ESP progress 2013 - present

>yfw cagers need electronic assistance not to murder everyone in their way

>>1017594
I think you're looking for >>>/o/

But to answer your question: the advances are numerous. The computational power alone is allowing ever more sensors and complex algorithms to be integrated.
I think the next big leap will be the communication between cars and themselves and the infrastructure itself.

>>1017619
Required on all cars since like 2012, compadre.

>>1017695
>Required on all cars since like 2012,
since cagers can't be fucked to actually pilot their cage safely, the state had to step in with an electronic babysitter for them.

coral reefs when?

File: 1404640095685.gif (964KB, 480x270px)

964KB, 480x270px

>mfw my car allows me to turn that gay shit off so i can do awd drifts

>>1017594
I turn that off before i even touch the clutch. Shit ruins cars

>>1017865
>Implying ESP doesn't make for better handling and faster cars.
Why do you think it's banned in top motorsport racing? Where do you think it was developed first?

>>1017733
0/10

>>1017737
About the only time it makes sense to turn it off is in low traction/off road environments.

>>1017869
It's b& so drivers must rely more on skill. It's nothing to do with speed.

>>1018064
Yes, it's banned so that drivers have to rely on skill more, but you can take a turn more quickly if the car automatically adjusts torque, braking, and the suspension for you. This is why it was developed in the first place.

>>1018066
If we're adding all that in on top of traction control then of course you'll be faster.