Influence is one of the only objective qualities we can take

Pinetop - Boogie Woogie

File: 6.jpg (28KB, 500x419px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x419px

>>74339938

who influencer here?

>>74339938
So Nirvana are objectively bad because they influenced Nickelback and Creed

>>74340126
did you even read the OP

Frogposting is one of the only objective qualities we can take into account when judging /mu/ posters.

furthermore, there are some posters who have been shitposting with frogs and no decent content for a long time. Should we make it a rule that anyone who downplays the importance of these non-music image thread starters are immediately disregarded, because it can be factually shown that they are shit at posting about music? Also, what other shitposters should be included in this revered echelon?

Note that I'm not saying the content of these threads can never be criticized. I'm just saying that the shitposting of these retards literally cannot be denied, and anyone who tries to do so should have their opinion immediately disregarded because of their demonstrated lack of knowledge of music related reaction images.

>>74340163
Kek

Influence is objective indeed, but it has no bearing in the music's actual quality, nor it should be taken into account when criticizing a musical piece.

Influence is just an indirect measure of popularity.