the co-opted media is at it again.
>>74889172
>extraordinary album
>8.5
what did they mean by this
Should be at least a 9
>>74889185
words don't have meaning anymore, atleast on pitchfork dot com.
remember, this is the same site that once upon time called a grizzly bear album ''challenging''
>>74889185
that p4k ratings mean fucc all and rarely represent the review, and if you haven't realized that by now ur kinda dumb
>>74889185
To be fair, only ~1-2% of albums they review get BNM. This still deserved over a 9 though.
>>74889185
pitchfork ratings mean literally nothing
the only way to get over a 9 is if you are kanye west, beyonce, or kendrick lamar
>>74889172
Underrated. Should have been like a 9.2 or so.
overrated
>>74889281
beyonce has never gotten a 9, dipshit
>Only 8.5
Why do they even try anymore?