Albums over 90 minutes—too long?

Why would you delete the tracks? Just skip them

>>74843998
Yes, you simply are a pleb

>>74843998
>being this autistic

>>74843998
t. ADD ridden millennial

Well at least you've listened to every track at least a few times before you delete the weak ones. Right?

>>74844028
Almost every album this long is bloated and self indulgent. No point in me pretending to like all of the tracks just to feel cultured.

>>74843998
that album is comfy af

>>74844260
i prefer longer albums. usually after awhile i find tracks i like more. and some i realized sucked

>>74843998
>Does any album actually justify that length?
i believe to be kind does, bitches brew, tupac's all eyez on me

>>74843998
That album is rife with filler but it's more than the sum of its parts I would say.
Most canonical double albums though would be a lot worse if you got rid of tracks: Blonde on Blonde, Electric Ladyland, Songs in the Key of Life, etc. Regardless of what your personal favorites are, those albums are partly legendary because of how hefty they are.

>>74844311
birches brew is like 5 tracks of instrumental jazz. i think thats a lil different.