JUST

File: ?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegeminigeek.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F05%2Fnose-hair.jpg&f=1.jpg (30KB, 603x446px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 603x446px

>>74801112
give me a whiff!

File: 1501250120587.jpg (31KB, 540x892px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 540x892px

>>74801112
hahahahaha this is fucking corny as hell

>>74801112
OK, we know Taylor messed up.Now can we save these threads for November when the album actually comes out?

File: ts_lwymmd.jpg (45KB, 539x151px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 539x151px

>>74801988
>Taylor messed up
Lol nope

>>74802095
literally could've released a 2 sec video of her loosing a fart and would've got similar viewcount, maybe more. also having a marketing team doesn't hurt. artistically, she fucked up, a minority of people think it's a decent song

>>74802207
Doesn't help that she's marketed on here.
For the past week, the front page has been flooded with swift threads. It's fucking ridiculous.

File: 1502805478779.png (166KB, 952x982px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 952x982px

>>74802095
> Implying YouTube views determine a song's quality

>>74802207
imagine the BRAPposting

>>74801112
That cover art looks like it was made by some 16 year old fan on deviantART.
What kind of amateur bullshit?

>>74802095
>literally could've released a 2 sec video of her loosing a fart and would've got similar viewcount
Lol nope

>>74802267
Never mentioned "quality". She just clearly did the right thing commercially. Kanyetards are just gonna have to learn how to keep sucking it.

Literally my fave Taylor song

>>74802430
so how would you have done the whole newspaper with taylor swift all over it design?

idk i think it's relatively understated

>>74802809
If she released a video of her loosing a fart we both know it would get at least twice the views.