ITT: shit bands with one good album

Can someone explain how this album is even good?

>inb4 muh cultural relevance

What

>>73919428
It's not great, but it'd say it's good. It definitely pales in comparison to a lot of other first-wave punk albums, but there are a decent amount of good tracks on there, the only one I can think of as being outstandingly shit being Anarchy in the UK maybe. It's a simple and enjoyable rock album.

>>73919482
Are you fucking kidding? Anarchy is a great track. The only mediocre song on this album is Submission.

>>73919428
It's fun and quotable
>SHE DOESN'T WANT A BABY WHO LOOKS LIKE THAT!

>>73920377
None of the songs are that good. They're are way better punk bands from the same year.