Why do you hate ANCO? I don't like them myself but why do you?

>>75043473
ive never hears any of their music and ive never really wanted to. they look like a bunch of twats but im sure theyre nice guys

I hate their talent, perfect percussion, memorable yet elusive melodies, and refusal to waste all that on depressed and angry music or attempting to be profound when they're musicians not philosophers.

I love them because they're nu-males.

My boyhole is never satisfied

>>75043473
They're Philip Glass for hipsters.

i hate them because they haven't made more freak folk like HCTI

>>75043473
i love them

>>75043617
what does this even mean
Philip Glass is already for hipsters

>>75043473

I like ANCO but I find the constant drone of noise to get a little tedious.

>>75043894
Have you listened to Meeting Of The Waters? It's pretty good

>>75043473
Better question: what in particular makes Here Comes The Indian consistently rated as a GOAT?

>>75043937
yeah i finally got around to checking that out yesterday actually, pleasantly surprised

>>75043930
Phillip Glass is for hipsters the same way Led Zeppelin is for hipsters, meaning he's not. Everyone listened to him in western Berlin during the 1980s. He was some incredibly normie tier brainless shit. Plus all his music consists of are arpeggios, which is essentially ANCO's shtick.

>>75043953
inaccessibility

File: 1504919749143.jpg (195KB, 886x600px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 886x600px

>>75043473

>>75044244
>arpeggios
Do you even know what that word means?

Their music doesn't sound very good to me

>>75044675
I wouldn't have used a word I don't understand. The fact that you're questioning my usage of it implies you either don't know what an arpeggio is or you have never listened to either artists.

>>75044780
Stop deflecting, what does it mean?

>>75044780
>Yeah, theyre discography consists of nothing but arpeggios... In The Flowers, Esplode, the list goes on....

I want pandas cock in my tight butthole-ru

>>75044831
he was probably thinking of my girls lol

>>75044675
Okay, I'll spoonfeed you you fucking musiclet. An arpeggio is the pseud's way of tricking someone into thinking the pseud knows how to play an instrument. You sit at a piano, pick out a chord, then play out the notes within the chord individually. This gives the uneducated the impression that you're doing a lot when really you're not.

Here is classic example by le retarded Philip Glass:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FySi6xXkNqo

Here is the gimmick "composed" by Le amazing Panda:
https://youtu.be/-Nul1rDq-ns?t=327

>>75044831
Oh wow, you actually have to hand select pieces that don't use it? Lmao, thanks for proving my point. They overuse the fuck out of it and you know it

>>75045019
Bro clam down

File: IMG_2335.jpg (37KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 360x360px

>>75045019
>Proudly explains the 4th grade music term to me. (And why he thinks it's bad, only exposing his own songwriting neurosis)
>Posts most well known album which is intentionally reliant on arpeggios for its aesthetic.
>Doesn't get joke, and becomes angry by this.

File: 1463175916294.jpg (69KB, 500x669px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x669px

>>75045037
Nice comeback, lil sis

>>75045069
I was unironically responding to this >>75044813 post. You're right that it's an elementary fucking term which is why I don't get why the anon even questioned my usage of it in the first place. At this point you're literally just baiting me.

>>75045077
Who's a cute kitty, u r

>>75044485
that would be danse or hollinndagain

>>75045112
I was the original one who asked because MPP is basically the only album which relies on arpeggios/gimmicks, and is also viewed lower than the most of their discography. The other guy was the "deflecting" guy.

>>75045199
Yeah I accidentally responded to your post twice instead of the other post, my mistake

>>75045136
that would be those as well

>>75043473
I like feels