Name a more adventurous and daring number one hit single Protip:

you're probably right
at least the song has one thing going for it

"Good Vibrations" (1966) by The Beach Boys

>>74339358
t h i s

>>74339358
Beach Boys sucks

>>74339738
not as much as ur mum

>>74339358
are u memeing? it's not that much of a departure from their earlier stuff.

Hot Butter - Popcorn (1972)

>>74339358
what shitty taste you must have

She Loves You - The Beatles

>>74339358
Good Vibrations isn't very adventurous or daring, it's just a basic RnB-esque rock song with "weird" (for the time) instruments.

>>74341210
>"Good Vibrations" established a new method of operation for Wilson. Instead of working on whole songs with clear large-scale syntactical structures, Wilson limited himself to recording short interchangeable fragments (or "modules"). Through the method of tape splicing, each fragment could then be assembled into a linear sequence, allowing any number of larger structures and divergent moods to be produced at a later time. This was the same modular approach used during the sessions for Smile and Smiley Smile. To mask each tape edit, vast reverb decays were added at the mixing and sub-mixing stages.

Telstar by The Tornados produced by Joe Meek

>>74341342
I'm Not in Love by 10cc as well

>>74339865
>>74339738
>>74341319
t. Plebs

>>74339358
/thread

>>74339217
Laurie Anderson - O Superman

>>74342498
Oh never mind, that only got to number 2

>>74339244
Why don't people on this board like this song? Is it just because it's overplayed?