ITT: Rate the /mu/-core like this template in comments

File: sketch-1504410275631.png (1MB, 1920x535px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x535px

My picks

File: coar.jpg (142KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1192x332px

never listened to SFTB

File: 4L_KuwGCiUJ.jpg (59KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 750x422px

/mu/core is unironically good and only contrarian think otherwise

File: familycircus.jpg (46KB, 600x630px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x630px

>>74928537
Giving Pet sounds a 6 and Aeroplane Over the Sea a 9...

File: thing.jpg (148KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1192x332px

>>74928537

>>74928774
shit, ITCOTCK should be an 8

>>74928877
>>74928844
>>74928831
>>74928741
>(138 KB, 1192x332)
>138 KB
>>74928721
>>74928631
>>74928614
>>74928607
Confirmed racists
>>74928774
smart man

File: 1504410130564.jpg (155KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1192x332px

i couldn't decide

Half this shit is not /mu/core. True mu core is as follows:

ITAOTS, OKC, Kid A, Loveless, ITCOTCK, MPP, MBDTF

Anything else is sub-/mu/core.

SFTB and Pet Sounds are a 10

Everything else but TVU&N is a 5

TVU&N is a 4

File: mucorerated.jpg (142KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1192x332px

>>74928968
Forgot rating

>>74928978
Oh wait nvm LYSF and Spiderland are 8

>>74928968
It hasn't been this way since at the latest, late 2014 though. Welcome back I guess?

File: 1504410130564.jpg (137KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1192x332px

I would have changed the score of ITAOTS to an 8 but couldn't be fucked to change it so yeh

>>74928978
>visceral

>>74929011
Doesn't matter. /mu/core isn't something that changes based on trends. The whole point is that it's the permanent basis of the board, and it's those albums. Until a new album gets released that is as big as MBDTF /mu/core doesn't change. sub /mu/core is for the FOTM shit

>>74929055
It does though because the users themselves cycle in/out of the board, making certain sets of albums more or less popular.

>>74929026
>rating ITAOTS higher than SFTB
>giving TMR a "omg how iz thiz musik??" score
go away

>>74929052
None of the records that are /mu/core are particularly visceral. What do you mean by this?

File: 4L_hkAkJnTE.jpg (3MB, 1781x4325px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1781x4325px

>>74928968
that's the /mu/core some ass blasted Radiohead fag came up with because /mu/core and sub-/mu/core wasn't littered with their albums. THIS is /mu/core

File: tpab.jpg (896KB, 1831x824px) Image search: [Google]

896KB, 1831x824px

>>74929125

>>74929155
What does people copypasting Scaruffi reviews have to do with this?

>>74928537
American Football is the only album I'd consider bad

Pet sounds is the only album I don't get but I wouldn't necessarily consider it bad

>>74929073
You're still missing the point, the reason /mu/core was created was so that it could be shown to new users and they were quickly given a crash course and what the foundation of the "culture" of the board is. It's not just a list of well-liked albums, changing it based on what's popular among the current crop of users defeats the point entirely

Besides, if it was really a list of the most popular albums recently, then it would be more like: kendrick - taylor swift - kanye - david bowie, etc etc

>>74929145
no. No one gave a shit about Talking Heads until fantano talked about RIL and TMS is a fucking 2012 album. American Football, Spiderland and LYSF were always considered sub-/mu/core. Radiohead is the most essential group aside from NMH

>>74928954
what the hell does any of this mean

What's the album with the house that says america on it??

>>74929288
NEW UNDERAGE B& MODSMODS

>>74929288
To Pimp a Butterfly

File: incredulous.jpg (4KB, 266x189px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 266x189px

>>74929170

>>74929222
What the fuck are you on about? /mu/core has always been based on sheer popularity. Not some "crash course" as you say it. This is why that Antlers record isn't there anymore and why it even used to be there in the first place.

Fantano talked about Remain In Light seven months ago. The memes around it are far older than that eg. the one about it being some kinda horrible album being from 2015. TMS, along with Death Grips in general have always been memed the fuck out here. American Football are often brought up especially when the emo threads happened, and even more so when that house was being sold. Spiderland is posted about numerous times every single day and is one of the most loved albums on /mu/. LYSF along with most GYBE is part of some new meme or another all the time. First it was crescendo core, now it's "emotional dishonest" or w/e. You obviously haven't been here in the last few years to realize this. Kendrick to some extent definitely deserves to become /mu/core but he's often brought up in an ironically negative context which to some is unironic so we don't know how that'll go. Kanye already has his spot. Taylor is just waifu shit and nowhere near as popular. Bowie is also not brought up THAT often either.

At this point, I am thinking you just looked some shit up about /mu/ rather than having actually posted here if you think the /mu/core was nothing but a crash course. It has never ever been that way, not to mention if it was just the foundation of the board it would be nothing but metal and indie rock stuff.

>>74929326
http://www.scaruffi.com/vol7/lamar.html#top

That's what that is. Not sure what you mean.

>>74928721
>>74928844
>>74929056
>>74928607
>ITAOTS mediocre rating
>ITCOCK high rating

Vapid Poser Paradigm Revealed

File: cheers.jpg.jpg (15KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 227x222px

>>74929411

>>74928614
How can you rate boring chord strumming a 9 over everything else?

File: mu.jpg (315KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1192x332px

>>74929379
>Money Store same rating as Pet Sounds
disgusting....

>>74929390
>/mu/core has always been based on sheer popularity

No, it's not. You have clearly been here for 4 minutes total. Loveless was never actually a popular album here, it was just recognized as essential to the culture of /mu/ and rock music in general and so it is on there. Same with ITCOTCK. Hospice was never considered /mu/core, it was always called sub-/mu/core, along with the aforementioned American Football and Spiderland, and also Funeral, and when TMS first came out people were calling it sub-/mu/core. sub-/mu/core was literally a term invented to describe popular albums that aren't fundamental like true /mu/core

None of these albums are "memes," xxxtentacion and vaporwaves are memes. You calling everything a meme doesn't support your arguments or explain anything. Bowie is brought up extremely often over the past few years, and is one of the most frequently appearing artists in chart threads. Taylor gets a small shitstorm everytime a new track or vid is released. They are clearly some of the most popular artists the past few years here. Grimes too

Anon please don't try to act like you've been here long when you clearly haven't. /mu/core is not just a list of the most popular albums, it's supposed to be the foundation of board culture. Not your reddit "memes" or whatever

>>74929540
>The Money Store that high
disgusting...

>>74929145
I still think we should change this slightly. Instead of sub-/mu/core and classics section, change it to sub-/mu/core, scaruffi-core, pitchfork core, and rym core (there's enough difference between them to fill out at least 150-200 spots).

Also there needs to be a classical and folk section, it's criminal that there aren't ones already included.

>>74929568
i fell for the death grips meme, sorry to disappoint friend...

>>74929560
>it's supposed to be the foundation of board culture
you just contradicted your whole argument idiot. that /mu/core that was just posted is fine because, as you stated, it's the foundation of board culture. Kid A is enough of a representative for Radiohead as it's more representative of board culture than OKC is, and we dont need 10 fucking radiohead albums to get that point across. if you don't think Loveless, Spiderland, LYSF are all the foundation of board culture, then you are retarded

File: official.jpg (154KB, 1192x332px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1192x332px

>>74928537
thoroughly flawed scores OP.

I've provided about as perfect a power ranking as is objectively possible

>>74929560
>Loveless was never actually a popular album here, it was just recognized as essential to the culture of /mu/ and rock music in general and so it is on there. Same with ITCOTCK.

I had a minor stroke reading this. These are some of the most popular albums here, easily. You don't just throw up (((essential culture))) albums on the /mu/core list, its just about what people here listen to.

File: Mu-core2012.jpg (289KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1000x1000px

>>74929560
>Loveless
>ITCOTKC
>not popular
What the fuck? This is objectively not true. Both get posted about every day all the time.

>Hospice was never considered /mu/core
The very popular pic from 2012 already proves you wrong. It also was there as /mu/core in the big mussentials charts for a bit, too.
>None of these albums are "memes"
They aren't "memes". They are memes though.
>Bowie is brought up extremely often over the past few years
Only for occasional shitposting usually based on Scaruffi's review on him. Sure traffic on Bowie was up after his death, but that has calmed down.
>Taylor gets a small shitstorm
You already said it. Small.
>Grimes is among most popular
That recent poll says otherwise where an overwhelming majority said they don't like Grimes. Perhaps if you actually were here long enough, or maybe went to Grimes threads to see how few people actually post there, you would know this.

>>74929288
All American Rejects - Move Along

>>74929451
>someone who likes prog should like indie
Is this what you're trying to say? Because that's just ridiculous.

>>74929708
>you just contradicted your whole argument idiot

That's exactly what I've been saying since the beginning though, but it's always satisfying when people resort to petty insults and vapid statements when they realize they have no argument

>>74929751
Oh really? show me the multiple threads up about loveless right now, since it gets posted "every day all the time"

>>74929752
That's a pic made by memers and revisionists, 2012 is way too late. Actually any pic of /mu/core is too late

>Only for occasional shitposting usually based on Scaruffi's review on him
Bowie exploded in popularity here ever that first revival album, and maintained that until his death. Only now has it calm down. I truly do not believe you've been on the board for longer than approx. 6 months if you don't think Bowie is a top 5 most popular artist here the past 3 years

A small shitstorm is way more than virtually any other artist gets for every new track. A poll on 4chan tells you nothing, obviously everyone hates grimes but that doesn't affect his enduring popularity the last few years.

>>74929843
Eat my ass if you wanna say Loveless doesn't get spammed and then call someone else out for not knowing this board, chew my fucking poopoo.

>>74929843
literally check any chart thread and you'll be proven wrong

>>74929451
>being retarded

>>74929843
https://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/mu/search/text/loveless/

>>74929843
>>74929560
>>74929222
>>74928968
are you seriously sperging out this much because there aren't 2 Radiohead albums as /mu/core? your idea of /mu/core is literally the same plus a few others which are also insanely popular a memed about

>>74929843
>That's a pic made by memers and revisionists, 2012 is way too late. Actually any pic of /mu/core is too late
Prove this.
>Bowie exploded in popularity here ever that first revival album, and maintained that until his death. Only now has it calm down.
Meaning that he's literally not eligible for /mu/core how fucking retarded are you?
>I truly do not believe you've been on the board for longer than approx. 6 months if you don't think Bowie is a top 5 most popular artist here the past 3 years
You haven't been here long than a few days if you think this is true. Every artist that's /mu/core now is far more often posted about than Bowie.
>A small shitstorm is way more than virtually any other artist gets for every new track.
But fucking tiny compared to /mu/core.
>A poll on 4chan tells you nothing, obviously everyone hates grimes but that doesn't affect his enduring popularity the last few years.
Which is why I said to analyze that data along with how many people post in HER (not his) threads. This has to be some shit attempt at trolling.

>>74929903
No, it proves me right.

>>74929945
Only 1 thread over the past week about MBV. Nice try though.

>>74929055
>FOTM
>3 years
A month is actually 1/36 as long

>>74929976
>No, it proves me right.
9 mentions of Ok Computer in the day of September 2nd. 17 mentions of Loveless.

>>74929970
>Prove this.
there's nothing to "prove"

>Meaning that he's literally not eligible for /mu/core how fucking retarded are you?
How fucking retarded are you that you can't follow what I'm saying? I'm saying he's not eligible for /mu/core but under your revisionist memers' view of it he should be

>But fucking tiny compared to /mu/core.
Right, which is why /mu/core is eternal and there hasn't been a true /mu/core album since MBDTF

>grimes
>a woman

And I'm the troll?

>>74930006
>it's more mentioned than this other album that I never said was popular, therefore it's popular

Can you really not remember why you posted that link in the first place

>>74930030
>there's nothing to "prove"
Prove that it's just muh memesters. You can't just spout shit out of your ass. I can say that stars aren't real and some crazy conspiracy but that doesn't make me right.
>How fucking retarded are you that you can't follow what I'm saying? I'm saying he's not eligible for /mu/core but under your revisionist memers' view of it he should be
No he wouldn't because his popularity calmed down AS YOU SAID. How dumb are you?
>Right, which is why /mu/core is eternal and there hasn't been a true /mu/core album since MBDTF
Nope, it has never ever been that way.
>And I'm the troll?
Yup.

>>74930030
>>74930030
>>74930030
>>74930030
>>74930030
that should be enough for the night you hungry boy. now go away and stop bumping this gay thread.

>>74930077
I'm declaring them memesters. It's just my opinion of the people who made that image, and all /mu/core "charts" really. If you don't believe in stars, you're pretty dumb nigga, you can fucking see them.

>because his popularity calmed down AS YOU SAID

I was operating under the assumption that most popular on the board means most popular over the last few years, not right at this very moment like a fucking derivative. If that's the case, then /mu/core would be 17, American Dream, that queens of the stone age album, and that taylor swift album that's almost out

>>74930142
>I'm declaring them memesters. It's just my opinion of the people who made that image, and all /mu/core "charts" really. If you don't believe in stars, you're pretty dumb nigga, you can fucking see them.
Keyword here being opinion. Current /mu/core is based on actual data taken from a long term poll for /mu/'s favorite albums that went on for a couple months and had 100s of albums nominated. These albums were tops of a literal popularity contest. Nobody gives a damn about your opinion.
>I was operating under the assumption that most popular on the board means most popular over the last few years, not right at this very moment like a fucking derivative.
In which case Bowie doesn't come close because Bowie posting was low until he died then it was high, and now it's low again.

>>74930200
You keep posting about "polls" like internet polls given on 4chan are meaningful in any capacity. And again the point is not that it's the most popular albums, it's literally the opposite of that point. original /mu/core was created by smart anons who understood the cultural zeitgeist and its origins, and created /mu/core. Mainly for the purpose of introducing new users to /mu/ and preserving the culture of the board

>because Bowie posting was low until he died

No it wasn't. Again, you have been here for less than 6 months if you think Bowie is not top 5 most popular artists over the last 3 or 4 years

>>74930253
>You keep posting about "polls" like internet polls given on 4chan are meaningful in any capacity.
Because they gauge what's popular here on 4chan? Like, fuck dude it's statistics. You're on some "fuck the facts and reality, let's go ignorance and retardation!" level shit right now.
>And again the point is not that it's the most popular albums, it's literally the opposite of that point. original /mu/core was created by smart anons who understood the cultural zeitgeist and its origins, and created /mu/core. Mainly for the purpose of introducing new users to /mu/ and preserving the culture of the board
Never, ever been that way. I provided evidence, and you provided your bullshit opinion for it.
>No it wasn't. Again, you have been here for less than 6 months if you think Bowie is not top 5 most popular artists over the last 3 or 4 years
Nope. The old /mu/core set of artists you keep referencing that's the "true" /mu/core alone already surpass him there. He's surpassed by even more. If he was truly that popular his albums would've been ranked higher up on that poll I am talking about.