightly bent

is is slightly bent,its almost a standard on all steel frames, but its nothing dramatic. frame is pic rel model, Roleto with Columbus tubes so no paint on the stays

>>950987
>is is slightly bent,its almost a standard on all steel frames

Stop trying to justify buying a bent piece of shit

File: specka-slika-66023942.jpg (94KB, 460x690px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 460x690px

>>950988
>Stop trying to justify buying a bent piece of shit

>implying I havent bought it bent deliberatly in order to shorten the wheelbase and a bit of trail to have a more modern geometry

>>950987
No paint on the rear stays has nothing to do with the frame being Reynolds or Columbus tubing. It has everything to do with the builder and what they offered. For the very most part, polished stays and a polished front fork were options at an additional expense and tended to only be offered for higher end bikes.

Your bike is pretty sweet though. A bit on the small side, but I would ride it. I appreciate your attention to detail.

File: 011a30284152932d34bfd0e743d6c510.jpg (57KB, 736x489px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 736x489px

>>950997
thanks m8, Im 5"10 so its only slighly big for me (its 56cm, this is my bike >>950724, but Im kind of new to road bikes so the feel is kind of weird for now, 54 would be perfect).

the only thing I want to adjust now is the hood palcement - I want to put them lower on the bar and raise the bar angle a bit in order to keep it leveled with the TT like on modern road bikes like pic rel so Ill be slightly higher on the hoods and angled on the drops...is it a good idea?

>>950998
Without swapping parts, you should rotate the bars up or move the hoods toi much. A little rotation is fine, but you won't have your "classic/traditional bend" handlebars and brake levers looking like a "compact drop" handlebar. The difference is classic bars have the tops as the highest point, then bend and drop a bit to the hoods, and then finish the bend further down into a flat section in the drops (the flat section of the drops is usually close to level, if not perfectly level). The hoods on these bars form a "ramp" shape on traditional bars, like a ski slope that starts at the tops.
Modern, compact handlebars are designed to have the tops and the hoods at the same height, with the tops and the "ramp" of the hoods forming a straight line. There is a sharp bend right under the hood clamp that mellows out into a gentle curve for the length of the drops area that doesn't straigten out like traditional bars would.
Older style brake hoods usually feel best when used on tradional shape bars, and modern integrated brake/shifters are shaped to be used on compact handlebars. However, there are some modern brake-only levers that are designed for comoact handlebars, and there are still modern "traditional" bend bars (see Peter Sagan's handlebars)

>>951007
>Without swapping parts, you should NOT rotate the bars up or move the hoods too much
Also, please excuse the rest of my tyoos. I am using an IME on my phone that doesn't have an auto-correct dictionary

File: 05-IMG_1545.jpg (356KB, 1300x782px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1300x782px

>>951007
>>951009

thanks! I havent noticed the drop Sagan has on the hoods, quite interesting but its still slightly higher than the position of the hoods on a pure traditional bar.

so rotating slightly the bar upwards and droping the hoods few centimiters from this >>950724 (but nothing extreme) will be possible to get the, slightly more comfortable on the hoods sagan position or is the ba change needed for that? I come from mtb so this kind of reach is quite uncomfortable for now.

>>951007
You can move the hoods higher as long as you can still reach the levers with 1 finger from your drop position. You can angle the bars up as long as your drop position remains comfortable. Generally pointing the bar ends at the rear brake is as far as you'd go. Your post is a little confusing. Do you want a more or less aggressive position? The saddle to bar drop is already quite minimal. If you move the hoods down the bar you will not be able to easily grip the very bottom of the lever from the drops, with your index or index and ring finger which provides best leverage for braking. If you want flat ramps - high hoods- get some nitto noodles, they are very very comfortable, strong and worth it.

>>951012
oh shit there's another post. You're not making sense. Is the position too aggresive? You want to rotate the bars upward (make less drop) and move the hoods down (more drop) for a sum total 0 effect?

>>951015
>nitto noodles

sorry for the confusion, I want a less agressive position without dropping the stem, something like that noodle bar

>>951012
I may have been a bit confusing. To shorten the reach, it will actually be rotating the bars down some and moving the hoods up a little. The hoods move a little closer to you, but get a little lower.
What I said before will bring the hoods slightly higher from the ground, but not really make the reach short.
In the end, the only REAL limitations are how effectively you can still squeeze the brakes when you rotate them, so I recommend you carefully unwrap the bars (so you can reuse the tape) and make any adjustments and ride it a little bit to test the position out before you finalize it by rewrapping the bars. As you turn the bar up or down, the brake levers also start to point up or down, which force your wrists to an awkward angle when braking from the hoods, or may even make it difficult to reach the levers from the drops. That is why you can shift the hoods a bit opposite to how you rotate the bars to mitigate these symptoms.

The changes to the reach and hood height using older style bars and hoods is quite limited compared to the same method on new bars. Most of the reach on old handlebars is in the length of the handlebar itself, and the hoods are very short, so there is no way to really shrink the handlebar reach unless you actually point them down and move the hoods closer to the tops.
Modern compact handlebars--and even Sagan's modern "traditional" bend bars--have relatively short reach compared to your true classic bars even though they are similarly shaped. That is because modern hoods are longer and flatter, so the tops and reach of modern bars got shorter. These modern proportions (along with the angle modern hoods clamp to the bar at) make shortening the reach easier.

In the end (again), there are simply limitations to how much you can adjust reach or drop on any setup without swapping to different size components

File: yes1416177522304.png (183KB, 424x318px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 424x318px

>>951018
thanks for the advice man, Ill try it out!

File: sex.jpg (358KB, 1647x924px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1647x924px

Pic is a year old but the only thing that has changed is the rear tire and rear derailleur.

Got a WTB Wolverine in the rear now, the Rock Razor that came with the bike wasn't suitable for the wet and mossy forests I ride in. Snapped the derailleur cage off the original X0 and changed to GX 10 speed.. It's fucking incredible that you can't get replacement cages for a part that is worth like 200 €.

>>951049
Me likey. How much front/rear travel?

>>951049
>It's fucking incredible that you can't get replacement cages for a part that is worth like 200 €.

The sad reality is that it probably costs them like 50€ and since they can rip people off whenever they want, they just go the easy route and sell only complete parts.

So keep broken mechs as you will eventually find yourself with a perfectly good spare part that will save you from spending 200€ again.

File: IMG_0327.jpg (764KB, 1907x1272px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1907x1272px

grocery getter

>>951070
>>951049
>It's fucking incredible that you can't get replacement cages for a part that is worth like 200 €.

that is why you ALWAYS stick to qualtiy mid tier parts. when smth brakes of the mid tier, buy used, buy cheap, fogetaboutit

File: gravel grinding is not a meme.jpg (597KB, 1972x1054px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1972x1054px

My new baiku.

>>951074
That's very nice, except for that golden hub. For what purpose?

>>951076

Actually is orange. I wanted something other than black or silver, and thought that red would be too much of color coordination and none of the other options seemed any good, so orange it is.

>>951074
You should save up for some hydraulic disk brakes so you don't warp your rotors

>>951078
It just looks off.

>>951082

Yeah, it's not the best combo. The rear hub matches though. Might change the bar tape to black or something so it doesn't look so weird.

>>949914
Those will break eventually from casual use. Please be careful.

File: DSC_3564small.jpg (2MB, 1920x1161px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1161px

Couple changes since last post. New tyres fitted today (went from 25mm to 28mm), flipped stem, replaced front rotor as the shitty unbranded one was noisy as fuck, and finally got a computer (Giant Axact AW9).

Whilst changing my tyres I decided to weigh my wheels as I was looking at getting a lighter set and these ones are supposedly heavy, turns out I wouldn't even be saving 100g for £150. Either these aren't stock (rims don't match and rear has silver nipples) or the reviewer was expecting way too much from a cheaper bike.

>>951081
How the fuck would mechs warp the rotors?

If he didn't overpay for that ti frame he'd have plenty of money for hydros.

>>951119

Basically because I think in BB7 only one pad moves and bends the rotor slightly to touch the other pad. I have not heard any reports that this would be a problem.

I considered hydraulics but in the end decided against them because I know how to service cable actuated brakes, but not hydraulically actuated. Also now I can transfer the brifters to a standard road bike if I ever want to.

>>951125
Single piston calipers aren't a problem if that's what he was getting at, they're not as good as dual piston ones for a few reasons but they aren't going to do any damage.

File: IMG_0136.jpg (711KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 1000x1500px

>>951125
all pistons will eventually slightly bend the rotor but it's not a huge deal, there should be enough clearance to allow for that. Worst that might be is that if you're one for completely silent bikes, that might create some slight "shhh... shhh" brake noise. At least that's my case with very cheap mechanical disc brakes, the only issue I have is that from time to time I need to adjust the brakes, but that shouldn't be such an issue with BB7's. They're actually in my mind as an eventual brakes upgrade...

But even then, pic related is my bike right now (couldn't clean it after last ride as it started raining) and it's still silent enough that when I was coming back from the ride people wouldn't hear me coming up.

>yes, it's quite disgusting
>no, it's not rust, just reddish dust
>yes I will clean it ASAP, just gotta wait for a sunny day, not going to ride it like this

>>951127
>They're actually in my mind as an eventual brakes upgrade...
Unless you're running drop bars or some other unusual setup just get hydros, for flat bars the price difference is tiny for low end hydros (which will be better than even BB7s).

>>951128
I'd get them for the extra adjustability over my current tektros, I don't feel the need to 1-finger brake (my current brakes stop the bike easily with two fingers.) and I like the adjustability on the field, I don't want to have to mess with hydraulics (I know it's not a huge deal, but I don't want to go to a bike shop if I can help it, and mechanical disk brakes are really easy to work on - I don't see the benefit of hydraulics except for better brake modulation.)

>>951130
Trust me, the better modulation with hydros is absolutely worth it. It's not about having more power but being able to get the same braking force with less effort, with just one finger (which means an extra finger round the grips giving more control) you can vary the force precisely without tiring your hands out.

Also whilst they're a bit more work for the initial setup (if they don't come already filled and bled) they don't require as much maintenance and adjustments as cable brakes, they automatically adjust as the pad wears and when you put new pads in and alignment doesn't need to be quite as precise.

I've got BB5s at the moment (the white bike a few posts back) and they okay, but if I keep my flat bars I'm going to swap them out for some hydros like on all my mountain bikes.

>>949660

Is it just me or does the front disc look smaller than the rear?

>>949573

>loose chain
>cables not crossing
>rust showing on the stem
>black seatpost
>ugly pedals

Fix those things and that would be a 5/5 cruiser.

>>951133
Idk, I got a SRAM X5 shifter and that is really comfortable, I'm only using my thumb, so using two fingers to brake doesn't really put me at a discomfort in any way. I never accused any hand/wrist fatigue. I'll try out hydros on the trail at the first chance I get, but so far I'm not really seeing the benefits for a non-racer.

They'll be an upgrade really far down the line anyways, probably when the wheels or rotors are shot... I've been riding often only for like 3 months, improving steadily and right now what I really need is a set of good flat pedals.

>>951137
It's not just you. I would say the front is 140mm and the rear 160mm. I'm not sure how mounting works with 140mm discs (as post mount and IS are 160mm natively), my best guess would be it uses shorter posts hence the rear being stuck with 160.

>>951139
It might depend on the size of your hands, if you've got longer fingers your ring and pinky might have a bit more grip round the bar. Also I've got a fucked up pinky finger on my right hand (broke it in a crash) which doesn't help my grip strength when it's just two fingers holding on.

File: WP_20160501_15_49_54_Pro.jpg (2MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1840px

Just installed some ergons- i fucking love bar ends- such comfy.

>>951071
fuck you

>>951108

looks great to me. I'm about to do something like this with a jamis allegro 2.0 w/carbon fork

Fat tires are a must on flat bar roadish hybrids. I'm going 32mm

You might enjoy Ergon style grips if you get any wrist pain, also what I'm doing

>>951150

matching white appresh

File: WP_20160223_19_18_03_Pro.jpg (2MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1840px

>>951179
my white ESIs turned grey in 1 ride.

>>951175
If I don't get drop bars (looking less likely the more I ride this bike) I might get some bar ends and a slightly shorter stem, never been a fan of ergo grips.

I was after some 32s but the store only had 35s. These were cheap enough that I don't mind switching if I don't like them. I've only taken them on a 5 minute ride but they seem a fair bit comfier than the 25s.

File: inventoroftheclock.jpg (12KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 360x360px

>>951181
>wide bars

>>951145
My hands are a bit weird yeah, long and thin fingers, so they all sit tight on the bar and I can easily reach the levers without discomfort. Might be that, too. But as I've never tried hydros, it might also be that I am retarded and I've never experienced that sort of braking efficiency - all I can say is that so far my 160mm front and rear tektros have stopped me really well bot on and offroad, with no discomfort or times where I felt "I was close to crashing because of the brakes".
Also I weight just barely 60kg so there's very little mass to stop, that might help too.

I will post pics of my bloody self if I do end up on the rocks, though!

>>951186
680- new bars are at least 800- some are 880 and mostly risers. Get your shit right if you wanna insult me for being trendy you bitch ass downtube.

>>951128
I'm gonna thoroughly disagree. BB7s are way better than low-end hydro shit. I'm looking at entry level tektros and avids. Low-end shimanos perform decently, but unless you intend to go for some mid-tier or high-tier hydros, the BB7s are a perfectly fine option.

File: 20160425_132924-1.jpg (2MB, 2903x1723px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2903x1723px

>>951186
I ride xc with downhill bars, it's pretty comfy.

>>951224
I can only speak from my experience with Shimano. The lowest end ones I run are the M445/6 and they're better in every way than my BB5s and can be had for less money than BB7s. More power, better modulation, more and better pad choices, and easier to set up.

My BB5s don't even have a consistent feel, the rear feels like turd due to the longer cable and an awkward bend just before the caliper, an issue you don't get with hydros. This is after fucking around for ages getting them set up the best I can, and then as the pads wear I'll have to keep adjusting them and then start all over again when I replace the pads.

>the BB7s are a perfectly fine option.
I'd say adequate, in the sense that they can stop the bike if needed. If they come stock on a bike or hydros aren't an option (using drop bars for example and have a low budget) then fine, but as an upgrade choice they're pretty dumb.

>>951127
>>951130
If you want discs and you don't want to deal with hydraulic, go with the TRP Spyre/Spyke brakes. They're dual piston, less finicky to set up and easier to adjust, and not much more expensive than the BB7s. They use Shimano pads, so you'll always be able to find parts.

To everyone trying to sell hydro discs: Yes, hydro discs are great (I have them on half my bikes), but mechanical discs are still SO MUCH BETTER than the brakes of 10 years ago; they're way more than adequate.

>>951137
>>951140
That setup is backward as fuck. If you're going to mismatch disc sizes, put the smaller one in the rear... weight transfer under braking means you can put a lot more braking force into the front wheel without locking, it's the same reason cars have larger brakes up front...

>>951322
I get that, ideally they'd both be 140mm but the frame can't go any smaller. Of course it could also be setup with 160mm in the front but if 140mm is enough then going larger is just more weight for the sake of aesthetics.

>>951321
Woah those look really cool, but where would I find them in Europe easily? They seem like an American market thing.

>>951323
>more weight
dude it's going to be what, 20 grams more for better brake force where it matters
it's not a must have, but don't put it on weight.

>>951326
I'm not saying that would be my personal choice, just that for some people weight is a reason for running smaller discs. Other reasons I forgot to mention are greater forces acting on the fork (could either cause damage or eject the wheel from the dropouts), aerodynamics, and clearance issues. If these didn't exist then of course everyone would be running 203mm discs.

File: IMAG0876.jpg (986KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 2560x1440px

Can someone help me identify my bike..?
I know this sounds super stupid, but i never really looked super close at it, but it was just stolen from me and it was a gift, so i'd really, really like to be able to up my chances of getting it back..

>>951330
Looks like a Trek

>>951328
well yeah, you're right, but I just thing weight isn't reaaaally the point between 140's and 160's. If I had the same bike I'd keep 140's because fuck spending money just so I have the rotors looking nice, I'm sure the brakes work perfectly well.

>>951332
I concur. It's a Trek.

>>950386
>>950388
>kerb
It's CURB you fuckin heathens

>>951347
>>951332

after some research, i found out, i think??, that's it's a trek multitrack 7100 comfort hybrid

File: IMG_0374.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

1980's Fuji Del Ray VAlite tubing.
Recently upgraded basic modern shimano parts for vintage Suntour Le Pree derailleurs. It's also got a clusterfuck of random other parts.
She was my dad's until he had me and my brothers, he gave it to me once I could fit it and I've been riding it ever since (~8ish years)

>>951321
>mechanical discs are still SO MUCH BETTER than the brakes of 10 years ago;

Tell that to my Avid SD7s + kool stops you god damn dick brake downtuber

>>951360
Is that chainring on backwards?

File: roadie.jpg (2MB, 2080x1170px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2080x1170px

bought this 3 days ago, waiting for spd now

>>951569
>bought this 3 days ago, waiting for spd now
That paint is awesome. Is that factory ?

File: roadie2.jpg (179KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1024x768px

>>951594
yeah, here's a better photo

>>951429
...no?

File: ohshit-iamshittingmyself.jpg (65KB, 645x433px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 645x433px

>>951200
stop saying 'downtube' you fucking imbecile.
god i fucking hate when people try to make new meme terms
go back to the edge of the ruler you 14 year old

File: rsz_img_20160502_183352.jpg (590KB, 2080x1560px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 2080x1560px

Just finished this build today as a present for a friend, I'm really digging the way it came out

>>951658
Stop angling the brake lever in you silly man, and unwrap that top downtube. Also fix saddle height. Would like if not for this completely unneccessary faggotry.

>>951644
nice dubs you fucking bar end.


Buy Schwalbe Professional bike tyres

>>951660
Tube is wrapped because it's scratched to hell, it looks awful if it isn't. Saddle height and handles are that way because my friend wants them that way, tried to explain the seat needed to be higher but it fell on deaf ears

>>951665
>Tube is wrapped because it's scratched to hell, it looks awful if it isn't.
It looks even worse now. I can say that with complete conviction, even without knowing what the upper downtube looks like. It could be scuffed down to bare metal in patches, and it would still look better than that bullshit cover-up.
You should also get new friends.

>>951596
Noice.

>>951569
you bought what? a red post? all I see is a field of green.

>>951658
why'd you waste all that effort on a shitty BSO?

>>951686
It's clearly yellow or orange.

File: wackybird.jpg (87KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1280x1024px

>>951687
Not him, but I find old department store bikes the most interesting of all. You expect a bike shop bike to be taken care of for decades, but some Sears shit bike owned by a 13 year old in the 70's? Nah

>>951644
>shits himself
>still finishes the race

i can respect that

>>951644
That's why they call it

"The runs"

>>951379
>god damn dick brake downtuber
BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
THE
FUCK
OUT

>>951596
Oh man that paintjob is pure sex

>>951702
you didn't format it right

>I guess that's why they call it
( •_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
>the runs.

>>951718
>you didn't format it right

maybe on plebbit you fucking downtuber

File: new.png (3MB, 1718x1286px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1718x1286px

I really need a better phone

>>951896
Pick up a small digital camera, they're mad cheap and you'll actually get decent pictures

>>951903
you can get a 14-16 mega pickle camera for like £60 or you can get a chinkphone from gearbest for £100 which comes with a decent sony sensor.

>>951907
Megapixels don't matter when the lens is shit, and that's the limiting factor on any phone.

Doubly sucks when it's jammed in your pocket without a cover over the lens and gets scratched up and covered in schmutz from your hand.

>>951896
you dont need a new phone, you need a new bike

>>951976
Fuck off downtubing retard

>>951108
what did the wheelset weigh ?

you might just upgrade the tires to something light and racey.

nicer tyres are a great upgrade as they can improve the feeling of you're ride quite a bit

>>952049
The set I was looking at getting is 1965g, mine are something like 60g heavier assuming 120g for each disc (couldn't be arsed to remove them), including liners and I think I left the front skewer in. I couldn't find any sets that were considerably lighter for the sort of money I'd want to pay.

The new tyres are around 290g which is pretty light already, only about 40g heavier than what I had previously.

>>951660
looks like a top tube

>>951896
what kind of bars are those? are they cinelli criteriums?

looks nice, got any other shots?

>>948714
What the fuck are the point of those if they're so tiny?

>>952155
Front one is for not getting mud on your face. Rear is pretty much useless, only thing it did was keeping my rear light clean. Removed both of them since we havent gotten any rains. I'm gonna put the front one again when it rains.

File: Thomas_Watson_(Puritan).jpg (12KB, 262x272px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 262x272px

how come most of the bikes posted are old bikes?
do all of you actually prefer the design or do you ride them because of cost/availability?

>>952185
Poorfag pride.

Stay here for any amount of time, and you will see poor people being mad that some people can afford nice things.

>>952159
Or just get some actual fenders, fuck. No matter if they work or not, that is still insultingly small for your bike. Look, just stop putting halfassed on such a nice bike. Kludging is reserved for jealous poorfags such as myself.

>>952185
There are plenty of new/newer bikes in this thread, the real thing that makes bikes posted here (and indeed, online in general) different is that there's hardly anything stock. The average bike you see on the street is either a generic newish Trek/Giant/Spec/'Dale or a Walmart BSO, but most people who post their bikes online with pride have some kind of interesting custom setup or a bike with
'vintage' cool factor.

>>952185
They last forever, they look good and yeah they can be cheaper. You can make them a bit lighter/better upgrading components. Most people here (assuming) commute and tour and older bikes provide comfort/reliability without breaking the bank. Plus it's like you're riding a piece of history

>>952185
cost and availability for me, aesthetics are a convenient bonus. My frame is an early alu design so in many ways it's less than ideal

>>948659
just get in there with a boxcutter and rip it out

>>949449
looks like the bike has horrible toe overlap tho

>>949749
if you had 1500 pounds you'd spend it on a fucking raleigh?
Jesus

also that brown saddle is disgusting on your black bike dude come on

>>950524
what a beauty!

>>952212
hell yeah i would, after the reviews on their new road bikes being fairly stellar, the mustang comp i want comes with american classic wheels, sram rival 1 hydro groupset, thru axles, and G-one tyres, which are all pretty great parts, and it was that or maybe an on-one bishbashbosh,
the saddle is comfy and that's all what matters, and i've got a selle royal viper, but that digs in and isn't comfortable, also i haven't really got the money to change the saddle anyway.

File: IMG_4999.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

feeling a p strong need for different bar tape

>>953742
Please not red tape

>>949573
Has potential; get a nice set of MKS pedals and Tektro long-reach brakes

>>951596
t-tell me more about this jitensha, senpai

>>952185
Because any decent bike lasts a long time. Therefor, there are a lot more old bikes out there than new bikes. So statistically, expect to see more old bikes than new bikes among a random sample of bike enthusiasts.

>>951596
YEAAA nigga we biopace now we chris froome symmetry for bitches circles for bitches we oval now we maximumum power shimano GOAT

>>954259
good to see those light photons passing through the translucent bottle cages there buddy, if only you had a front light to pass through that fucking grand canyon gap between your fork and tire

File: 1668.jpg (89KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 700x700px

>>954264
dammit

>>954393
Absolutely disgusting

File: image.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

>>954570
What about this tape

>>954610
cosmo and wanda think they fuckin slick

>>954616
If 20th at state champs is magic

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3412x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3412x1920px

>>954619
I'm not letting it die for some reason

>>948609
Walmart bicycle , plastic crankset

File: 20160510_164407.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>948593

I like mine

>>951896
>what the fuck is auto focus?
lmaoing at your uggy face

>>949528

10/10 would rip fire roads. I bet that thing would feel amazing to pin

>>950613
>>949528
Listen, I get the desire to "know your roots", and klunkin' down a trail with only a coaster brake looks hilarious... but why does EVERY SINGLE COMPANY that does a "modern" klunker have to do the curved and/or bent top tube and 2nd vestigial top tube?

Do these serve some sort of special purpose while klunking, or is it purely a pointless stylistic throwback?

File: image.jpg (584KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1920x1080px

Eddy Merckx 525