I saw you shilling that album last week
>>74843587
Can someone please explain this album to me? It seems extremely formulaic and excessive, especially with the "ambient" parts. I just feel that with the amount of ideas they had on the album, they could have finetuned it and made the album significantly shorter. I want to get into the album more, can someone help
>>74843657
Anon maybe pop music is more your speed
>>74843657
I'm not a music theory nerd or anything, but to me it feels incredibly cinematic and simultaneously serene and chaotic. It's just enjoyable.
>>74843673
I don't like pop music. That didn't really answer my question either
>>74843692
Ya I get that completely, but they just start with a riff and then they build it up grdually and then get louder, then stop and then do it over again with a different riff. That's why I feel like there's something I'm missing because people praise the album so much
>>74843764
I dunno, it might just not be your thing. It's definitely one of my favourite albums, but taste is subjective and all.
>>74843464
Always thought it was a shame the cover art makes it look so amateur
>>74843764
There's a reason alot of people just call it Crescendo-Core
>>74843821
I've never listened to it, but I like the art.
>>74843821
this, the disparity between the music and the quality of the album art is massive
>>74843764
>>74843692
Hello summer :^)