let's talk about this.

>>74242854
havent listened.
Someone tell me whether to listen to it!

that's one deep cover right there

>>74242894
try it, it's very much an artwork of it's own time dealing with political struggles but also with people being numbed my media. very interesting

>>74242951
How much progressive narratives does he spin in this one? I know how smug he gets

File: file.png (362KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 540x540px

>>74242854
Muse took one look at that album cover and went "You think THAT'S obvious?"

>>74242993
he does that very much. it's told in a way that seems like someone just randomly skipping between TV-channels and someone sitting in a bar and watching the TV. using these TV-channels he tells a story of war and loss, and how the media numbs people to the point that war is just as normal and acceptable as having dinner. it's honestly written in a very smart way, with the way the lyrics are written reflecting the idea of skipping between TV channels.

>>74242854
Gotta be the Water's best solo work. Although, vocals are too tough to listen to. Just nothing compared to voice that he had on "The Wall"

>>74243010
muse invented the word obvious with that album.
aside from being obvious, it was still a pretty good and diverse album sonically, and it had an interesting narrative.

has anyone listened to the remaster? was it any good?

>>74242854
Only solo album from Waters I listened to was Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking. How does it compare to that?

>>74243074
I heard it won a Grammy last year for the best sound. haven't listened to it, though

>>74243076
This one sounds more like Floyd then pros and cons.

>>74242854
Pretty good, better than all Pink Floyd past The Wall

>>74243063
Go to bed, Roger

>>74243168
not until i've made my 60th concept album about politics!!!!

>>74243206
He can keep doing that so long as it sounds good.