ITT: Post albums with great closing tracks
even if the rest of the album is hot or miss
>>74747408
hit**
>>74746588
You're supposed to post albums with GOOD closing tracks, anon!
>>74746588
why? pretty lose theme for a thread tbqh
>>74746607
good
>>74747408
bad
>>74748208
bad
>>74748451
GOOD
>>74748501
there are no good tracks on that album
off to a bad start, lads
>>74748591
Yes
>>74746588
>>74746588
Literally every Radiohead album
>I MISS YOU
a closer so good that y'all already know what album im talking about
DI Go Pop as well.
>>74750046
fuck yes
>>74751062
Yeaah I love how this album ends. Everything went downhill from there, even If I think Pinkerton is an amazing second record.
>>74751004
my nigga
>>74751062
came to post this
>>74750089
I wish they had sawed off a bit off the wankery at the very end, I think the track could've ended at "I'm sorry dad no I'm not making this UP"
>>74746607
Oh lordy. Still one of my top 5 songs of this decade.
>>74751782
it definitely needed to end before "im nothing without you my darling please dont ever leave" because that's beta as fuck and borderline ruins the song
the bagpipe solo was ok tho
>>74752014
Yeah I like the bagpipes, the guitar that comes in afterwards is excessive tho for sure, also agree about the beta lyrics
Idk man, sometimes I listen to the album and think it's a genuine 10/10, sometimes it barely scrapes a 6. Gotta be in the right mood for it (read: halfway hammered and depressed)
Amnesiac is a close 2nd
>>74750691
Not really
>>74750716
>>74750796
>>74750882
>>74751062
these
>>74752339
its my 2nd favorite after My Love Paramour
>>74752435
best opener imho
the obvious one
Apple pie was a beauty
>>74748541
shit taste wow
>>74753164
Such a shitty band
Best song on the album
>>74753564
Giant Swan too
Motherfucker
>>74746588
People get way too caught up on whether or not this album, and Train in Vain in particular, are 'punk'. Whatever it is, it's fucking awesome.
>>74753919
no one ever listens to me when I say a lot of Clash songs are prog rock.
>>74753956
that's because that's fucking dumb and inaccurate lol
>>74754006
Lost in the Supermarket, Straight To Hell, those are the examples I usually bring up, there are many more you could call progressive though, I'm not talking in the Genesis sense of prog rock.
>>74754079
in what sense are you talking then?
>>74754129
in the sense that they progressed rock, but they did use a lot of new themes and unconventional styles in a lot of songs, Straight to Hell is the only song you could actually label as prog rock though.
>>74754189
>in the sense that they progressed rock
Wow, putting them in the category of literally tens of thousands of rock albums, what a goddamn descriptor
Next you'll be calling any rock song that's ever been heard via radio waves "space rock"
>>74754189
I've heard it referred to as post-punk, but that doesn't describe the entire album either. I guess it's as close as you'll get though.
>>74754563
Oh fuck, my negro
>>74753467
Unironically this
>>74754189
The Clash can't be prog, they actually had a sense of melody