Your favorite band BTFO

>>74619452
Theyve always sucked

>>74619452
Pitchfork hates the newer UK bands so much. If the band doesn't have a black man coming out as a gay along with r'n'b sounds then it isn't good.
They will never give Everything Everything a good chance even if they realese the best album of the decade since one of the masterminds of the website is Ian Cohen who hates them so much he put their debut a 4.0

7.1 is a good score from pitchfork. It means worth checking out but not essential which is the majority of all good music honestly, most of it is in this category of worth checking out but not essential

Stop talking about pitchfork

This thing is good

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-18 at 2.26.54 AM.png (532KB, 948x694px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 948x694px

Reminder

I greatly dislike them as professional performers for refusing to go on because "No one came."

>>74620454
what's this referring to? google didn't help

>>74620638
A free show in Austin last year. They said it was "food poisoning" but that was right before they were supposed to go on and Money had been berating the entire crowd literally except me. So if they didn't already hear, I think he went back and told them.

Is it better than E•MO•TION?: Everything Everything: A Fever Dream

Pitchfork rating for Everything Everything: 7.1

Pitchfork rating for Carly Rae Jepsen: 7.4

Conclusion: No.

>>74619452
It makes me cringy how they compare their lyrics with some random stand up faggot that no one knows just because they are both from the UK.

File: lol mu sucking pitchs dick again.png (63KB, 706x327px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 706x327px

>>74620437

Nah... REMINDER