ITT:We post bad music reviews and ratings.
>>74742083
forgot to post the link
http://web.archive.org/web/20011111105022/http://www.rollingstone.com/recordings/review.asp?aid=2043238
Wagner was a hack
That's a good review though, the content is negative but the review is well written
>>74742083
Classic
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/5799-the-fragile/
4/5 for a critically and fan panned album
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/uno-20120913
ERSATZ
>>74742083
>because his new noise mostly just sounds fukqed up
https://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/john-maus-we-must-become-the-pitiless-censors-of-ourselves
still defies explanation
>When I find nothing redeeming in 90% of an album’s content I will usually, out of something like sportsmanship, at least entertain the hypothesis that I just didn’t get it. In this case, I can’t bring myself to care. There’s obviously some kind of art-school mindfuckery afoot here, and I suspect that Maus aspires to some meta-theoretical point on the level of “But really, what is music anyway?” And maybe reality is just the hallucination of a five-dimensional computerized intelligence! Generous guy that I am, I’ll concede that We Must Become the Pitiless Censors of Ourselves does, on some level, constitute music. Really shitty music.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/turn-blue-20140505
>>74744783
what a shitty review
qwerty100
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/7342-nyc-ghosts-flowers/
>>74744783
my favorite part is how he actively sought out maus's writings just because he knew that he didn't have enough content for a review, and then uses it to attempt to criticize the actual album
I can't decide if this review is incredible or terrible
at least old p4k reviews had teeth
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/8104-lateralus/