have you guys heard of Schauff bikes im in germany right now

>>930651
>dat backwards seat clamp
>dat stem height
>dat brake lever mounting
>dat everything
Is you friend a crackhead? And no, that's not a reasonable price for a downtube shifted piece of scrap that's been ridden to shit by a junkie.

Offer him 20 euro

really , schauff not even written on the frame. whatever, schauff´s bikes are mostly from 500-3000. Nothing special . If you are looking for a new cheap bike, offer him way much less, about 100 max.

also bike looks not ugly, but not cool either.

Are those collectible?

>>930701
No. They made some nice frames and a lot of bike boom crap. This one har been repainted, and obviously ridden by someone with a very skin deep appreciation for it. That's assuming it realy is a Schauff to begin with, and that's a big assumption.

>>930712
how could i tell if its really a schauff if i went over to look at it?

File: s640_47975601ee6cb64537eae46387094.jpg (96KB, 640x1138px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 640x1138px

more pictures of it

>>930651
pass on it.

File: CampyForgedDropouts_zps0f4dab49.jpg (21KB, 321x370px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 321x370px

seems like an ok beater, because it's been refurbished, but its clearly a low end bike. Definately not a 'racing bike' and it won't be lively or fast. The claw 'bolt on' derailer hanger is the tell. Decent frames have a integrated derailer hanger that the rear derailer threads into. The components are actually alright, but not great, having a square taper not a cottered crank is good. It is geared high so it wont be great for hills. Nothing looks worse than a black repaint, so i don't like it at all.

80 is a much more fair price.

>>930732
Why the fuck would you care if it were? You don't even know what a 'Schauff' is, or why you'd want it to be one.

Did you end up buying this? It would definitely get you from A - B but of course it's nothing special.