ITT: /mu/core albums that are actually good.

File: header.jpg (44KB, 460x215px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 460x215px

>>74325048

>>74325048
most of them

they wouldn't have made their way into such cultural relevance if they didn't appeal to somebody

everyone's allowed to have their opinion but seriously most /mu/core (which is way different to what it was) is actually not bad at all

>>74325048
decent album, but has some shit songs that should be removed

File: Hospicecover.jpg (15KB, 325x328px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 325x328px

I haven't seen this one posted in a while, but it's still /mu/core

>>74325290
cultural relevance =/= quality

Guns N Roses, Joy Division, Tool, Swans etc. are praised by a lot of imbeciles. does this mean they're good? absolutely not

>>74325355
problem is I only agree with you on Guns N Roses

I actually kinda like the rest

>>74325355
also I made a fucking point about personal opinion are you retarded

>>74325048
I never understood why people here only said they enjoyed Never Meant and that's it.

This whole album is consistently great

>>74325355
>Tool and Swans
>bad
Them's fightin' words, anon

>>74325430
that's the worst song by far actually

The thing about American Football is that every emo/indie kid loves that album. It's not exactly exclusive to the /mu/ board

ITAOTS is the only actually good /mu/-core album

>>74325430
The rest of the album is considerably less radio-friendly. The extended instrumental sections are kind of a pleb filter

>>74325422
it's not really a matter of personal opinion, but aesthetics

>>74325489
>but aesthetics
and this means what?