post an album and rate it! 6/10

File: Low_(album).jpg (43KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 300x300px

5/10

File: demonbox.png (358KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 500x500px

8/10

File: FaceApp_1500786546429.jpg (393KB, 999x999px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 999x999px

>>74101839
I would give those teeth a 10/10! Smile, Dave!

File: Jacket_m.jpg (3KB, 120x119px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 120x119px

9/10

File: 20170723_012203.png (76KB, 720x639px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 720x639px

9/10

File: In_Rainbows_Official_Cover.jpg (49KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 300x300px

Without the hype Radiohead's In Rainbows (Radiohead, 2007) would simply be a mediocre attempt at making slightly adventurous classic rock music. Abandoning their pretenses of innovation and futurism, Radiohead returned to their rock roots with a guitar-driven album that features precious few electronic/digital effects. This is U2-style arena-rock for the 2000s. The syncopated blues-soul shuffle 15 Step the half-baked hard-rock of Bodysnatchers (reminiscent of pathetic attempts by the Beatles to reinvent themselves in the age of Cream) or Faust Arp, a Beatles-esque elegy that has been heard countless times in the history of pop music, are not only inferior material by any standard: they are plain amateurish. To make matters worse, the album includes a whole set of sub-pop ballads, from the slow Nude (a long unreleased song, originally titled Big Ideas) to the even more moronic All I Need and House of Cards. 5/10

epic

File: MEMELORD.jpg (7KB, 209x204px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 209x204px

>>74102390
10/10 opinions

>>74102390
piero was 100% right on this one

File: R-431005-1366663498-4209.jpeg.jpg (86KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 600x600px

6/10

>>74102547
What a great smile, Piero!

Don't forget to look up what he says about the so-called pleb filter one.