Why do you hate Royal Blood, /mu/?

>>73963593
They are too bland to be hated, it's music made to appeal by design, they are an industry plant.
But the first album still ad a few legitimately good songs in it. The second one doesn't.

/mu/ hates everything that's even remotely popular and the bitch about the industry like the faggot above me

>>73963797
I just said that I don't hate them. Work on that reading comprehension my friend.

>>73963819
You still bitched about some industry plant though

>>73963765
>The second one doesn't.
Sleep is good!

Just ignore the cringy lyrics

>>73963830
But they are. That doesn't mean they can't make good music, but they have 0 control over what music they make.
>>73963850
>Just ignore the cringy lyrics
can't do, won't do

>>73963878
sure and bush did 9/11

>>73963957
I mean, he clearly did but why are you changing the subject?

File: 1481724741967.jpg (56KB, 453x439px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 453x439px

>>73963765
>he listened to both their albums
nigga why?

>>73963797
>/mu/ hates everything that's even remotely popular
yes, cause Radiohead and David Bowie are super obscure

>>73963593

they look like douchebags and they're industry plants that are meant to replace QOTSA and Foo Fighters once Homme and Grohl retire. Not gonna work, jews. Royal Blood suck royal dick.

>>73963977
I like to hurt myself. I even bought the first album for 3€ !

>>73963593
I like them not every band has to do something innovative and new. I don't care if they're a plant as long as they bring rock back somewhat. I'd rather have rock music be listened too by everyone than pop