Paragraph about how album is not very good

Response about album not being good and that you're right

>>75076591
>>75076603
>t. insult

reddit

Random comment about artist being a nu-male accompanied with facebook frog image.

>>75076591
A stupid bait comment agreeing fiercely with OP to gather (you)s

humblebrag about owning it on vinyl

An obviously false comment about how my uncle knew the dude who worked on it, and the artist was a dick

reddit dot com slash r slash coaxed into snafu

This thread is really fucking stupid, and everyone who posted in it should feel bad about their sense of humor

File: Autism cap.png (235KB, 433x402px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 433x402px

A long post, describing how bad the album is, going into depths, yet, to the posters whom seen the album, can see through the fact that this poster in-fact hasn't listened to the album, as every problem he describes is non-existant or made up.
Its size of the post is due to an attempt to make one's opinion more legimite, while containing no real criticism of the album; as each complaint isn't present in the album, or is incredibly subjective, such as; not liking the mixing of the album or finding the lyrics juvenile.
If lyrics deal with personal issues, mostly depression; then the lyrics will be critized no matter how good those lyrics actually may be, the post now goes on to claim that the post is the artist just whinning for (put a lenght of the album here) minutes/hours.
And in this part of the post the anon goes on to compare the album to the past discography, either claiming how better it was, providing examples that seem to once again show that the anon is not a good listener as the examples given make little or almost no sense to anyone whom has heard these records.
Now, here comes the part where anon tells you that the artist/band you liked was actually never good and their past efforts, which the anon liked, were either done by sheer luck or because of the band/artist working with an artist they consider better/more talented. And will conclude that this band never had anything of value. Perhaps he will even mention that he feels ashamed that he has ever listened to this band/artist, just to anger/bait you more, to make you more angered and give you more motivation to reply to his post.
The post finally comes to a close, perhaps additionally insulting/mocking any fans, for enjoying the new records, perhaps calling them delusional that they still follow the artist, even if the anons may legimetelly like the music.

The post comes with an image to annoy you as well, perhaps trying to imply that the fans may have some form of disability.

>>75077178
The anon who posted this post will also additionaly reply to his own post, pretending to be somebody else and will agree with himself, he does this to make this post seem more genuine and hard to argue against.

>>75077234
witty comeback

Anon refers to Anthony Fantanos opinion on the album and follows it as gospel

Anon refers to Anthony Fantano's opinion on the album and purposely forms the opposite opinion

Completely unrelated comment about some meme artist some /mu/ users like

lmao /mu/core sucks bro

>>75076678
(You)

comment about how /mu/ sucks

Political bait comment often using the words nu-male, cuck, SJW and leftist

Another long post, this time in the defence of the aforementioned album, and will be peppered with both legitimate points and memetic buzzwords for padding. These types of posts typically go into a track by track analysis (and for some albums [cLOUDDEAD, Spiderland, etc.) maybe even section by section, before all these are consolidated into a perspective on the album as a whole. The person behind this post might not have formal musical knowledge, but will try their best anyway and throw in as many musical terms as possible. As an extension, they may also try and list off any influences this particular album may have had in its particular genre.

Lastly, this post will certainly try and equate personal, emotional feeling given from this album and try in a vain attempt to apply it to any other post that refers to the album in the negative, under the justification about how they "just don't get it". When done right, these types of posts end being surprisingly eloquent and well-thought out for something on /mu/. When handled poorly, however, they can come across as an attack stemming from both a need for damage control and a subtle degree of autism.

>>75079510
>(Quote taken from anon's long post where he compliments one specific track)
Here this post simply laughs at the anon for finding this song enjoyable, he does not really argue in any way, he simply laughs and claims that the anon is wrong for this, absolutely ignoring rest of the post and not providing any argument.

Post pointing out the repeating digits at the end of my post number

>>75079741
Post mocking you for a failure in gaining repeating digits as you've been expecting.

>>75079741
Post pointing out your failure whilst secretly hoping for his own repeating digits without explicitly saying so as to avoid the same fate

>>75079495
Getting caught in the bait, attempting to argue with the post, also will make sure to send this poster to Politically Incorrect board

File: IMG_5207.jpg (28KB, 220x302px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 220x302px

Post that's a copypasta of what Scaruffi said about the album or artist who made the album in question that will spark a debate on whether or not he's a valid critic.

>>75079801
(long chain of replies that derail the already deteriorating thread)

Off topic bait post about Grimes that derails the thread

>>75079891
Response to the bait in a negative manner

It's about time this board embraced reddit's humour, it's already got their music taste

File: Piero_Scaruffi.jpg (32KB, 600x586px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x586px

>>75079929
The same poster sends you to the Reddit website and proclaims that is a place where you should have stayed for having this positive opininon on Grimes.

Stop anons! this is the path toward apathy

>>75079949
I always get the same disgusting feeling when I come here. /lit/ and /mu/ need to die.

>>75079822
Post saying that the numbers at the end of this post confirm the information carried within it

this is literally the best thread ever

this is how meta threads should be

>>75080171
wtf /lit/ is a thousand times better than /mu/

>>75080171
theyre the only good boards, along with wg