When will people realise this is the Loveless of the '10s?

>>74746390
Not enough vacuum cleaners

Great record tho

definitely not loveless

still a great record on its own accord f a m

>>74746390
When will people realise that this is not even the best 2015 beach house album?

File: 1503213182050.jpg (134KB, 420x594px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 420x594px

>>74746390
are you trying to imply that every song sounds the same on Loveless?

>>74746474
Yes

How is it possible that a band makes the same song 50 times?

Levitation is their best opener but the rest of the album is a let down by comparison.

File: 1503208399548.jpg (27KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x375px

>>74746497
listen to Only Shallow and Sometimes
then tell me they sound the same retard
I can't believe there are people who find it hard to get Loveless

No.

when will people realise shoegaze is dead horse genre?

>>74746390
you can make that argument about Teen Dream (still wrong)

>>74746390
It has one good song.

>>74746497
This cannot be further than the truth,
every track on Loveless is groundbreaking in how it uses texture in every track completely differently

B-but it's not even the same genre. Are you trying to frazzle me?

Levitation and Sparks are great but that's about it

>>74746435
>>74746523
these anons speak the truth. Lucky Stars is the more consistent and impressive album.

>>74746609
I get hard at loveless

>Not at all innovative
>Not shoegaze
>Not noisy

??

>>74746406
>>74746428
>>74746474
>>74746617
>>74746668
>>74746886
>>74747353
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfiJRsRW8vQ