Is Grimes good, /mu/?

What do you think?

>>73905182
Absolutely. "Grimes is bad" is just a meme devoid of substance. An empty shell of a meme.

yeah she's solid. like 6 or 7 out of ten

she a good girl with pure royal slavic blood that can be traced back go peter the great

>>73905617
haha nigga what

>>73905182
Is gRiMeS gOoD /mU/?

>>73905644
Its true look it up her ancestors are from russia but had to change their name to boucher because of the plebian uprising communists revolutions to escape prosecution

pain

>>73905617
I hope she sleep well

>>73905182

kid's music, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

>>73905531
"Grimes is good" is just a meme devoid of substance. An empty shell of a meme.

>>73905182
She used to be. Long ago...

>>73905617
>>73905703
FYI she's part native American.

>>73906421
Lol

>>73905182
no

>>73906421
This, I remember when Art Angels came out two years ago and majority of this board thought it was a really good pop album and then /grimes/ general happened...

How do i get in to grimes?
Start from the beginning?

>>73907991
I remember hearing Scream on youtube and liking it, and then fantano completely trashing her

I think what resonated with me about that is how foggy and mentally ill it sounded, like kill v. maim has a very dysphoric feel to it

>>73908042
>fantano completely trashing her
>7/10

>>73908107
New fag

>>73906283
Wrong.
>>73908042
He gave Art Angels a 7. Not too bad.

File: 1468789249082.jpg (36KB, 400x267px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x267px

>>73905182
She is the best (artist of this decade)

File: 1476324976840.png (794KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

794KB, 3000x3000px

>>73908017
Try to use this flowchart.

>>73909528
>flowchart for an artist with five releases
peak degeneracy

File: 1472036992758.jpg (634KB, 1032x1776px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1032x1776px

>>73905577
objectively wrong

>>73909547
that's still a lot of music to pick from

>>73905577
just your subjective mediocre rating. that's not a solid rating.

>>73909291
>Wrong.
Wrong.

>>73907991
Grimes is still great. She never did a bad album so far and her next album will have an even bigger impact. Screencap this.

>>73909998
>she never did a bad album so far
See
>Geidi Primes
>Darkbloom
>Visions
>Art Angels

>>73910035
>See
>Geidi Primes
>Darkbloom
>Visions
>Art Angels
All of these are masterpieces. You just don't like them. Maybe you're a pleb? Who knows.

>>73910232
>all of these are masterpieces
kek

>You just don't like them
Wow, you're a smart one. Hope that you know that you "just like them"

>Maybe you're a pleb
I love how you think that anyone can be a pleb because they don't like shitty pop

>Who knows
Nobody but me, which is why you shouldn't state bullshit

Shit and ugly. Its a fact anon

>>73905182
the short answer is no

the long answer is that she lacks musical talent and uses instruments as accessorys so she can look cool.

Give grimes your blood

>>73909441
this is the most uninformed opinion i've ever seen.

>>73910460
this. grimes = image///////////////////////////////////music

>>73910460
This shit faggot ugly girl only love faggots anon. Shame on him

>>73909579
DELID DIS
>>73909528
>pop
That's not for true patricians.

>>73905531
grimes is bad

>>73911313
I was like you till invested in non lowfi sound system. You can tell whatever but bad.

>>73911441
the only thing grimes is good at, is making me want to fap

File: AaOvyiGf.jpg (30KB, 634x250px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 634x250px

>>73910275
Conclusion: you're a pleb. A big one. Deal with it.
>>73910460
Really? Her music is very well made and melodic. She has more talent in her middle finger than the whole /mu/ put together.

>>73910824
Wait a second: didn't you autists call her ugly? Make up your mind: what is her selling point, her music or her looks?

File: 1499940635504.jpg (139KB, 896x596px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 896x596px

>>73911888
APOLOGIZE TO GRIMES!

my only friend

>>73909528
>>73909547
Lol I made it. Part of the reason was to subtly make fun of people who think they need "flowcharts" to listen to music.

>>73905182
long answer: decide for yourself cuck
short: no

>>73912062
>Conclusion: you're a pleb
Please see the third point of >>73910275 and make sure you read it this time.

>>73912248
brb gonna go fap

>>73914326
Your point has a major flaw: her music is not shitty pop. Sorry, but your whole contruction fell like a house of cards.

>>73914653
>her music is not shitty pop
Well, it's pop and it's shitty, so I think it falls under that definition. Even if it wasn't shitty (that point is subjective), then it still wouldn't be patrician (and therefore you can't be a pleb for disliking it) because it's pop

grimes

Sufficient for pop, but either doesn't have curves or won't show em. Yep, that matters. You could've done rock and remained modest, Claire. As it is, it's skin time.

>>73905182
she is certainly a good girl

>>73912101
>what is her selling point, her music or her looks?
her looks obviously. not because she's attractive. because she dresses like a hipster adolescent and she has a recognizable visual aesthetic that appeals to adolescents.

>>73914685
>implying it can't be patrician because it's pop
Are these artists plebs or not: Kate Bush, Laurie Anderson, Roxy Music, David Bowie, Prince, Peter Gabriel, Bjork, Elizabeth Fraser?

>>73915920
>her looks obviously
Wait a fucking minute: then why /mu/ shout like autists that she's ugly literally every single day? If she's ugly then what's left is her music as the selling point.

>inb4 being ugly is a selling point

>>73916031
learn how to read before you respond to me you invertebrate

>>73905617
>>73905703
hope you're memeing and not actually this retarded. we White Canadians are a mixed breed

>>73915920
>not because she's attractive. because she dresses like a hipster adolescent and she has a recognizable visual aesthetic that appeals to adolescents
Do you realize that you contradicted yourself? If she wouldn't be attractive then her clothes and visual aesthetic would mean shit. And btw, she has many adult fans. She's almost 30, ffs.

>>73915973
pop is not a black and white descriptor. it comes in varying degrees. most of the artists that you just listed make way more fringe pop than the bubblegum radio bullshit that is art angels

File: 1499130452340.gif (1MB, 205x211px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 205x211px

Some of her music is ok, but in terms of attractiveness in a classical sense of the word she is one of the least appealing humans I've ever seen, and after all that's the only reason any of these fat fucks talk about her.

>>73916062
>being this retard
Did you seriously imply that:
1. her only selling point is her looks, but she's not attractive
2. her only asset is the way "she dresses like a hipster adolescent and she has a recognizable visual aesthetic that appeals to adolescents"
???

Are you nuts? Such a mental gymnastics in order to dismiss her completely. You basically implied that her music sucks and she's not attractive. Why people would care about such a bad artist? Just because of nice clothes and visual aesthetic? Lmfao!

>>73916158
I love her just the way she is

>>73916158
>waifufag detected
So, she's not attractive (to you). Like that even matters to a musician, not the actual music. Then her music is actually great if people listen to her music and discuss her so much. Checkmate!

>>73916186

>t. fat autistic neckbeard

you love anything that's as less appealing as yourself, she's probably one of the only females out there who's just as greasy and unhygenic as you neckbeards

File: maxresdefault.jpg (181KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1280x720px

>>73916085
>Do you realize that you contradicted yourself
i did no such thing
>If she wouldn't be attractive then her clothes and visual aesthetic would mean shit
this isn't true and you know it. see pic related or any other popular artist who wears gimmicky costumes.
>does dead mouse have a popular, memorable image?
yes
>is it because he's attractive?
obviously not considering you can't even see his face

stop making shit up to defend your fugly waifu

>>73916222
Ok

>>73916169
>You basically implied that her music sucks and she's not attractive
yes. because that's exactly what i meant to imply.
>Why people would care about such a bad artist?
idk anon why don't you explain your shit taste to me?

>>73915973
>Kate Bush
made ambient pop, so she's a bit more patrician then Grimes but still isn't
>Laurie Anderson
Made art pop but also made ambient, spoken word, and minimal synth, so patrician.
>Roxy Music
Glam rock, still not patrician (even though I like them)
>David Bowie
Outside of his art rock albums, not patrician
>Peter Gabriel
See above
>Bjork
Not patrician, as much as I love her
>Elizabeth Fraser
Nope, still pleb. Just because it's dreamy doesn't make it patrician

File: 1493697235903.jpg (195KB, 783x1044px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 783x1044px

I like her music and her style and her look. The longer trolls stick around Grimesthreads, they will, too.

What is your current favorite track by Grimes?
What do you want to see in her next album? Something utterly new? Visions 2.0?
Personally I'd be happy with something Visions-like.

>>73907866
Metis?

It's clear that she always wanted to do more mainstream stuff like Art Angles from the get go.

I mean she did go to art school and probably liked making gedi primes and halfaxa as an art piece but musically is vibes more with poppy stuff

That's at least what I get from her

>>73916345
In this case you really suck. I'm done with you, plebster.

>>73916618
To be fair, Halfaxa and Geidi Primes are still VERY poppy

>>73916356
Wait a minute: what is your objective criteria for judging an artist if they're patricians or not?

File: disgust.jpg (14KB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 240x320px

>>73916662
>you really suck
>being this buttmad over someone disagreeing with you

File: 1498826986851.png (3MB, 1384x1264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1384x1264px

>>73916513
>What is your current favorite track by Grimes?
Heartbeats
>What do you want to see in her next album? Something utterly new? Visions 2.0?
Something new even if I'd love Visions 2.0. I want to be surprised.

File: AomrRgOZ.jpg (43KB, 500x430px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x430px

>>73916690
>implying retarded opinions = arguments

>>73916683
Can you not read or are you just putting on an act? I like most of those artists, I even emphasized that for Roxy Music and Bjork. Grimes is simply not patrician.

>>73916737
I never even mentioned the words "opinion" or "argument" in my post, but I'll bite your bait. What's retarded about his opinion? You really do seem angry that he disagrees with you, and calling him a pleb for not liking pop music is just sad.

>>73916769
I'm not even mad. I just s m h at this pleb that believes that her music sucks and she's not attractive and yet she's really beloved by many people. His opinions are absurd.

>>73917051
>I'm not even mad
I would have to get pretty mad to needlessly call someone's opinions "retarded" for no reason, by OK
>at this pleb
see the last 13 words of >>73916769
>that believes that her music sucks
That's his opinion m8, I happen to agree but I'm not calling you retarded for it
>And she's not attractive
she really isn'y
>yet she's really beloved by so many people
Irrelevant
>His opinions are absurd
What's absurd about them?