The future of flight, they said

File: 1400050891645.gif (2MB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x162px

>Boeing and Airbus can't get their shit together
>sukhoi starts taking shit over starting with the SSJ 130
>mfw

>>947971
More competition would be a godsend in this field.

>>947971
>sukhoi
>taking over anything
lol, they only survive on military contracts. try embraer.

>>947986
>The Huehues ever building anything other than narrow bodied medium range aircraft

Huehuehue

>>947971
>for the very most part
>Murica and Europe make goods that last decades
>appliances, tools, equipment, textiles, etc.
>in comes China
>'how cheap can we make this and that?'
>make shit as cheap as possible
>goes of like this for years
>churning out consumer crap
>buy and throw away; repeat
>china has a reputation for making cheap shit
>literally trusting your life in a chink made airplane built for consumers

Not even once, m8.

>>947945
Boeing doesn't make the engines.

how does something that creates a tornado of fire, have icing problems?

>>948036
This.

>>948046
Still Rolls Royce?

File: 1418292443704.jpg (62KB, 640x702px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x702px

>>948036
>sukhoi
>chinese

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvkEpstd9os

>>948107
>http://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2011/05/02/134597833/cosmonaut-crashed-into-earth-crying-in-rage
>ruskie engineering

File: Apollo_1_fire.jpg (3MB, 4000x2702px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4000x2702px

>>948173
>Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Rodger Chaffee

See, even I can play this game. Your argument is dumb and you should feel dumb.

Ruskie engineering won WWII in Europe and is the only thing that's been getting folks into space for the last five years.

File: shuttle go boom.jpg (24KB, 495x333px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 495x333px

>>948173
nigga this is one game you don't wanna step into

>>947986
Brazil is on the verge of economic collapse.

File: hueinfrastructure.jpg (112KB, 585x854px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 585x854px

>>947986
>flying on a hue plane
Maniacal and incompetent pilots are not exciting enough for you eh, you also require structural failure.

>>948171
The funny thing is that boeing isn't even making money with the 787

http://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/will-787-program-ever-show-an-overall-profit-analysts-grow-more-skeptical/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvkEpstd9os

The guys building the planes don't want to fly in them. Just watch and see what bottom dollar labor gets you

>>948224

>not naming it a challenger disappears