What's wrong with Rolling Stone?
>>74514187
They gave Green day uno which is a meh tier album a 4/5
>>74514187
Rolling Stone is literally the most normie music outlet besides Billboard
It's a nostalgia site comparing everything to when music was good.
The only publication that recognizes shit for shit. Wow so arty she has a fat ass and plays the harp, 10/10!! Nah fuck off she sounds like a cat in a blender
>>74514214
It's more like hot garbage and I like Insomniac
>>74514289
How much are they paying you? Rolling Stone isn't even really a music publication.
>>74514335
>Rolling Stone isn't even really a music publication.
says who?
>>74514187
There wasn't enough David Grohl to jerk off to.
>>74514359
Anyone with common sense. If you've ever read Rolling Stone, they're actually more of a liberal politics magazine than a music magazine.
Has Rolling Stone ever actually been an influential publication, other than maybe artists "getting the Rolling Stone cover"? Pitchfork pretty much brought Arcade Fire and Bon Iver into the mainstream, as well as ruined the careers of Jet and Travis Morrison. Has Rolling Stone ever had actual influence over something?
>>74514289
Joanna's music is Sublime. It's time, for you to rest now. Slip into your jimmy jams, slip into bed, and then slip into a coma.
>>74514431
it is a cultural artifact at this point. No influence except for the name and people over 40 years old touting it as an important magazine.
>>74514431
>Pitchfork pretty much brought Arcade Fire and Bon Iver into the mainstream,
two shitty artist. no wonder music pubs all suck ass
>>74514187
>MSN music
>>74514187
A lot is wrong with RS. I'm pretty sure the review also refers to the album as an EP.
Low test faggots incapable of admiring THAT ASS
>>74514187
Joanna Newsom music is the hipster plebs favourite
she's overrated
can't sing
has no catchy songs
I can't name one of hers that I liked.
Rolling Stones is on the ball.