I'm typeless.
Patrician idealized.
>>74755648
i am definitely iv now actually which is funny because i used to laugh at the top two sections every time i saw this
still don't know what the fuck evolutionary or danger music is though
I'm somewhere between 3 and 4. I don't really see what separates 4 from 5.
>>74755648
3-4
Type 4 genres are more accessible than 3 imho
>>74755648
>songer/songwriter
I attempt to like a good portion of each stage
>>74756233
>>74756249
What??????
this is sonorism right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1e7uI562l0
>>74756135
Danger music is compositions that call for the performer to physically do things that will harm them or the audience.
>>74756496
I think so
>>74755648
I'm spread across the bottom four, thin on both ends.
>>74756496
>Threnody to the Victims of Hiroshima
fuck that shit forever, that's still the only music that inspires genuine terror for me. Makes me so uncomfortable.
https://youtu.be/HilGthRhwP8
>>74755648
i used to find this pretty funny, but now i've kinda realized that many of the genres presented in the upper layers aren't really that obscure or weird.
Not trying to sound 2patrician4you, but there are definitely more things to transcend to
>>74755648
>Type-V
>Sonorism
Penderecki is a meme-tier composer
I am amused that this is still posted. Old revision though.
>>74756496
Yes.
>>74756135
Evolutionary music develops itself according to algorithms relating to fitness, selection, mutation, etc. Danger music means the performer and/or audience is through some part of the performance of music exposed to real or perceived danger.
>>74759107
>>74756135
/mu/ is evolving.