/Paul McCartney/

not old enough, apparently

>>74984499
thanks man i needed a good laugh today

>>74984499

>also best Beatle general

You misspelled Ringo Starr

>>74984511
>>74984550
Two plebs and...
>>74984551
One comedian detected

Does /mu/ stand for "music"?

>>74984499
THE

>>74984499
I cant remember how old I was when I first heard Ram and Band on the Run. prob about 22 or 23 y/o

/mu/tants are just ppl having a series of epiphanies about music, believing the popular album is the good one, then thinking it's not, then realizing it actually *was*, back and forth, forever, until somebody buries them

>>74984739
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

What's your favorite McCartney album?

>>74984772
i dont listen to paul mccartney.

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNDDDDDDDDD ON THE RUUUUUUUUUUNNNNN

>>74984787
That sucks. Come back when youre not a retarded faggot.

File: R-6097463-1410989633-8888.jpeg.jpg (94KB, 400x402px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 400x402px

>>74984499
idk, but this is fantastic even if it isnt wings

File: Wings.jpg (360KB, 764x382px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 764x382px

Rank Wings albums, friends.

>>74984579
>Does /mu/ stand for "music"?
Yes.

I don't see how someone disagreeing with you about the Beatles would make it not music related.

>>74984499
can someone or anon actually explain why they think this? they're a good band but i just don't think they have the same lasting power as the beatles. also silly love songs come on now

>>74985196
I've enjoyed Red Rose Speedway and Venus/Mars much more than I've enjoyed almost any beatles project. I still like both decently but Wings released 2 projects I would put on more frequently.

>>74985082
Band on the Run > (Over America) > Wild Life > Back to the Egg > Venus and Mars > London Town > Speed of Sound > Red Rose Speedway

>>74984499
Mate, Wings never was better than the Beatles, but Paul is the best beatle, I'll give you that.

>>74985196
They weren't, although Paul had some pheinomnal albums solo and with wings

>>74985196
OP here, controversial subjects get people to post in threads. I dont actually believe that Wings were better than the Beatles (I think they were on par), but look at the response, niggaaaaa

>>74985859
Bait threads almost always work.
But I don't think they were on the same level. That was just Paul's band, the Beatles was John's, Paul's and George's at some point, and they had their own musicianship to contribute.

>>74986479
Paul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John > George

>>74984499
Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings?