not very good, this.

Link please

>>74264785
only two links out there right now are rapidgator and oboom. both terrible hosts. i can link it if you want, but i cannae be asked to upload it.

>>74264468
how is it compared to ears??

>>74264468
shut the fuck up yoda

>>74264946
it expands almost exclusively on the vocal tracks from EARS. technically, it's probably better than EARS as well - mixes are denser but cleaner.

however, it lacks in the quieter moments that made ears such a balanced record. here, it feels at times verging on anco levels of exuberance and imo, it doesn't work.

vocals are also even more prominent in the mixes than they were on EARS and it's pushed too far. they dominate everything else most of the time.

it ears was an 8, this is a 6 at best.