no bandcamp?

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-08 at 20.31.16.png (43KB, 1047x306px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1047x306px

quick, everyone post stats

File: stats.png (23KB, 974x314px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 974x314px

>>74429753
i don't even shill

File: Capture.png (22KB, 850x258px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 850x258px

Why do we even?

>>74429935
that's better than most people have ever done. aren't you satisfied?

>>74429958
My question was rather towards the idea of the threado.
>aren't you satisfied?
Sort of. Though I recently announced the project's finished so it's possibly an aftermath of that.

Your plays don't mean shit if there are many incomplete and skipped plays.

>>74429993
Okay papa

>>74429993
That depends a lot on how accessible the music is and what kinds of people are listening.

File: stats.png (52KB, 885x756px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 885x756px

only reason for the giant spikes in downloads is apparently a bandcamp bug, got reimbursed the downloads. usually around 10-15 of my album per week

>>74430112
Download stats don't mean a lot since albums and tracks are given the same weight.

>>74430151
Nothing has a meaning. Your point being?

>>74430151
they're all albums, for whatever that's worth. I pretty much never have single track downloads except for a standalone track I covered

to me download stats mean a lot more than plays because it's people actually taking the music and (potentially) listening to it on their own