[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

You! Post your favourite album of the 70s!

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 193
Thread images: 71

File: file.png (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
2MB, 2048x1536px
You!

Post your favourite album of the 70s!
>>
File: 747457445.jpg (145KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
747457445.jpg
145KB, 1000x1000px
>>
File: the-snork.png (65KB, 206x224px) Image search: [Google]
the-snork.png
65KB, 206x224px
1971 - 1980 or 1970 - 1979?
>>
File: 003d2080.jpg (359KB, 2032x1000px) Image search: [Google]
003d2080.jpg
359KB, 2032x1000px
GOAT
>>
File: Fragile.jpg (88KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Fragile.jpg
88KB, 300x300px
It's less about the music itself and more about how the album has always sort of been this thing that I could use to calm myself down during a panic attack.
>>
>>
>>74016453
If you're the kind of person who has to ask this question, I really don't want to know what your answer is.
>>
>>74016513
Wonderful choice. Such a gem.
>>
File: file.png (1MB, 953x953px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
1MB, 953x953px
>>
File: Station_to_Station_cover.jpg (69KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Station_to_Station_cover.jpg
69KB, 300x300px
>>74016089
>>
File: The_Cars_-_The_Cars.jpg (34KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
The_Cars_-_The_Cars.jpg
34KB, 300x300px
>>
File: brothers and sisters.jpg (18KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]
brothers and sisters.jpg
18KB, 226x223px
>>
another green world
>>
File: 220px-Thin_Lizzy_-_Jailbreak.jpg (29KB, 220x221px) Image search: [Google]
220px-Thin_Lizzy_-_Jailbreak.jpg
29KB, 220x221px
70 - Paranoid
71 - The Yes Album
72 - Pink Moon
73 - DSOTM
74 - Mirage
75 - Wish You Were Here
76 - Jailbreak
77 - Animals
78 - Long Live Rock 'n' Roll
79 - Inflammable Material

Pic related is my overall favourite. I apologise for nothing.
>>
Ready for the House or Plantasia
>>
>>74017030
>Jailbreak

My man, that's a fucking great album.
>>
File: Another_Green_World.jpg (33KB, 494x483px) Image search: [Google]
Another_Green_World.jpg
33KB, 494x483px
very basic choice but it still doesn't make it very beautiful
>>
>>74016783
>>74017453
I'm listening to this right now
>>
>>74017472
you're in for a tripĀ“
just listen it focused
>>
File: download (4).jpg (7KB, 171x171px) Image search: [Google]
download (4).jpg
7KB, 171x171px
This or marquee moon
>>
>>74016783
>>74017453
This.
Second place is Lorca or Flying Teapot
>>
File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (72KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault (1).jpg
72KB, 1280x720px
>>
Name a better album, I'll wait.

Good I'll grab some popcorn now
>>
>>74016496
I feel you anon
>>
File: Thick as a Brick.jpg (286KB, 1300x1300px) Image search: [Google]
Thick as a Brick.jpg
286KB, 1300x1300px
On this board? Too easy.
>>
>>74017715
Oh fuck, that's probably my favorite too
>>
File: Permanent Waves.jpg (484KB, 1912x1881px) Image search: [Google]
Permanent Waves.jpg
484KB, 1912x1881px
This came out January 1, 1980, but it was recorded throughout 1979
>>
>>74017919
This one is in my superior meh tier. Hemispheres and A Farewell to Kings are better imo
>>
File: IMG_7608.jpg (524KB, 3160x3160px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_7608.jpg
524KB, 3160x3160px
>>
File: Wish You Were Here.jpg (1MB, 1984x1984px) Image search: [Google]
Wish You Were Here.jpg
1MB, 1984x1984px
>>74016496
>>74017776
my niggas
>>
File: Mike Oldfield.jpg (8KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]
Mike Oldfield.jpg
8KB, 226x223px
>>74016089
>>
>>74017945
I don't know why, I've always held Permanent Waves as my favorite Rush album. It sometimes swaps with Hemispheres though depending on my mood.
>>
File: tago_mago_40.jpg(2).jpg (190KB, 798x800px) Image search: [Google]
tago_mago_40.jpg(2).jpg
190KB, 798x800px
>>
File: Van_Halen_album.jpg (17KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Van_Halen_album.jpg
17KB, 300x300px
>>74016089
>>
>>74018028
Side 1 is good but side 2 is kinda meh. Jacob's Ladder is one of my favorite Rush track though
>>
>>74018355
tracks*
>>
File: 1214bedspring.darkness-2.jpg (91KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]
1214bedspring.darkness-2.jpg
91KB, 600x602px
do y'all prefer this or born to run
i can't choose desu. jungleland/backstreets are two of his best songs but this one is just fucking fuming
>>
File: 81iqrcZUwqL._SL1089_.jpg (266KB, 1089x1064px) Image search: [Google]
81iqrcZUwqL._SL1089_.jpg
266KB, 1089x1064px
the 70s was a really bad decade for rock, even worse for electronic.
it was saved by the 1977-1979 period tho, the disco and post punk scene.
pic related my pick.
>>
File: Screenshot_20170719-112344.jpg (615KB, 1440x1450px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20170719-112344.jpg
615KB, 1440x1450px
Either this one or Queen II
>>
>>74018402
70's was the best decade for rock. What are you talking about?>>74018405
>>
>>74018402
>the 70s was a really bad decade for rock
I'd extend that to all of music
>>
>>74018402
Do you even music bro
Exact opposite
>>
File: Jethro Tull Songs from the Wood.jpg (51KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
Jethro Tull Songs from the Wood.jpg
51KB, 400x400px
"Favorites" are normally boring but here.
>>
>>74018355
I'm a big sucker for Entre Nous and Different Strings. But AFTK and Hemispheres are both near perfect albums.
>>
>>74018429
>>74018473
70s rock aged horribly, with only a few exceptions.
keep lying to yourself but you know that the so called classic rock or dad rock is pure garbage.
>>
File: ABBFillmore_East_Cover_1000.jpg (494KB, 1008x996px) Image search: [Google]
ABBFillmore_East_Cover_1000.jpg
494KB, 1008x996px
>>74016089
>bad decade for rock

Are you high on crack?
>>
>>74016513
Hell yeah
>>
File: cover.jpg (2MB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]
cover.jpg
2MB, 1600x1600px
>>
>>74016089
Cliche
But dark side of the moon
>>
>>74017945
Rush's best work was in the mid 80s. They suck as a prog band, but I love their rock/new wave stuff
>>
File: Low_(album).jpg (43KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Low_(album).jpg
43KB, 300x300px
>>
>>74018664
I think both are equally great. Hemispheres - Power Windows is a fantastic run
>>
>>74018607
>dad rock
I'm guessing you didn't want your argument to be taken seriously, good job on that.
>>
I've already found some good recs in this thread. Anyone know some great overlooked 70's albums?
>>
File: TommyBolinTeaser.jpg (110KB, 600x597px) Image search: [Google]
TommyBolinTeaser.jpg
110KB, 600x597px
>>74018796
overlooked underrated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTSaRE1vaGM
>>
>>74018796
earlier springsteen
check this song out, anon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioQcvijom28
>>
File: IMG_3265.jpg (33KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3265.jpg
33KB, 375x375px
>>74018796
If you want something different from rock, this is early new wave/techno
>>
>>74018843
>>74018847
>>74018849

Thanks, I'll give these all a listen tonight
>>
>>74018664
How many times are you going to post this incorrect opinion?
>>
File: 51-Pb5T+23L.jpg (54KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
51-Pb5T+23L.jpg
54KB, 500x500px
>>
File: the slider.jpg (304KB, 1094x1086px) Image search: [Google]
the slider.jpg
304KB, 1094x1086px
>>
Motƶrhead
>>
File: Hemispheres.jpg (80KB, 715x715px) Image search: [Google]
Hemispheres.jpg
80KB, 715x715px
>>74016089
>Hemispheres
>>
>>74017843
Firth of Fifth = one of best songs in progressive history
>>
>>74017919
>>74017945
>>74018571
Permanent Waves is a God Tier album but you guys forgot to mention the best song on there... Natural Science
>>
>>74019919
Well that goes without saying. It's my favorite song on the album. I was trying to defend the two "lessor" tracks.
>>
File: Folder.jpg (229KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]
Folder.jpg
229KB, 1200x1200px
Lots of people adore S2S and I do too, but I've always had a soft spot for this one
>>
>>74016496
pussy
>>
File: 61Ug-pa0R0L.jpg (113KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
61Ug-pa0R0L.jpg
113KB, 500x500px
>>
File: IMG_0254.jpg (205KB, 1000x990px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0254.jpg
205KB, 1000x990px
Either AGW or pic
>>
>>74016089
>listening to pre 2010's music

stick with your era.
>>
>>74019594
Until everyone agrees with me
>>
>>74020606
>stick with your era.


So...Beethoven is out?
>>
>>74020606
'70s music is objectively better.
>>
>>74020221
AGW?
>>
File: All Things Must Pass.jpg (222KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]
All Things Must Pass.jpg
222KB, 750x750px
>>
>>74019610
I prefer Electric Warrior but this is amazing too
>>
Not only my favourite, but objectively the best album of the '70s.
>>
File: 1611821.jpg (55KB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]
1611821.jpg
55KB, 260x260px
Henry Cow - In Praise of Learning
>>
>>74023290
>objectively the best album of the '70s.
Not even top 100 of the decade lol

>>74018402
worst decade was 80s though

>>74017843
Close to the Edge by Yes
>>
File: phil_collins_3x3.jpg (221KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]
phil_collins_3x3.jpg
221KB, 900x900px
>>74023371
>worst decade was 80s though
No
>>
>>74018843


thanks for this - was checking it out...saw this comment- holy shit

"Narada Michael Walden from Mahavishnu MK II, drums on track 7. Phil Collins, percussion on track 4, Jeff Porcaro drums on tracks 1, 2, 3 and 5. Prairie Prince from the Tubes and Todd Rundgren, drums on tracks 4 and 8. Jan Hammer from Mahavishnu MK I and Jeff Beck and Miami Vice (in the future), keyboards on tracks 6 & 7, also drums on track 6 ! David Sanborn, saxophone on tracks 6 & 7. Only having played so well with a musician of Billy Cobham's stature in the 1973 and then Alphonse Mouzon in 1974, could have possibly led this many great virtuoso musicians to want to play on Bolin's first solo album. They certainly weren't doing it strictly for the money, that's for sure."
>>
>>74023426
Not enough
>>
>>74023426
awful opinion if real
nice meme if not
>>
File: Ram.jpg (234KB, 384x379px) Image search: [Google]
Ram.jpg
234KB, 384x379px
1970 - Paul McCartney - McCartney
1971 - Paul McCartney - Ram
1972 - Big Star - #1 Record
1973 - Queen - Queen
1974 - Sparks - Kimono My House
1975 - Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here
1976 - Stevie Wonder - Songs In The Key of Life
1977 - Cheap Trick - Cheap Trick
1978 - The Police - Outlandos d'Amour
1979 - Wings - Back To The Egg

This was actually really difficult. Pic related is my favorite album of all time. The 70s are my favorite decade for music.
>followed by the 80s > 00s > 90s > 60s > 10s > 50s

>Excellent choices
>>74016620
>>74016638
>>74017715
>>74017776
>>74017919
>>74018004
>>74018354
>>74018721
>>74019599
>>74019820
>>74019976
>>74022968
>>
File: IMG_0565.jpg (39KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0565.jpg
39KB, 300x300px
>>
>>74023426
I love 80s music, but jesus is Phil Collins bad.
>>
File: file.png (400KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
400KB, 500x500px
>>
>>74023991

>back to the egg

Defend this.
>>
>>74024790
How do I defend a subjective opinion? I love every song on it. Getting Closer, Arrow Through Me, and Old Siam Sir are easily some of the best songs McCartney has put out. The whole album is pop rock bliss.
>>
>>74024844
I do too. It's an underrated album
>>
>>74024844

to my ears, it's one of the most dated albums of the entire 1970s and it came out at the tail end of the decade.

it's so backwards thinking compared to mccartney's solo work of the period and much more innovative music was coming out the same year
>>
>>74023991
Redditor get out!
>>
>>74024945
>dated

I've never understood this concept.
>>
>>74024961
I've been to reddit.com once just to see what it looked like. I've been posting here for longer than you have you retarded trip.
>>
>>74025019
>I've been posting here for longer than you have you retarded trip.
I have had this trip for longer than 3 months, you know?
>>
File: download (1).jpg (13KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
download (1).jpg
13KB, 225x225px
>>74018260
yeh boi
>>
File: Closetotheedge_yesalbum.jpg (102KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
Closetotheedge_yesalbum.jpg
102KB, 300x300px
>>74018402
>Bad decade for rock
>Wtf is prog?
>>
>>74025041
Malcolm X Wing was before you. I thought he was kind of cool. You're just a tool. Were you even here for Cardiacs, Gentile Giant, and Magma?
>>
>>74025872
>Malcolm X Wing was before you.
And you are not him.
>Were you even here for Cardiacs, Gentile Giant, and Magma?
Fucking lmao
I'm the reason that became a meme on first place lol
>>
>>74025280
>Bad decade for rock
>prog
yeah, i don't i'm mistaken
>>
File: rvlA0RL_d.jpg (98KB, 640x537px) Image search: [Google]
rvlA0RL_d.jpg
98KB, 640x537px
>>74025927
No, I've never had a trip. He was the only trip I've ever gotten along with consistently. You and I have even had it out in the past. I wish I could remember what that was about. I'm sure it had something to do with a Beatles related thread.

I named Dude Guy btw, if you remember that night. That was only a couple years ago.
>>
File: 666.jpg (12KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
666.jpg
12KB, 300x300px
Don't listen to much 70s stuff honestly but this shit's pretty great.
>>
>>74026083
Are you the Beatles tape-loop guy?
And no, I don't remember Dude Guy, I don't browse /mu/ every day. In fact, I just started browsing semi regularly after a year or so.
>>
>>74026235
No, I am the "When did you realize that Wings were better than the Beatles?" guy.
>>
>>74026286
Never heard of you.
Anyways, your taste is way too shitty, that's why I called you out on being here for 3 months.
Like, looking at your favorites by year wasn't enough, but your replies to what you thought were good albums it was a bunch of entry level plebeian mainstream garbage.
>>
>>74016620
This is the correct answer.
>>
>>74026395
Care to post your "superior" version? Just so you're pre-warned, if Can is on your list your opinion will be discarded.
>>
>>74026395
lol avant garde a clue is more like it
>>
>>74026709
Sure

1970: Black Sabbath - Paranoid
1971: Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin [IV]
1972: Premiata Forneria Marconi - Per un amico
1973: Todd Rundgren - A Wizard, A True Star
1974: Albert Marcœur - Albert Marcœur
1975: Henry Cow - In Praise of Learning
1976: Albert Marcœur - Album Ć  Colorier
1977: Chrome - Alien Soundtracks
1978: Willie ColĆ³n & RubĆ©n Blades - Siembra
1979: XTC - Drums and Wires

Now, Can are legitimately one of the greatest rock bands ever, even though I don't like them that much.

>>74026819
old joke
>>
>>74026966
>Zeppelin
>Rundgren
Jesus christ... And you think have room to judge my tastes?

>Can are legitimately one of the greatest rock bands ever, even though I don't like them that much.
So you're one of THOSE people.
>>
>>74026966
Sabbath and XTC are great choices though btw...

I'm listening to Henry Cow right now. I just don't understand how this isnt just considered "joke music."
>>
>>74027223
>And you think have room to judge my tastes?
Absolutely. Your taste is entry level as fuck. It's like your taste remained the same as when you first started browsing /mu/
Also, it's especially funny that you mentioned them because they are the bands you would like the most (I bet you haven't listened to that specific Rundgren album anyways lol).

>So you're one of THOSE people.
What's wrong?

>>74027245
>Sabbath and XTC are great choices though btw...
Yeah, and very entry level too. I mean, fucking Black Sabbath...

>I'm listening to Henry Cow right now. I just don't understand how this isnt just considered "joke music."
Holy shit, how can you even be so much of a pleb?
>>
>>74027486
>Entry level

Everything is entry level for something else, isn't it? Can you provide for me an "ulimate destination" album? I also sincerely doubt you've listened to more than half of my list.

Btw, I listened to a bunch of Todd Rundgren albums back in the day of anticipation for his work with The NEW Cars. He was pretty terrible. Not talent wise, he's a great singer and guitarist. He just totally lacks good songwriting skills (kind of like John Cougar and Bruce Springsteen).
>>
>>74027630
>Everything is entry level for something else, isn't it?
No. The point is when all your favorites are entry level albums (another word for the most popular albums).

And lmao at your opinion regarding Rundgren. He was one of the best pop artists ever, with great skills regarding audio. Listen to A Wizard, A True Star. All the instruments and mastering was done by him, and even more, he managed to fit more minutes into a vinyl than it was supposed possible, thanks to his technical skills in audio

>He just totally lacks good songwriting skills (like Bruce Springsteen)
fucking LOL
>>
File: cover.jpg (170KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
cover.jpg
170KB, 400x400px
>>74016089
ok
>>
>>74027712
Please point out which of my picks are the most popular with the respective artist. I'm having a hard time

>Paul McCartney - Did I say Band On The Run?
>Big Star - (they're popular at all) If you think they are, you need to get out of the house.
>Queen - (s/t debut) Certainly not ANY of their other 70s albums.
>Sparks - Kimono My House
Ok, but not even my favorite Sparks album, and not even a popular artist. Like Big Star, what normal person has heard of Sparks?

1975 - Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here
>Do I even need to?
1976 - Stevie Wonder - Songs In The Key of Life
Fine. You got me here.
1977 - Cheap Trick - Cheap Trick
>again
1978 - The Police - Outlandos d'Amour
>again
1979 - Wings - Back To The Egg
>point made?
>>
>>74027766
wat dis?
>>
1970: Desertshore or Starsailor
1971: Faust or Tago Mago
1972: In Den Gaerten Pharaos or Pink Moon
1973: Neu! 2 or Leg End
1974: Rock Bottom
1975: Tonight's The Night or Another Green World
1976: Radio Ethiopia or Ramones
1977: Suicide or Second Annual Report
1978: The Modern Dance or Are We Not Men
1979: Y or Metal Box or 154
>>
File: 1481722631276.png (13KB, 451x384px) Image search: [Google]
1481722631276.png
13KB, 451x384px
>>74028012
>tfw to intelligent to use google reverse image search
>>
>>74018607
holy shit, what a monumental fag
>>
>>74018260
this
>>
File: FFV.jpg (210KB, 599x620px) Image search: [Google]
FFV.jpg
210KB, 599x620px
This, Exuma, and The Kick Inside
>>
>>74026966
>1977: Chrome - Alien Soundtracks
fuck yes
>>
>>74027865
holy shit lol
I meant most popular albums, not most popular album by each artists lol

All of the artists you posted are entry level, and for obvious reasons, their albums are going to be entry level as well

>Ok, but not even my favorite Sparks album, and not even a popular artist. Like Big Star, what normal person has heard of Sparks?
How fucking deluded and ignorant are you?
>Sparks are best known for the songs "This Town Ain't Big Enough for Both of Us", which reached No. 2 on the UK Singles Chart in 1974; the disco hit "The Number One Song in Heaven" in 1979; "When I'm With You" which topped the French Singles Chart in 1980; the single "I Predict", which provided Sparks' first appearance on the Billboard Hot 100, reaching No. 60 in May 1982; the 1983 single "Cool Places" with the Go-Go's rhythm guitarist and backing vocalist Jane Wiedlin, and "When Do I Get to Sing 'My Way'" which topped the German and European charts in 1994/95 and was the top airplay record in Germany for 1994.

Today I learned that chart topping bands are not popular lol
>>
File: Sans titre.png (537KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Sans titre.png
537KB, 1000x1000px
My favorite prog-folk album
>>
File: 220px-Big_Star_-1_Record.jpg (13KB, 220x224px) Image search: [Google]
220px-Big_Star_-1_Record.jpg
13KB, 220x224px
>>74023991
my nig
>>
>>74018614
>>bad decade for rock
no one said that, you spastic
>>
>>74022246
Another Green World
>>
File: 1497588951013.png (2MB, 1023x682px) Image search: [Google]
1497588951013.png
2MB, 1023x682px
>>74028379
>>
>>74028366
You really like throwing out the term "entry level" a lot, don't you? Good thing too because it's not like you've been able to form an actual argument yet. Almost like your reasoning skills are entry level.
>>
File: 51gvoVZz8hL.jpg (40KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
51gvoVZz8hL.jpg
40KB, 500x500px
>>
>>74028366
Hi there!
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!
Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!
>>
>>74028450
>You really like throwing out the term "entry level" a lot, don't you?
Yeah, because that has been the point of the whole discussion, retard.
>Good thing too because it's not like you've been able to form an actual argument yet.
But I have. I demonstrated that your taste in music is entry level as fuck.
>Almost like your reasoning skills are entry level.
Said the guy who called a chart topping band not popular LMAO
>>
>>74028669
>a chart topping band from 1982 is even in the realm of known, popular, or relevent in current year

>I demonstrated that your taste in music is entry level as fuck.
No you didn't. Where?

>"IT'S ENRTY LEVEL BECAUSE IT'S ENTRY LEVEL AND ENTRY LEVEL IS BAD." (Without properly explaining what "entry level" even is and how it pertains to any of my picks.)
-your whole argument so far
>>
File: 1478316027398.jpg (30KB, 500x587px) Image search: [Google]
1478316027398.jpg
30KB, 500x587px
>why yes, i do use a tripcode on 4chan
>>
>>74028771
>a chart topping band from 1982 is even in the realm of known, popular, or relevent in current year
Actually, yes. You are just too ignorant to know better.

>No you didn't. Where?
When you used Sparks as an example of an artists that wasn't popular but actually is, meaning everything else is popular too.

>your whole argument so far
If you can't read, maybe.
>>
File: 81vbWlaEupL._SL1300_.jpg (403KB, 1300x1300px) Image search: [Google]
81vbWlaEupL._SL1300_.jpg
403KB, 1300x1300px
Hard to just pick one favourite. There are many great 70's albums.
Hawkwind - Space Ritual
The Pop Group - Y
Neu! - Neu!
Can - Tago Mago
The Stooges - Raw Power
Television - Marquee Moon
Various Artists - No New York
Gang of Four - Entertainment
>>
>>74028867
>Actually, yes. You are just too ignorant to know better.
Explain.

>When you used Sparks as an example of an artists that wasn't popular but actually is, meaning everything else is popular too.
Even if Sparks was the most popular musical artist of all time, how does that make them bad?

>If you can't read, maybe.
Ouch. How do you craft such imperious arguments that no one ever challenges you and your infinite wisdom?
>>
>>74028963
>Explain.
Spark are not unpopular, they are still popular even to this day.

>Even if Sparks was the most popular musical artist of all time, how does that make them bad?
It doesn't. But when your entire taste consists of entry level artists, then your taste sucks.

>How do you craft such imperious arguments that no one ever challenges you and your infinite wisdom?
I won't bother replying to your shitposting.
>>
>>74023991
70 - Black Sabbath - s/t
71 - Comus - First Utterance (best year)
72 - Yes - Close to the Edge
73 - Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
74 - King Crimson - Red
75 - Pink Floyd - Wish You Were Here
76 - Songs in the Key of Life - Stevie Wonder (worst year)
77- The Alan Parsons Project - I Robot
78 - Kraftwerk - The Man-Machine
79 - The Clash - London Calling
>>
File: nƩvtelen.jpg (38KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
nƩvtelen.jpg
38KB, 400x400px
Please recommend me more albums like Metro's 1977 self titled album.
>>
>>74017843
How gay would you have to be to like this
>>
File: Paul McCartney.jpg (48KB, 404x480px) Image search: [Google]
Paul McCartney.jpg
48KB, 404x480px
>>74029017
>Spark are not unpopular, they are still popular even to this day.
Yes, many things (including high school biology text books from the 50s, diesel locomotives produced by ALCO and EMD in the 60s, and the 80s television show "Square Pegs") are popular in limited circles. That does not make them generally popular in any way, shape, or form in 2017. You really do need to leave the house and interact with people in the real world once in a while.

>But when your entire taste consists of entry level artists, then your taste sucks.
Again without explaining what is bad about a single artist that I listed.

>I won't bother replying to your shitposting.
Beta as fuck, and also...

>BOTHERING POSTING ON /MU/ AT ALL WITHOUT MAKING A SINGLE FUCKING REASONABLE POINT
>>
>>74029200
Sparks are popular for anyone who listens to music beyond the radio (and at times not even that).
They are still popular, even to this day, just like Queen or Led Zeppelin are still popular.

>Again without explaining what is bad about a single artist that I listed.
Because I'm not saying those artists are bad, I'm saying your taste in music is bad.

>imagine being this triggered
holy shit lol
>>
>>74029227
Queen and Zeppelin are two of the 10 best selling musical artists of all time. Sparks are not even in the top 300.

>I'm saying your taste in music is bad.
How? Without saying "Entry level".
>>
>>74029266
Alright then, just take a look at the number of listeners Sparks have compared to Gentle Giant at lastfm.
They have more fans than Gentle Giant, and they are not an unpopular band by any means.

>How? Without saying why it's bad
Gee, I don't know!
>>
>>74029292
How is last.fm relevant to this? Explain how my taste is bad.
>>
>>74029301
Because lastfm is a good indicator of popularity.

Your taste is bad because it's entry level. Do I have to repeat it fives times more again?
>>
>>74029316
>Because lastfm is a good indicator of popularity.
Actually a total fallacy.

>Do I have to repeat it fives times more again?
Seems to be your method to making an argument against something. Maybe it'll work in your next post.
>>
>>74029343
>Actually a total fallacy.
what the fuck is wrong with you...
do you even know what lastfm is?
god, you really are a retard...

>Seems to be your method to making an argument against something. Maybe it'll work in your next post.
No, that has been the point of the discussion all along.
>>
>>74029358
>I'm saying your taste in music is bad.
How? Without saying "Entry level".
>>
>>74029370
It's bad because you listen to popular stuff almost exclusively.
>>
>>74029381
How is that bad? Without saying "Entry level".

This argument is like pulling goddamn teeth.
>>
>>74029405
It's bad because you don't listen to stuff that's not popular.
>>
>>74029413
That's not even sort of true. You're basing your assumptions on a very small sample size. So what if those are my favorites. Explain how a single one of them is not good.
>>
>>74029449
>That's not even sort of true
It definitely is.
>You're basing your assumptions on a very small sample size.
The sample size is big enough. If you listened to stuff that wasn't so highly popular at least one of the albums you mentioned would have been so. But none of them were, so...
>So what if those are my favorites.
It only means your taste is bad.
>Explain how a single one of them is not good.
I don't have to. Your taste is bad regardless if those albums are good or not.
>>
File: IMG_5691.jpg (24KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5691.jpg
24KB, 300x300px
>>74016089
>>
>>74018386
I think Born to Run is objectively the better album but so much of it is so overplayed I find myself choosing this one more often as well
>>
>>74029481
You wouldn't make a very good scientist or philosopher. You like jumping to objective conclusions too much.
>>
>>74019610
Best in thread
>>
>>74029562
Said the guy who can't come up with a single argument against what I have said lol
>>
>>74029578
I have no argument. I like the albums that I listed. You're the one who came in with a problem you can't explain.
>>
>>74029589
I only said your taste was entry level (which is true), and then you got all angry about it (again, because it's true). So, what's the deal with you?
>>
File: elle-mexico-june-2011.jpg (63KB, 595x897px) Image search: [Google]
elle-mexico-june-2011.jpg
63KB, 595x897px
Rate my taste. ;)

1970: The Stooges - Funhouse
1971: Serge Gainsbourg - Histoire de Melody Nelson
1972: Roxy Music - Roxy Music
1973: New York Dolls - New York Dolls
1974:Brian Eno - Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)
1975: Parliament - Mothership Connection
1976: Alain Kan - Heureusement en France, on ne se drogue pas
1977: T. Rex - Dandy in the Underworld
1978 Japan - Adolescent Sex
1979 Gang of Four - Entertainment!
>>
>>74029609
You haven't explained what entry level even means yet. What it is, why it's bad? How your taste is superior? What the process is to not be entry level? Is there a level before entry level, because like I've explained up until npw, there certainly are more popular 70s artists out there, like say Led Zeppelin or Black Sabbath.
>>
>>74029665
>You haven't explained what entry level even means yet.
I have, like 5 times already. It means popular stuff.

>why it's bad?
It's bad because it means you don't listen to stuff that's not popular.

>How your taste is superior?
Irrelevant. I'm only saying your taste is entry-level. My taste has nothing to do with that.

>What the process is to not be entry level?
To listen to stuff that's not popular.

>Is there a level before entry level, because like I've explained up until npw, there certainly are more popular 70s artists out there, like say Led Zeppelin or Black Sabbath.
Just because artist A is more popular than artists B doesn't mean B is not a popular artist either.
>>
>>74029707
>popular stuff.
Jesus fuck. EXPLAIN WHY IT'S BAD
>>
File: IMG_3321.png (215KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3321.png
215KB, 300x300px
Almost too much of a classic
>>
>>74029731
Because you listen to popular stuff exclusively.
You don't listen to stuff that's not popular.
What's so difficult to understand about that?
>>
>>74029513
Good call
>>
>>74029748
>Because you listen to popular stuff exclusively.
I don't. Not exclusively. I listed my favorites. They're bad. Why?
>>
>>74029622
Highly patrician
>>
>>74029777
Almost exclusively. Your choices (both by year and the ones you called "excellent") reflect this perfectly well. Every single one of your choices was a popular album. No exceptions.
It's not the recordings that are bad, it's your taste, because you don't listen to stuff that's not popular.
>>
File: band-on-the-run.jpg (64KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
band-on-the-run.jpg
64KB, 600x600px
>>74023991
>McCartney
>Big Star
>Cheap Trick

My dude
>>
>>74029815
So what you're trying to say is my tastes are being rated by your own autistic standards and not reflecting on the opinions of anyone else?

Cool.
>>
>>74029860
I'm saying your taste sucks because you don't listen to stuff that's not popular.
>>
>>74029879
Again, based on sheer autism. Thanks man, you've given me another reason to never adopt a trip. I'd hate to have to live with my posts. The internet remembers.
>>
We've gotta do this thread again with other decades. Found a lot of cool stuff in here.
>>
>>74029906
My "autism" has nothing to do with your taste being entry level.

>you've given me another reason to never adopt a trip
thank god!
>>
pinga pinga moon
>>
File: giphy.gif (528KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
giphy.gif
528KB, 480x270px
>>74029932
"Popular = bad"
-Avant-Math God of /mu/
>>
>>74029966
Popular can be good.
Exclusively listening to popular stuff is certainly not good.
>>
File: images.jpg (15KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
15KB, 225x225px
one of the best albums from the 70s
>>
>>
1973: Cockney Rebel: The Human Menagerie
>>
File: MI0002886468.jpg (60KB, 500x454px) Image search: [Google]
MI0002886468.jpg
60KB, 500x454px
Is there a better reggae album than this from the 70s?
>>
File: Van Halen II.jpg (26KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
Van Halen II.jpg
26KB, 600x600px
>>
>>74030306
At least six
>>
>>74030393
name them
>>
>>74016496
>panic attack
Please don't ruin the album for me with your triggered, social anxiety tumblr-diarrhea anon.
>>
File: budokan.jpg (33KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
budokan.jpg
33KB, 500x500px
>>74023991
>ctrl f Cheap Trick
>1 result

Plebs will be plebs
Thread posts: 193
Thread images: 71


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.