Explain this

a) Reputation isn't out yet
b) This comparison doesn't even make sense

>>74811869
you have too much free time and need to get a job

The albums on top are obviously selling based on the artist and how attractive she is

The albums below are not and rely more on content.

File: b579af432b8dd52d574813bd842c1541.jpg (277KB, 755x255px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 755x255px

Explain this

>>74812187
That one's quite easy to explain, I feel. They're both artists with interests in other fields of music and that ended up interested in pushing the boundaries of their own genres through fusion while still keeping pop sensibilities. That said, how it matches up is actually quite uncanny, but it's not that surprising.

Kendrick's next album is going to be a masterpiece.

>>74812187
Did this in another thread but I'll type it again.

>Mediocre debut
>Underrated masterpiece, beginning to experiment
>Critics favorite
>Fans favorite/Most experimental
>B sides from the previous album
>Weaker compared to other projects but not bad.

>>74811869
they are both commercial music aimed at a similar demographic

>>74812319
Radiohead is aimed towards people who struggle to ask for Ketchup at McDonalds

File: Wojack Worried.jpg (44KB, 569x506px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 569x506px

>>74812345
FUCK

>>74812187
pottery

>>74812345
Kek

File: 1500495298163.jpg (297KB, 1205x490px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1205x490px

>>74812345
called the fuck out