[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

ITT: audiophiles tell me if I'm a dipshit. So yesterday

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 65
Thread images: 10

File: IMG_1981.jpg (96KB, 1024x854px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1981.jpg
96KB, 1024x854px
ITT: audiophiles tell me if I'm a dipshit.

So yesterday I purchased a pair of Symphonized Wraith 2.0 Bluetooth Genuine walnut Wood Wireless Headphones with 3.5mm Cable Included for Wired Use, did I make a good decision?
>>
File: IMG_1983.jpg (79KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1983.jpg
79KB, 1280x720px
Previously I used these.
>>
>>74004630
you're a dipshit
>>
>>74004746
Elaborate please.
>>
>>74004756
how much did you pay for them and what are you using them for (home, portable, etc)?
>>
>>74004814
I paid $75 for the headsets plus $10.34 for a 4 year warranty. I will be using them for every time I need a pair of headphones.
>>
>>74004630
You are horrible at buying things and you're on the wrong board. Truly an irredeemable dipshit.
>>
>>74004914
Please explain.
>>
>>74004854
>I paid $75 for the headsets plus $10.34 for a 4 year warranty
In that case you should have just gotten SHP9500s or HD558s for home use. M40x and MDRs would probably be better and they're portable
>>
>>74004989
Why though?
>>
>>74005018
Cuz ur baiting. Remember to sage.
>>
>>74005083
I honestly don't know if I made a good decision I know jack shit about headphones.
>>
>>74005126
YOU DIDN'T
take them back to the store and get some AKG K240 or MDR-7506 or ATH M40x or Beats EP or something.
>>
>>74005179
WHY THOUGH??? Why is this intrinsically a bad decision? What inherently makes those better?
>>
>>74005227
You know what actually those headphones are fine.
>>
>>74005266
Ok? But what makes them fine?
>>
>>74005227
THEY HEADPHOBES WE LISTED ARE MORE COMFIER AND SOUND BETER THAT IS IT YOU CAN'T KNOW UNLESS YOU TRY BETTER ONES

IGNORANCE IS BLISS
>>
>>74005347
Stop replying you fucking sperg.
>>
>>74005347
Post pictures of the other ones if they are so comfy.
>>
>Buys headphones and asks for opinion
>gets opinion and gets told they're wrong
>desperately defends their purchase instead of doing anything
>>
>>74005179
Ok so I finally looked through those I hate beats and Sony so MDR-7506's and Beats EP's are out I find the style of ATH M40x's uncomfortable in general and generally have sound quality's I don't like. AKG K240's are more my style but the speaker sits to close to my ears for what I like.
>>
>>74005911
I was hoping I would be hearing more technical talk rather than
>these ones are comfier
All this thread has done is make me more confident my purchase was good.
>>
>>74006008
Then you have to spend more money.
>>
>>74006051
Ok... I never said that wasn't a problem.
>>
>>74006042
LIKE I SAID YOU ARE ON THE WRONG FUCKING BOARD
>>
>>74006109
Then what board should I go to for talking about listening to music?
>>
>>74006137
/r/headphones you stupid shit.
>>
>>74006498
Wow you are cancer. Leave 4chan forever please.
>>
File: earbud.jpg (39KB, 777x525px)
earbud.jpg
39KB, 777x525px
I personally am not a fan of headphones. These are similar to the ones I use when listening to most if not all my music.
>>
>>74006619
Symphonized makes wooden ear buds you should give them a try if they don't cost to much then report back to here
>>>/mu/
>>
>>74006548
Why should I. You're the faggot making dumbass threads because you don't know how to navigate the website.
>>
>>74006681
I only use beats earbuds thank you, I am not some peasant.
>>
>>74006722
>implying reasonable people use Reddit.
>>
>>74006797
Beats are trash.
>>
>>74006989
How? From my experience they are by far the greatest in both comfort and sound goodness.
>>
>>74007064
Comfort is subjective but the quality is really bad with beats you pay for the brand not the quality they are made using the same equipment you'd find in the headsets at a public library. Agreeably they are more comfortable.
>>
File: 20170114_092208.jpg (684KB, 2048x1152px)
20170114_092208.jpg
684KB, 2048x1152px
>>74005429
OKEE DOKEE
>>
>>74007237
I don't think that design is comfy.
>>
>>74004630
I've had the very same headphones for about 4 months

I love them
By far my favorite headphones ive ever owned

I don't have much to compare them too aside from cheap Sony headphones

So make of that what you will

The quality is excellent however
And they are very durable

My only complaint is they start to hurt my ears (like on my head, not audio wise) after 2+ hours of use
>>
>>74007344
That was what I was afraid they might do but apart from that I'm excited to try them out.
>>
>>74004710
bad
>>
>>74007304
It's surprisingly good as the band sits on your head and auto adjusts via the cables over the band. I have rather big ears and the cups fit fine. I also have a pair of K702's that while even larger are as equally comfortable. The earpads on the Sony's are uncomfortable .
>>
>>74007461
How close does the speaker sit to your ear. personally I like some distance and these look like they'd sit fairly close.
>>
>>74007459
They weren't as bad as you'd expect but yeah I'm looking for something more music oriented.
>>
>>74007514
702's sit away. 240's are closer but still circumaural. The ones in OP are on ear not over ear.

From Amazon

On ear or over the ear?
Answer:
I was a bit disappointed when these arrived, as I was expecting over/around-the-ear (circumaural) headphones that were fairly well lauded for their passive noise isolation properties. They are much smaller "in person" than they appear in the photos and are most definitely NOT circumaural cans.
>>
>>74007644
Yeah I saw that.
>>
>>74007644
702's are ~$200 though I don't have that kind of money at the moment.
>>
I have a pair and they hold up SO well. I've stepped on them, thrown them, laid on them, everything imaginable. The sound quality has not changed a bit and I love them. Aside from looking kinda ugly, they're great.
>>
>>74007710
I think they look neato but still good to hear.
>>
>>74007810
dipshit
>>
File: 1404643616428.png (280KB, 1276x1417px)
1404643616428.png
280KB, 1276x1417px
>>
>>74008847

This is now a filename thread
>>
Found this on sale at a store on vacation. How'd I do, /mu/?
>>
File: 1470031290626.png (257KB, 337x367px)
1470031290626.png
257KB, 337x367px
>>74009938

You could definitely have got a better used retro turntable for whatever you paid for the LP60. As a pretty reliable rule of thumb, any turntable with a manlet tonearm and no counter weight should stay away from your vinyl.

As for the headphones they're sealed on-ears which means the comfort is basically guaranteed to be garbage. I have no comment on its SQ.
>>
>>74009898
In this day and age of the information given by the internet, do people still fall for the wires meme?
>>
>>74010021
>no counter weight
shit. wasn't thinking.
Eh. still better than my dad's old one.. because it needs a new motor.

I mainly looked at the brand and some vinyl geek friends I know have an Audio Technica.
>>
>>74010276

The LP120 is the good one, though it's much more expensive than the 60. I mean, it's better than a Crosley or any of those stupid portable suitcase record players but I'd honestly recommend getting rid of it and saving up for something proper.

It just doesn't make sense to buy a cheap turntable when vinyl itself is expensive.
>>
>>74010427
my parents got me a Charlie Brown Crosley one Christmas because they thought it was cute
>>
>>74006950
>OP is a reasonable person
>>
>>74004630
You burnt your money away faggot. As if you didn't already burnit from fagzer headset. You piece of garbage. Blow it out your ass.
>>
>>74010525
I bet it wasn't cute the moment you put a record on it and played it.
>>
>>74009938
You done goofed.
>>
>>74010628
I have designated it for clearance bin used records.
>>
>>74011066
Fair enough.
>>
>>74010642
Uh oh. Should I backtrace it?
Thread posts: 65
Thread images: 10


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.