Sonemic just lunched

Thought the beta was launching the 22nd. That's weird.

ahhhhhhh bibliotec aorelia

looks cheap and unprofessional
embarrassing

unironically hate it

fuck this sucks

There's a lot of useless space and things are too big, but I don't think it's that bad, desu. last fm's re-design was way worse.

dammit, can i keep old rym?

>>74054286
yes, sonemic is just made up from the catalogue on RYM.

>>74054286
yeah, it's only an open beta rn
I'm pretty sure the layout will change if enough people complain

>>74054377
i may have to leave if RYM changes to this

File: bduck.jpg (24KB, 480x336px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x336px

>>74054497
don't worry, Sonemic will NEVER get out of beta

File: robotmad.jpg (1MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x1000px

>>74053942
>>74053981
>>74054286
>>74054497
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH IT YOU HIPSTER FUCKWADS? DOES ANYTHING EVER PLEASE YOU? YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT TOOK TO PUT THIS TOGETHER? ANY IDEAS? FUCK OFF. KYS.

>>74054585
i didn't think anything was wrong with the old design really

>>74054585
t. sonemic employee

I fucking love all the new cool features!

This is AWESOME

This is pretty nice. Can't wait till release!

looks like a mobile site on desktop which is never good

This isn't that damn bad, for a beta anyway. Consider me excite.

hey, it's pretty good

File: 1499761517364.jpg (20KB, 367x346px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 367x346px

The new features are neat, but holy fuck is this site ugly.

what are the cool new features to try?

>>74054585
in the end, it doesn't even matter

I can't see my rating curve on my profile.
Anyone has the same issue?

How do I find the first example of a genre? They used to sort releases in a genre chronologically and I miss that.

Profiles are kind of a colossal mess.

File: 1363065058590.jpg (101KB, 450x368px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 450x368px

>Getting stuck on sign up

Wow great fucking site. Loving the features.

File: bestgameever.png (69KB, 862x284px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 862x284px

reminder

So all of our old accounts will just carry over, right?

>>74054908
Best game 2017

>>74054784
>holy fuck is this site ugly.
I love how people have been saying the same thing for every single RYM update.
I think the site looks great. The stars however look bad.

>>74054805
Charts, Compatibility

>>74054853
https://sonemic.com/music/genre/rock/

>>74054896
>having a single digit IQ
I'm so sorry for you.

>>74054939
Yes, but I would make a back up of everything anyways.

looks fucking awful

File: 4817548104759.jpg (59KB, 395x401px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 395x401px

>sonemic finally comes out
>it's shit

post yfw

RIP RYM Stars ????-2017
Press *what my name says" to pay respects

File: 1459491128357.jpg (106KB, 560x510px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 560x510px

>>74054956

>Caring about what a tripfag says

I like the older more minimsltic HTML based look. This new one looks over bloated and space usuage is bad.

>>74055023
>not forcing anonymous and then complaining about tripfriends
Are you, perhaps, retarded?

>Boris has 9 bolded albums now

at least they let you search multiple genres in the charts now

So, will everybody be able to see song ratings, or is that going to be a subscriber feature?

>>74054805
Suggestions for albums is my favorite thing I've found so far, looks like profiles are also getting a major revamp but that's in super beta

what. a. fucking. mess.
this is what they spent dozens of thousands dollars in?
did they just leave designing and coding to the interns?

>>74055023
I'm on your side anon

>>74055058

And could that tripcode even get more pretentious.

the search feature is waaaaaaaay better

>>74055146
See >>74055058
Are you, perhaps, retarded?

>>74054585
Calm down, Sharifi

File: 1441753576542.png (118KB, 297x413px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 297x413px

>>74055058

>forcing anonymous

Nah. Also,

>caring about what tripfags say

the circle instead of the stars is a mistake

i keep getting errors with the charts...

>>74054956
also the customized rating systems!

>Using the new charts for look for more albums like my favorite
>There is only one album
>It's my album


>tfw my favorite album is actually unique

>>74055283
in what way?

>>74055274
I get errors if I don't specify a genre

can i log in with my RYM account?

Anyone else having troubles signing up? I get an infinite loading screen after filling out the signup information.

>>74055714
Yes

File: r.png (53KB, 633x538px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 633x538px

>>74055380

>>74053799
oh fuck yes finally

>>74053799
KID A > WYWH DADROCK IS UNEQUIVOCALLY DEAD

>>74055745
Oh, ok. I can see why the use they used the circles.

>>74055128
where do i find suggestions?

>>74055128
The suggestions are amazing. I'm getting things I've actually never heard of, even on mainstream stuff like J Dilla.
>>74055857
On an album page. Just scroll down a bit. They're underneath the issues.

>>74054683
Of course you would

>can search by descriptors

literally the only thing i cared about

average score by friends doesn't show up on album pages anymore

>>74053799
What the fuck happened to these ratings???
Weezer Blue Album at 3.99?
I'm not complaining about the score, but that's quite a jump. Also, no more Pet Sounds at 10?

Looks pretty dope

the site is growing on me desu

They should make a 4th site for books.
GoodReads is shite.

>>74053799
>Oh cool, let's go look at glitchwave
>NHL Hockey 2017 top game

>>74054552
comfort me, banana duck

>>74056953
I'd be down

File: 1496881986851.jpg (34KB, 637x416px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 637x416px

>NHL 17 is the #1 game on glitchwave

>>74056953
They should make a RateYourEverything desuu

>>74056953
What about a site for television?

>>74056953
I'd rather have one for TV. As far as I know, there's no website whatsoever that lets user submit and rate TV. There's major ones for everything else, even if goodreads sucks.

>>74057199
I would like to have a site where we classify people in characteristics as if it were genres, a social network, could be interesting imo.

>>74057242
>what is imdb?

>>74057242
imdb

>>74057325
>>74057351
Can you submit shows on imdb? It's also movie movie oriented.

>>74057387
more movie oriented*

Cant sign up. Only says loading.

won't even check it out sounds like it has some very very basic bugs
sounds like an embarrassment of development work
made by some newb web dev that has no fucking clue what they are doing
lol.

>>74055083
?

>>74057532
Same. fucking dropped

>>74057242
trakt. its shit but its there. and yeah u can submit.

site looks pretty good imo. doesn't look bloated at all

File: Capture.jpg (42KB, 877x463px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 877x463px

somebody please kill me

>>74057319
That would fuck up the world, dude.

>>74057319
We need this

File: dying, send help.webm (738KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 640x480px

>>74058014
Why am I laughing so hard?

>>74058084
No we don't. Shut the fuck up.

>>74058014
Please somebody fucking stop this website

>>74058176
Rude

>>74058084
Just imagine it, right wings, left wings, transexuals, cisgenders, sick people, religious, satanic, atheists, megalomaniacs, audiophiles, gymnastics, depressives; any aspect of the human being that you can classify, it would be the epitome of classification

>>74057319
make it, m8

>>74058311
Stop.

>>74058311
I love it
>>74058404
Aw muffin

>>74057319
I think even the facebook obsessed narcissists of our generation would be uncomfortable with this.

File: 118.jpg (34KB, 450x444px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 450x444px

>>74058311

>>74058441
you say it like that's not the exact reason we should make this a reality

>>74058494
Holy shit for once I agree with you

>>74058084
>>74058311
>>74058430
>>74058494
what is wrong with you people

>>74058490
hey sal
what do you think of Sonemic as of now

File: 1467951288924.png (158KB, 387x430px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 387x430px

>>74054908
>>74058014

>>74057319
I had this idea like two years ago, and I'm pretty sure other people had it before me. Iirc there's even a Black Mirror episode about this.

>>74058494
I am very much in favor of anonymity and a lack of "doxing" on the internet and so I find your idea completely deplorable and I want you to go glue your butt to a cactus that's on the back of a pickup truck driving over as many potholes and speedbumps as it can find.

>>74058540
You lack the vision man

>>74058540
I just like drama

>>74058628
laaameee
anyways, this has nothing to do with doxing (in principle)

>>74058559
hey anon
i don't like the design too much but the extended search options are great and exactly what i was hoping for

>>74058659
>anyways, this has nothing to do with doxing (in principle)
That's why I put it in quotation marks, I wasn't quite sure of how to phrase what I was saying effectively but I hope you understood ok.

Seems neat. I'll come back when it's actually usable.

Why would they get rid of stars? This new circle bullshit is insanely ugly.

Glitchwave has way too many sub-categories for franchises. The Call of Duty franchise page reads like:

Call of Duty 3
2006
Call of Duty: World at War
2008
Call of Duty: Ghosts
2013

Missing 5 games from the franchise because they get completely split off into "Modern Warfare" and "Black Ops" sub-categories. The Super Mario section is just a nightmare to navigate.

Plus the fact that you can click on the developer and publisher and that opens a whole new menu is not made clear because the UI all bleeds together.
Plus the layout of the genres look cluttered as fuck (showing where it ranks is obnoxious and will effect ratings) plus video game genres should feature more division (shit like "side-scrolling", "third person" and "third person" should be put into a "Perspective" category as they don't denote tone/narrative like traditional genres such as "War" or "Fantasy").

Glitchwave is a complete mess as to be expected of an open beta.

Much worse there is literally no discussion of it on /v/ or /vg/ so I can imagine the site isn't making any waves in the vidya community.

>>74056953
rateyourart would be interesting, with all the sites connected we'd see a direct correlation between those who rate baroque 10/10 and those who listen to the smiths.

>>74053799
Its shit, it didn't import a lot of my music collection from my profile.

>oldest comments at the top
The site would be a lot better if it wasn't made by retards.

I like the music recommendations on release pages.

>>74061236
>Much worse there is literally no discussion of it on /v/ or /vg/ so I can imagine the site isn't making any waves in the vidya community.
Good. /v/, /vg/, and the vidya community are fucking cancer. The only reason the game charts are half decent is because of this.

Site looks a lot better at 80% zoom.

I love being able to search secondary genres again.

>>74061504
How do you search secondary? Do you have to be signed up?

>>74061563
I'm not sure if you have to be signed up, but there's a build chart function the left of the charts page.

From there you can filter by influences, which is the secondary genre.

>>74061588
Thanks.

Welp, got a 500 error. I guess my taste in genres are either too shit, or too patrician.

>>74061443
Oh I 100% agree but without any kind of community glitchwave will die a death, it can't survive solely on music fans who also happen to like video games.

And I hope you mean the half decent are the half that rates GTA:SA higher than GTA:V not the half that rates GTA:V higher than GTA:IV.

>>74061689
You get that error for some genres it seems. Progressive Rock doesn't work, but Avant-Prog does, for example.

>>74061698
>Oh I 100% agree but without any kind of community glitchwave will die a death, it can't survive solely on music fans who also happen to like video games.
Except it can, and it's doing pretty well at that.

>And I hope you mean the half decent are the half that rates GTA:SA higher than GTA:V not the half that rates GTA:V higher than GTA:IV
I mean the half decent half that doesn't rate GTA.

>>74061504
Definitely looks better zoomed out. Looks really promising, but right now it's a bit cluttered and some features like "Want to listen to" are completely useless. I can't seem to find a way to look at just the albums listed as want to listen, they only seem to be put into the recents.

are you allowed to write reviews on the glitchwave beta yet? I logged a few ratings for some games and I went to review one but I got a 500 error.

game was Mother 3 if that makes a difference.

The recent releases section is actually usable now.

>>74061758
name a better on-going game franchise than grand theft auto that doesn't have Souls in the name and I will respond with a condescending anime reaction image

>>74061964
I just tried reviewing arkham aslum and got the same, I don't know where the current reviews came from but it seems that feature isn't functioning yet

>>74062026
yeah it still isn't working for me, went and tried it on another game (golden sun). I think those old reviews were from the earlier betas

>>74062012
Mario
Civilization
Wolfenstein
Ace Combat
Trails of Steel

L
U
N
C
H

Are sign ups not implemented yet? Gets stuck if I try to create an account

>>74062130
As far as I can see there's no benefit to signing up during the beta.

>>74062012
>on-going game franchise
lol
Go back to /v/, /vg/, or whichever other cancerous video game community you came from

>>74061964
You could in the pre-beta.

>game was Mother 3 if that makes a difference.
Don't bother then.

>>74056953
This

File: 1477947954461.jpg (45KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x374px

>>74062012
>on-going game franchise
>souls

So why should I use this over rym? Is this replacing rym? When are they going to make a rym for games?

>>74062186
>>on-going game franchise
If you honestly don't think there are any good modern game franchises you have proven my point about how little crossover there is between music fans and video game fans.

Plus I never browse.

Honestly thought I'd filtered you already but thanks for reminding me

>>74062242
video game fans =/= cancerigenous video game communities

I'm sorry you are part of the latter.

>>74062241
>Is this replacing rym?
It will, eventually.
>When are they going to make a rym for games?
They already have. Glitchwave.

can you guys stop being assholes about the site

>>74062308
This.

I think I'm in love with it. Not sure what the argument against it is apart from "everything different is bad".

>>74062308
>>74062385
I actually read somewhere that something will definitely improve if it receives no feedback and everyone just pretends to like it

>>74054749
Looks great on mobile though.

>>74062394
Oh, yeah. This thread is filled with constructive criticism.

>>74062445
Perhaps read past the initial angry reactions and read why people don't like it or people reporting bugs. Your website wont get any better if you ignore the reason people hate it.

>>74062445
That's because it makes no sense to post constructive criticism. All of the people who are giving it are doing on the RYM forums.

>>74062466
post constructive criticism here*

>>74054956
You have autism

>>74058311
This is the most cancerous marxist shit I've ever read in my life

>Albums Recommendations
>Connecting to Spotify
>Generate Playlist

forget about design, there are fucking awesome features here.

>>74062605
they've always had album recommendations, it's the sole reason I used rym

I'm just using the genres tab and finding a bunch of shit that I've never heard of under the "recommended" section. Pretty neat.

>>74062649
i meant album suggestions in the release page

>>74062605
>Connecting to Spotify
so, we've got scrobbling now?

>>74062760
It was there. It was just a subscriber feature.

>>74062838
And now it's [apparently] free. Also the album recommendation appears to be better, at least in my experience. Before I'd always see albums I'd either already rated or were on my radar, now I'm seeing albums that I've never seen before.

I still like the basic design of the old site better tb q h

I only use the site anymore for movies anymore and it looks better than the fucking nothing it was before.

Also the video game charts are pleb as fuck. Did /v/ vote on this or something lmao.

why can't i see my friends ratings on an album? why can't i make a chart from my friends top rated albums? why is everyones recent ratings from like 10 days ago? why are all the recent comments from like 10 days ago?

it doesnt let me make an account for some reason it just says loading and never goes anywhere

Someone tell me please, if I have had rym account long time ago, do I already have Cinemos and Glitchwave or do I have to make an account?

Also if I make an account now is it gonna get saved or am I gonna need to make it again?

>>74063747
>Also the video game charts are pleb as fuck.
yeah, how the fuck did mass effect 2 get in the top 100? that's like skrillex getting in the top 100 albums

>>74063934
Same.

File: monitor.jpg (56KB, 450x443px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 450x443px

>>74053799
Looks like shit.
Runs like shit.

There was nothing broken about RYM in the first place, so these "fixes" are a step back.

Webdevs are a plague.

>>74063747
Someone send a screenshot of the top 100 or whatever, I don't feel like signing up just for that.

>>74057242
Criticker, maybe?

>click on profile
>500 request error
>try another profile
>500 request error
>try another profile
>500 request error

>>74064446
not bothered going through all that. Here's the top 10

The top spot is..... NHL 17 (I don't even know. It only has 2 ratings so I won't count it)

1. Mother 3 (whatever)
2. Silent Hill 2 (probably the only one in the top 10 that deserves to be this high)
3. Dark Souls (complete meme game)
4. Earthbound (meh)
5. Chrono Trigger (not a fan)
6. Bloodborne (never played)
7. Super Mario World (3 is better)
8. Super Metroid (great game)
9.Witcher 3 (lol)
10. Majora's Mask (meh)

Looks like a /v/ list

>>74064557
>the top game of all time on glitchwave is a GBA game
i'm calling BS on that. fuck the GBA

I clicked on "Build chart" and excluded all catalogued, rated and wishlisted albums and then clicked "Create chart" yet nothing has changed from the default chart. Is this feature working?

>>74064557
You have a bad taste in games