the last rockstars

You could make an argument that they were the ones that killed it

>>74687680
>You could make an argument
>doesn't make one
White people everyone

Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yheH2YMO70Y

>>74687680
Nah, that was grunge.

>>74687664
>Oasis
>Rock
>Not brit-pop

That's not Fred Durst and Kid Rock.

>>74687840
britpop is was a culture or movement, not a genre

>>74687883
"Britpop is a UK based music and culture movement in the mid 1990s which emphasised "Britishness", and produced bright, catchy pop music partly in reaction to the US led grunge music and the UK's own shoegazing music scene."

The sentence should finish with "It's also shit music"

File: CJdSyUV.jpg (65KB, 530x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 530x600px

>>74687664
these are not Foo Fighters

>>74687958
ah, wikipedia, the foremost expert on music. skimmed through the page, it also acknowledges that britpop was a cultural movement rather than a genre

>>74688045
It also said that its a music genre.
Anyway, are you an expert in music that can claim "its just a cultural movement" with nothing to support it? can you show me your credentials please?

Anyway, how is britpop a cultural movement?
Can you show me ONE source that talks about britpop without talking about it as music?

>>74688123
it was clearly meant to highlight how stupid it is to say that it isn't rock because its "britpop" as if theyre mutually exclusive. rock is a genre and britpop is a movement in which theres both rock and pop music. even rock and pop arent mutually exclusive.

its like saying the cure isnt a rock band because theyre goth.

>>74688215
Why they are not mutually exclusive? I can say that they are not mutualy exclusive in one way: both are shit

File: IMG_5138.jpg (60KB, 790x444px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 790x444px

>>74687664
*The last rockstar

File: blur_63.jpg (33KB, 500x285px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x285px

Out of the way, kids.

>>74687664
>Wonderwall
>rock

>>74688403
Yeah, it's obvious fucking Smooth Jazz isn't it

>>74688414
It's fucking pop. Nothing rock about Oasis at all.

>>74688485
Can you tell that to >>74688215?

Fuck outta here montie

>>74687680
I love Oasis when I'm in one of those moods, just pure feel good mindless rock

kind of like the strokes

>>74687982
foo are too cute back to be legit stadium rock

>>74688350
how is this even a question that Blur is better than Oasis. Even if you don't like Blur or Damon's other projects, you have to admit that they atleast tried to shake the britpop sound and experiment with different genres.

>>74687680
They were top and remain so lad

File: bd9f497e487f404282a577b35e16ee21.png (350KB, 535x357px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 535x357px

*blocks your path*

>played in front of 90 000 people
more like 20 000

File: 1463769670CarSeatHeadrest20160404TN_4220.jpg (126KB, 640x474px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 640x474px

>>74687664
don't mind me, last rockstar comin through

File: 1492195032798.jpg (34KB, 472x480px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 472x480px

You fucking morons forgot about Kanye West.

Weren't Chester Bennington and Fred Durst and all those fags rockstars?

>>74687664
That's not Taylor Swift.

>>74688824
What are you even talking about?

>>74688350
Shite.

>>74687680
and that argument is?

>>74689194
Do americans really consider whiny angst bands like linkin park rockstars?

>>74690156
Retards keep saying that they played these big concerts to like 90,000 but thats complete bullshit. No way they played to more than 20k people.

Why do nu males hate Oasis so much?

T S

R H

I Y

T T

E E

>>74689194
more like rapstars

Sh8t t8ste m8

>>74690612
That they were basically the logical conclusion of rockstars, a couple of lads who just wanted to get party, play in front of thousands of people and to be arrogant sods while doing it, and so why would anyone continue after it?

>>74690805
they were probably bullied by guys lile noel and liam

>>74687664
Imagine being this inbred and retarded.

>>74690921
You're asking why anyone would want to be rockstars after Oasis?