What's going to be number one?

>>74684657
The Doors

>>74684657
obscure black power album

>>74684657
Pet Sounds or VU and Nico maybe Sgt Pepper.

>>74684669
unironically kill yourself

>>74684664
>>74684669
We get it, you guys care more about politics than music.

>>74684657
something nu-maley

>>74684711
>ts obvious they only promote niggers and they will always pick a nigger

a music website hurts your feelings to the point where you go full tunnel vision, disregarding actual facts.

As long as it's not pet sounds I'll be happy

>>74684688
t. kendrick fan

>>74684808

We get it, you're triggered.

File: Tropicalia_Capa.jpg (422KB, 780x768px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 780x768px

this needs to be in the top 10's at least

File: 5476.png (590KB, 855x479px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 855x479px

Holy christ they're actually going to put jazz on this aren't they? They're going to numerically rank A Love Supreme and Monk's Dream alongside Velvet Underground and Simon & Garfunkel albums...

What about Trout Mask Replica? Does that have a chance of ranking high?

>>74684886
They're a business trying to make money and Hip Hop is the most relevant genre within their target demographic. It would make zero sense for them to go bankrupt focusing their content on indie garbage that nobody listens to. Start your own fucking blog if you don't like it.

>>74684939
So then their reviews are irrelevant because they only care about money

>>74684939
>indie and hip hop
>60s
Yeah I'm gonna ask you to kill yourself

File: mu.png (240KB, 1919x1155px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1919x1155px

Why are the people who aren't on this music board to discuss music allowed to derail threads?

>>74684965
Sure, if that's what you want to believe. In reality, they're just a review website which is focused heavily on one or two specific genres. Most reviewers aren't doing it for free and nobody is forcing you to read P4K if you don't like their ratings.
>>74684967
Obviously, the issue people have with P4K on here is the fact that they stopped focusing on indie shit and currently focus on Hip Hop/R&B

>>74684927
probably going to be on 60-something to basically say like "this is groundbreaking and shit but lol no"

File: Pitchfork 2009 to 2015.png (1MB, 1007x1976px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1007x1976px

>>74684664

Correct, Pitchfork does

>>74684891
listened to it yesterday, it's so fucking good

>>74684657
They picked "God Only Knows" in their 2006 list of "The 200 Greatest Songs of the 1960s".

Already tons of black women on that list, and that was 11 years ago.

However, black women aren't as famous for albums in that era.

>>74685097
to be fair 2009 was a dog shit year for hip-hop if im remembering correctly

>>74684657
Pet Sounds

>>74685390
yep, and 2015 was a shitty year for indie rock desu

>>74684685
>unironically
The word is seriously you dumb cunt

>>74684774
They give horrible trap albums like 7+ how isn't that obvious

>>74685034
If all they care about is money then their reviews are meaningless. They arent a website they are a commercial

>>74685444
how new

>>74684657

>People always ask: "When is Pitchfork gonna run a list of the top albums of the 1960s?" The answer now? Probably never. Not that we didn't consider it. It's just that when we sat down to map it all out, we found it would be more rewarding to approach the decade through its songs instead. After all, it was by and large a single-oriented era-- the long-player didn't really take over as a creative medium until the 60s had nearly come to an end. And besides, Revolver 's ego is out of hand as it is.

why they chang there mind?

how the fuck is this getting derailed into a race conversation? its the fucking 60's for crying out loud.

>>74684657
"In The Court Of The Crimson King" at least top 5

>>74685390
>the music on that 2015 list
>not dogshut

fuck off, nu male

>>74685598
12

>>74684657
TVU&N or Pet Sounds

>>74684664
This.

Or blah blah blah "give peace a chance" bullshit.
The 60's are dead. Let them stay dead.

>>74685430
Indie rock gets no mainstream music industry play. This isn't 2009 when it was still somewhat even of a playing field.

>>74685578
A certain rise in right wing populism.
Member-berries to drag people away.

File: famm.jpg (18KB, 350x235px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 350x235px

>>74684664
imagine thinking that this is a sensible thought to convey

>>74685845
What? The promotion of black extremism?
Or criticizing that promotion?

>>74685582
>its the fucking 60's for crying out loud.

the absolute height of racial tension in modern times?

>>74685905
It's impossible to not bring up the cultural change and race issues, or sex issues, or any cultural marxist memes.
All happened in the 60's. The peak of soviet subversion.

File: 6789.jpg (80KB, 960x654px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 960x654px

How guys how about instead of being eternally perma-triggered faggots that can't open this list or this thread without getting offended by the presence of black people in American music you don't don't look at the list or open this thread?

>>74684657
I hope Hot Rats.
>>74684664
What worries me is that they're probably going to ignore most of the Blue Note catalog. Unless they're lurking in this thread.

>>74685952
How bout you go fuck yourselves I'll will anything I want to will.

>>74685977
>What worries me is that they're probably going to ignore most of the Blue Note catalog. Unless they're lurking in this thread.

yeah they're definitely lurking this thread and will update the list by tomorrow based on your autistic opinions

>>74685985
fuck yh connor, you sure showed him!

A love supreme

>>74684886
jesus christ have some self respect. your whining is pathetic.

Banana, Revolver, Highway 61 or shit like that.

>>74686012
Do you really think p4k contributors aren't familiar with 4chan?

>>74686057
no one who writes for p4k reads /mu/, idiot

>>74686023
Fucking tired of this
>hurr your triggered
>hurr your just one of those "extremists"

That's basically saying "stop having opinions and stop feeling anything". You're being trained into pets.
https://youtu.be/4i6jtsCpImo

File: 4537.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>74685985

>How bout you go fuck yourselves I'll will anything I want to will.

>>74686071
If they do I want them to do this.

Do whatever sounds best, not whatever fits an agenda best.
Or you'll lose more and more views.
Look beyond the major label garbage.

I'd have velvet underground and nico #1.

>>74686079
you're the one having a hissy fit about a list that's not even out yet

>>74686096
>no helmet
and he calls himself hardcore

>>74686027
>You're kidding yourselves if you didn't think the black panthers weren't black extremists.

and this is why everyone can tell you're a /pol/ fag. who the fuck else would think this was a reasonable debate to start in a music discussion board.

>>74686071
wouldn't surprise if they do

>>74686119
Perhaps they'll fucking listen then.

Besides, we all know why this is suddenly coming out of the woodwork.
If it isn't impressive then pitchfork loses all credibility.

>>74684657
>they think anything that isnt a beatles or velvet underground album is gonna be p4k's #1
you actually have to put effort into getting as irrationally upset as the people in this thread

>>74686149
>calls other fag, offers no actual counter argument

good one, jamal!

honestly kinda excited for this list. i dont care for the top spot considering it will probably be an album that im familiar with (vu and nico, beatles, coltrane etc) but i dare say there will be some nice trinkets around the bottom or at least something ive never heard of before.

>>74686234
I'm hoping they go more independent and obscure.
But after seeing their latest reviews I don't expect much anymore.

File: so.gif (498KB, 300x195px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 300x195px

>>74686227
>tries to turn the music discussion into a political one
>gets called out for it
>I CAN DO WATEVA I WANT REEEEEE

really makes u think

>>74686227
you sound immature

>>74686227

cringe

>>74686303
I've been called me a lot of things. And that happens every thread that anything remotely opinionated gets thrown up.

I've seen weeks of this crap and now I'm venting my untameable wrath at this shit.
The immature one is the one that usually points the finger and calls them immature.

>>74686355
self importance and poor historical generalizations are more of a problem in society than whatever leftist hippie boogieman you've come up with

>>74686388
You're the cringe. You gutless runt.

>>74686355
why do i get the impression that you're underage?

>>74686400
>poor historical generalizations
I thought it was a strong historical generalisation.
That's like your opinion man.

>leftist hippie boogieman
The frankfurt school is no boogieman you fucking cunt.

probably the Kinks because its the number one choice of posers

>>74686234
>>74686276
Yeah really, I'm completely positive that the top will either be Beatles or some black artist. Their agenda is to have their opinion be based on what they view the popular critical opinion to be, or more recently to just promote racial/social stuff over music.

>>74686440
Because your scared of expressing opinions other than "woah this guy isn't conforming I better call him underage".
Upsetting you? Good. I wish /mu/ was more upset.
Your too fucking pretentious and tightassed.

>>74686478
If it's Hendrix I probably won't mind, but in this day and age everything is touchy.
I can't just listen to the sound nowadays without something from either side of the spectrum pissing me off.

If anything, I wish I had the 60's innocence and foolish expression. Now it's nothing but doubt, groupthink and a lack of expression.
Pitchfork should capture that. Focus on that.
Maybe both sides of the spectrum will finally empathize with one another.

>>74685552
I've been here for years dumb faggot I still don't like that word or it's overuse I recent years, same with cringe

>>74686478
>or some black artist

oh right, because your just that confident in the idea that no black artist from the 60s could have trumped all their white contemporaries in terms of over all quality? you people are pathetic.

>>74686557
Everything's cringe on this board now apparently.
I think we need to go back to a time where we spoke our minds more freely.

I want that the most. Freedom.
If anything, the 60's tried to capture it, but in capturing it, it became an abomination by today's era.
Things like woodstock were more than simple peace and love.
It was FREEDOM.

>>74684657
top 3 = Banana album, pet sounds and a love supreme

Blonde On Blonde or Revolver

File: LMAO.jpg (8KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 256x256px

>>74685097
>artists of colour

>>74686646
Not even the best albums of their respective artists released in the 60s lmao

>sgt peppers won't make the list

callin it

>>74686234
literally the only normal post in this thread

>>74686598
fag

The Beatles

>>74684657

If it's not Pet Sounds I hope mods will ban every mention of Pitchfork on this board

>>74684657
either some beatles album or >>74684664

>>74684664
last poets?

>>74685582
because it's pitchfork. if it was any other site it wouldn't happen, but because we all know pitchfork's agenda (even if you pretend to be unaware of it), everyone is placing bets as to whether they'll give extra points for nonwhite artists, like they do in their present-day reviews.

>>74685766
>"give peace a chance" bullshit.
p4k is on the antifa violence memewave, they wouldn't do that

Top 3 will be Pet Sounds, Highway 61 Revisited and Revolver.

>>74685598
Critics still generally don't really care for prog (mostly rightfully so desu)

>>74687060
I think they'll want to distance themselves from the RS Top500 a little further.

>>74686071
multiple pitchfork writers are confirmed to come here

>>74686848
they named god only knows the best song of the 60's, i just get a feeling that autoatically DQ's pet sounds from winning, but it'll probably still be in the top 10

if piper isn't number one i'm sending death threats to all writers at shitfork

>>74687203
you should start writing them then.

>>74686992
>if it was any other site it wouldn't happen

well of course anon

the likes of Jimi Hendrix, Otis Redding, John Coltrane, Love, Sly Stone, Sam Cooke, James Brown, The Supremes and the rest of Motown only get mentioned by Pitchfork and were never universally praised before the creation of that website, always needed some help. the jews! haha

>>74687108
Eh, the reason that list seems so ridiculous is because it's supposed to be the greatest albums ever, here it's specifically 60's. desu it'll look pretty try-hard if they don't have those near the front.

>>74687224
i take it back. this anon >>74687310 made me remember that a love supreme came out in the 60s

>>74685598
But anon, Prog is the whitest genre, there's no way.

File: 1401159709046.jpg (23KB, 720x581px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 720x581px

>>74685001
>le /pol/ boogieman

>>74687415
They're not really proving him wrong, buddy

>>74684657
they'll somehow find a neo-male album even though the 60s featured great paleo-male music

>>74685001
>/mu/ agreeing with one another

Nice joke fagget

>>74684657
a better question is what popular and praised album will they leave off for political reason?

File: 5103eTFY39L.jpg (41KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x499px

It will almost certainly be this

>>74687080
Kill yourself numale fag

File: 1492869639569.jpg (59KB, 470x340px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 470x340px

It will probably be Sgt. Peppers.
Pet Sounds is the better record.
But VU&Nico deserves it.